In this article the question about what counts (as results and evidence) in public services for the welfare of vulnerable children is discussed with reference to interviews with three former child protection clients. The purpose of the interviews was to learn how former clients experienced `being under care', and what short- and long-term consequences or results they found it had in their case. The question that is being raised here is whether basic care, being cared for and loved without too much concern about obtaining specific goals, is in danger of being given less priority in result-oriented and evidence-based child welfare services. The context of the interviews which are referred to here is Norwegian child protection services, but the question that is raised on the basis of this study relates to a more wide-spread and general debate about what should count as evidence in child protection and welfare.
Angel, Bjørn ystein (2003) Evidensbaserte Programmer: Kunnskapsformer og Menneskesyn i Sosialt Arbeid' [Evidence-based Programs: Types of Knowledge and View of Man in Social Work], Nordisk Sosialt Arbeid23(2): 66-72.
2.
Broadbent, Jane and Laughlin, Richard (1997) `"Accounting Logic" and Controlling Professionals', in Jane Broadbent , Michael Dietrich and Jennifer Roberts (eds) The End of the Professions?: The Restructuring of Professional Work, pp. 34-49. London: Routledge.
3.
Cleaver, Hedy (1997) `New Research on Teenagers: Key Findings and the Implications for Policy and Practice', Adoption and Fostering21(1): 37-43.
4.
Egelund Nielsen, Henrik (ed.) (2005) TABUKA: Tidligere Anbragtes bud på Kvalitet i Anbringelsen af Børn og Unge [TABUKA: Former Clients' Viewpoints on Quality in Residential Care for Children and Youth]. København: Børn og Unge .
5.
Ekeland, Tor-Johan (1999) `Evidensbasert Behandling: Kvalitetssikring eller Instrumentalistisk Mistak' [Evidence-based Treatment: Quality Assurance or Instrumentalistic Fallacy?], Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening36(11): 1036-47.
6.
Fossestøl, Bjørg (2002) `Hva er Det du Kan da, Sånn Egentlig?: Et Vitenskapelig Essay om Kunnskapsregimer i Sosialt Arbeid'[What are you Actually Doing in your Professional Work? A Scientific Essay on Knowledge Regimes in Social Work], in John Lundstøl (ed.) I Dannelsens Tegn: Profesjonell Selvforståelse i Arbeid Med Mennesker [On the Understanding of Self in Work with People], pp. 93-109. Oslo : Gyldendal Akademiske.
7.
Glaser, Barney G. and Strauss, Anselm L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL : Aldine.
8.
Halvorsen, Anne (2005) `Mot en Bredere Forståelse av Resultater og Evidens i Barnevernet?' [Toward a Broader Understanding of Results and Evidence in Child Protection], Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning8(1): 47-57.
9.
Hansson,Jan-Håkan (2003) `Om en Kunskapsbaserad Socialtjänst' [On Knowledge-based Social Work], Nordisk Sosialt Arbeid23(4): 194-200.
10.
Helgeland, Ingeborg M. (2003) `Ungdom med Atferdsvansker: Hvordan går det med dem som 30-åringer?' [Youth with Behavioral Problems: How are they Coping when they have reached 30], in Elisabeth Backe-Hansen (ed.) Barn utenfor Hjemmet: Flytting i Barnevernets Regi [Children who have to move and live away from their Families], pp. 147-65. Oslo : Gyldendal Akademiske.
11.
Howe, David (1993) On Being a Client: Understanding the Process of Counselling and Psychotherapy. London: SAGE.
12.
Humphries, Beth (2003) `What Else Counts as Evidence in Evidence-based Social Work?', Social Work Education22(1): 81-91.
13.
Krogstrup, Hanne K. (2002) `Når Socialt Arbejde Bliver "Standardvare"' [When Social Work become `Standard Merchandize'], Nordisk Sosialt Arbeid22(3): 122-30.
14.
Lipsey, Mark W. (2002) `Metanalysis and Program Outcome Evaluation', Socialvetenskaplig Tidsskrift9(2-3): 194-208.
15.
Macdonald, Geraldine (1998) `Promoting Evidence-based Practice in Child Protection' , Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry3(1): 71-85.
16.
Marthinsen, Edgar (2004) `Evidensbasert: Praksis og Ideology' [Evidence-based: Practice and Ideology], Nordisk Sosialt Arbeid24(4): 290-302.
17.
Miles, Matthew B. and Huberman, A. Michael (1984) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Source-book of New Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
18.
Nyhus, Marit (2002) `Å Lære i Dialogisk Praksis' [Learning in Dialogical Practice], in John Lundstøl (ed.) I Dannelsens Tegn: Profesjonell Selvforståelse i Arbeid Med Mennesker [On the Understanding of Self in Work with People], pp. 110-29. Oslo : Gyldendal Akademiske.
19.
Nylehn, Børre (2002) `Kan Profesjonelle Samarbeide?' [Can Professions Collaborate?], in Anne Marie Støkken and Børre Nylehn (ed.) De Profesjonelle: Relasjoner, Identitet og Utdanning [Professions: Relations, Identities and Education], pp. 52-68. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget .
20.
Pollitt, Christopher (1993) Managerialism and the Public Services: Cuts or Cultural Change in the 1990s?, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
21.
Pollitt, Christopher and Bouckaert, Geert (2000) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Riessman, Cathrine K. (1993) Narrative Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
23.
Roberts, Albert R. and Yeager, Kenneth R. (ed.) (2004) Evidence-based Practice Manual: Research and Outcome Measures in Health and Human Services. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Ryen, Anne (2002) Det Kvalitative Intervjuet: Fra Vitenskapsteori til Feltarbeid [The Qualitative Interview: From Epistemology to Field Work] . Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
25.
Rønning, Rolf (2004) Omsorg som Vare:? Kampen om Omsorgens Sjel i Norske Kommuner [Care as Merchandize?: The Struggle about the Soul of Care in Norwegian Municipalities]. Oslo: Gyldendal akademiske.
26.
Sehested, Karina and Ejersbo, Niels (1998) `Fra Sammenkobling til Dekobling av Ledelse og Profession i den Kommunla Forvaltning' [From Coupling to De-coupling of Management and Professions in Local Government], Nordisk Administrativt Tidsskrift79(4): 414-29.
27.
Schön, Donald A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
28.
Shaw, Ian (1996) Evaluating in Practice. Aldershot : Ashgate.
29.
Shaw, Ian (1999) `Evidence for Practice', in Ian Shaw and Joyce Lishman (ed.) Evaluation and Social Work Practice, pp. 14-40. London: SAGE
30.
Shaw, Ian (2003) `Qualitative Research and Outcomes in Health, Social Work and Education', Qualitative Research3(1): 57-77.
31.
Shaw, Ian (2005) `Evidencing Social Work', in Peter Sommerfeld (ed.) Evidence-Based Social Work: Towards a New Professionalism?, pp. 73-107. Berlin : Peter Lang Ag, European Academic Publishers.
32.
Sinclair, I., Wilson, K. and Gibbs, I. (2000) `A Life More Ordinary: What Children want from Foster Placements', Adoption and Fostering25(4): 17-26.
33.
Stein, M., Pinkerton, J. and Kelleher, P. (2000) `Young People Leaving Care in England, Ireland and Northern Ireland: A Comparative Research Perspective', European Journal of Social Work3(3): 235-46.
34.
Vetlesen, Arne Johan (2001) `Omsorg: Mellom Avhengighet og Autonomi' [Care: Between Dependency and Autonomy], in Knut W. Ruyter and Arne Johan Vetlesen (ed.) Omsorgens Tvetydighet [The Ambiguity of Care], pp. 27-40. Oslo : Gyldendal Akademisk.
35.
Walløe, Inger (1998) `Barnevernsbarns Erfaringer: Fra Byråkrati til Hverdagsliv' [The Experiences of Child Protection Clients: From Bureaucracy to Everyday Life], Norges Barnevern75(3): 4-11.
36.
Webb, Stephen A. (2001) `Some Considerations on the Validity of Evidence-based Practice in Social Work', British Journal of Social Work31(1): 57-79.
