In institutional social work, decision-making is a core task that increasingly involves more than one professional as well as, frequently, the clients. Group decision-making is fundamentally different from individual decision-making in that it is an inherently social activity calling for the communicative competencies of those involved. In this article, we describe group decision-making procedures for a specific setting of German child welfare. Condensing our findings into an idealised model of decision-making, we attempt to show how communicative and interactive exigencies conflict with decision-making rationalities. We go on to discuss the consequences this conflict has on the participation of clients in the decision-making process, arguing that social workers are likely to address both rationales separately. We show that accordingly, participation in the interaction does not necessarily safeguard a partaking in the decision.
Banks, Sarah ( 1995) Ethics and Values in Social Work. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
2.
Boden, Deirdre ( 1994) The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
3.
Brown, Rupert ( 1988) Dynamics Within and Between Groups. Oxford: Blackwell.
4.
Cuzzi, Lawrence F., Holden, Gary, Grob, Gail Green and Bazer, Carolyn ( 1993) ‘Decision Making in Social Work: A Review’ , Social Work in Healthcare18(2): 1-22.
5.
Drew, Paul and Heritage, John ( 1992) ‘Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction’ , in Paul Drew and John Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp. 3-65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Garfinkel, Harold ( 1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7.
Göbbel, Inge, Kühn, Martin and Thiel, Eckhard ( 2000) ‘Hilfeplanung auf dem Prüfstand. Erfahrungen aus dem Hilfeverbund SOS-Kinderdorf Worpswede’, SOS-Dialog6: 18-25.
8.
Hall, Christopher and Slembrouck, Stefaan ( 2001) ‘Parent Participation in Social Work Meetings: The Case of Child Protection Conferences’, European Journal of Social Work4: 143-60.
9.
Hall, Christopher, Sarangi, Srikant and Slembrouck, Stefaan ( 1999) ‘The Legitimation of the Client and the Profession: Identities and Roles in Social Work Discourse’, in Srikant Sarangi and Celia Roberts (eds) Talk, Work and Institutional Order, pp. 293-322. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter .
10.
Hall, Christopher, Sarangi, Srikant and Slembrouck, Stefaan ( 2006) Language Practices in Social Work: Categorisation and Accountability in Child Welfare. London: Routledge.
11.
Heritage, John ( 1997) ‘Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk: Analyzing Data’, in David Silverman (ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice pp. 161-81. London : SAGE.
12.
Hofstede, Gerard, Nijnatten, Carolus van and Suurmond, Jeanine ( 2001) ‘Communication Strategies of Family Supervisors and Clients in Organizing Participation’, European Journal of Social Work4: 131-42.
13.
Housley, William ( 2003) Interaction in Multidisciplinary Teams. Aldershot: Ashgate.
14.
Huisman, Marjan ( 2001) ‘Decision-Making in Meetings as Talk-in-Interaction’ , International Studies of Management and Organisation31(3): 69-90.
15.
Jones, Loring ( 1993) ‘Decision Making in Child Welfare: a Critical Review of the Literature’, Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal10(3): 241-62.
16.
Linell, Per and Luckmann, Thomas ( 1991) ‘Asymmetries in Dialogue: Some Conceptual Preliminaries’ , in Ivana Markova and Klaus Foppa (eds) Asymmetries in Dialogue , pp. 1-20. Hempel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
17.
March, James G. and Simon, Herbert A. ( 1958) Organizations. New York: Wiley.
18.
Mehan, Hugh ( 1979) Learning Lessons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
19.
Nikander, Pirjo ( 2003) ‘The Absent Client: Case Description and Decision Making in Interprofessional Meetings’, in Christopher Hall, Kirsi Juhila, Nigel Parton and Tarja Pösö (eds) Constructing Clienthood in Social Work and Human Services: Interaction, Identities and Practices, pp. 123-40. London /New York: Jessica Kingsley .
20.
O’Sullivan, Terence ( 1999) Decision Making in Social Work. Basingstoke : Macmillan.
21.
Pomerantz, Anita ( 1984) ‘Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes’, in J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 57-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Poole, Marshall Scott and Hirokawa, Randy Y. ( 1996) ‘Introduction: Communication and Group Decision Making’, in Randy Y. Hirokawa and Marshall Scott Poole (eds) Communication and Group Decision Making, pp. 3-18. London: SAGE.
23.
Ross, Judith W. ( 1993) ‘Decision Making and Social Work: Another Look’ , Health and Social Work18(1): 3-6.
24.
Sacks, Harvey ( 1992) Lectures on Conversation, ed. Gail Jefferson and Emanuel Schegloff. Oxford: Blackwell.
25.
Schrapper, Christian and Pies, Silke ( 2003) ‘Hilfeplanung als Kontraktmanagement: Erster Zwischenbericht des Forschungs- und Entwicklungsprojekts "Hilfeplanung als Kontraktmanagement"’ , MS Koblenz.
van de Luitgaarden, Guido ( 2009) ‘Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work: Lessons from Judgment and Decision-making Theory’, British Journal of Social Work39: 243-260.
28.
Vierzigmann, Gabriele ( 2002) ‘Mein Kind ist im Heim: Petra Loderer Berichtet über ihre Arbeit mit Eltern, deren Kinder Fremduntergebracht sind’ , SOS-Dialog8: 64-70.
29.
Webb, Stephen A. ( 2008) ‘Modelling Service User Participation in Social Care’, Journal of Social Work8(3): 269-90.
