Bracketing is a method used in qualitative research to mitigate the potentially deleterious effects of preconceptions that may taint the research process. However, the processes through which bracketing takes place are poorly understood, in part as a result of a shift away from its phenomenological origins. The current article examines the historical and philosophical roots of bracketing, and analyzes the tensions that have arisen since the inception of bracketing in terms of its definition, who brackets, methods of bracketing, and its timing in the research process. We propose a conceptual framework to advance dialogue around bracketing and to enhance its implementation.
AhernK J. (1999) Pearls, Pith, and Provocation: Ten Tips for Reflexive Bracketing, Qualitative Health Research9(3): 407–11.
2.
AshworthP (1999) “Bracketing” in Phenomenology: Renouncing Assumptions in Hearing About Student Cheating, Qualitative Studies in Education12(6): 707–21.
3.
BeechI (1999) Bracketing in Phenomenological Research, Nursing Researcher6(3): 35–51.
4.
CaelliK (2000) The Changing Face of Phenomenological Research: Traditional and American Phenomenology in Nursing, Qualitative Health Research10: 366–77.
5.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative AnalysisLos Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
6.
CohenMZOmeryA (1994) Schools of Phenomenology: Implications for Research, in MorseJanice M. (ed) Critical Issues in Qualitative Research MethodsThousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 136–56.
7.
CreswellJMillerD (2000) Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry, Theory into Practice39(3): 124–30.
8.
CrottyM (1996) Phenomenology and Nursing ResearchMelbourne: Churchill Livingston.
9.
CrottyM (1998) The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research ProcessThousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
CutcliffeJ (2003) Reconsidering Reflexivity: Introducing the Case for Intellectual Entrepreneurship, Qualitative Health Research13(1): 136–48.
11.
DenzinN (2002) Social Work in the Seventh Moment, Qualitative Social Work1(1): 25–38.
12.
DrewN (2004) Creating a Synthesis of Intentionality: The Role of the Bracketing Facilitator, Advances in Nursing Science27(3): 215–23.
13.
FinlayL (2008) A Dance Between the Reduction and Reflexivity: Explicating the Phenomenological Psychological Attitude, Journal of Phenomenological Psychology39(1): 1–32.
14.
GearingR (2004) Bracketing in Research: A Typology, Qualitative Health Research14(10): 1429–52.
15.
GiorgiA (1998) Phenomenological Nursing Researchpaper presented at the University of Minnesota Conference.
16.
GlaserBG (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded TheoryMill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
17.
GlaserBG (1992) Emergence Vs Forcing: Basics of Grounded TheoryMill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
18.
GlaserBG (1998) Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and DiscussionsMill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
19.
HansonEJ (1994) Issues Concerning the Familiarity of Researchers with the Research Setting, Journal of Advanced Nursing20: 940–2.
20.
HeideggerM. MacquarrieJRobinsonE (1962) Being and TimeNew York: Harper & Row.
21.
HusserlE. GilsonWRB (1931) Ideas: General Introduction to Pure PhenomenologyNew York: Humanities Press, Original work published 1913.
22.
HutP (2001) The Role of Husserl’s Epoche for Science: A View From a Physicist. Invited paper presented at the 31st Husserl Circle Conference, Bloomington, IN.
23.
KockelmansJJ (1987) Phenomenological Psychology: The Dutch SchoolBoston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
24.
LadkinD (2005) The Enigma of Subjectivity: How Might Phenomenology Help Action Researchers Negotiate the Relationship Between “Self”, “other” and “truth”, Action Research3(1): 108–26.
25.
LeVasseurJ (2003) The Problem of Bracketing in Phenomenology, Qualitative Health Research13(3): 408–20.
26.
MorseJ (1995) The Significance of Saturation, Qualitative Health Research5(2): 147–9.
27.
PatersonBGroeningM (1996) Teacher-induced Countertransference in Clinical Teaching, Journal of Advanced Nursing23: 1121–6.
28.
PoindexterC (2003) The Ubiquity of Ambiguity in Research Interviewing, Qualitative Social Work2(4): 383–409.
29.
PorterS (1993) Nursing Research Conventions: Objectivity or Obfuscation, Journal of Advanced Nursing18: 137–43.
30.
ReamerFG (1998) Ethical Standards in Social Work: A Critical Review of the NASW Code of EthicsWashington, DC: NASW Press.
31.
RollsLRelfM (2006) Bracketing Interviews: Addressing Methodological Challenges in Qualitative Interviewing in Bereavement and Palliative Care, Mortality11(3): 286–305.
32.
SchuttRK (2006) Investigating the Social World: The Process and Practice of ResearchThousand Oaks, CA: Pine Oaks Press.
33.
SmallR (2001) A Hundred Years of Phenomenology: Perspectives on a Philosophical TraditionBurlington, VT: Ashgate.
34.
SmithBSmithDW (1995) The Cambridge Companion to HusserlCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
SpiegelbergH (1965) The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical IntroductionThe Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
36.
StarksHTrinidadSB (2007) Choose Your Method: A Comparison of Phenomenology, Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory, Qualitative Health Research17(10): 1372–80.
van HazewijkRStamHJPanhuysenG (2001) Existential Questions: No, One or Two Utrecht Schools?,paper presented at the 20th Conference of the European Society for the History of the Human Sciences, Amsterdam.
