Atkinson, P. and Delamont, S. (1993) ‘Bread and Dreams or Bread and Circuses? A Critique of Case Study Research in Evaluation’, in M. Hammersley (ed.) Controversies in the Classroom. Buckingham: Open University Press.
2.
Atkinson, P., Delamont, S. and Hammersley, M. (1988) ‘Qualitative Research Traditions: A British Response to Jacob’, Review of Educational Research58(2): 231-250.
3.
Becker, H. (1993) ‘Theory: The Necessary Evil’, in D. Flinders and G. Mills (eds) Theory and Concepts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives from the Field. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University Press.
4.
Bloor, M. (1997) ‘Addressing Social Problems through Qualitative Research’, in D. Silverman (ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage.
5.
Bloor, M. and McKeganey, N. (1989) ‘Ethnography Addressing the Practitioner’, in J. Gubrium and D. Silverman (eds) The Politics of Field Research: Sociology Beyond Enlightenment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (1994) ‘Introduction: Entering the Field of Qualitative Research’, in N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
7.
Dingwall, R. (1997) ‘Conclusion: The Moral Discourse of Interactionism’, in G. Miller and R. Dingwall (eds) Context and Method in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
8.
Gilgun, J. (1994) ‘Hand in Glove: The Grounded Theory Approach and Social Work Practice Research’, in E. Sherman and W. J. Reid (eds) Qualitative Research in Social Work. New York: Columbia University Press.
9.
Goldstein, H. (1991) ‘Qualitative Research and Social Work Practice: Partners in Discovery’, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare18(4): 101-119.
10.
Greene, J. (1996) ‘Qualitative Evaluation and Scientific Citizenship’, Evaluation2(3): 277-289.
11.
Greene, J. and Caracelli, V. (1997) Advances in Mixed Method Evaluation: The Challenge and Benefits of Integrating Diverse Paradigms, New Directions For Evaluation, 74. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Hammersley, M. (1992) What’s Wrong with Ethnography?London: Routledge.
13.
House, E. (1980) Evaluating with Validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
House, E. (1991) ‘Realism in Research’, Educational Researcher20(6): 2-9.
15.
Jacob, E. (1987) ‘Qualitative Research Traditions: A Review’, Review of Educational Research57(1): 1-50.
16.
Jarvis, P. (1999) The Practitioner-Researcher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Lorenz, W. (2000) ‘Contentious Identities: Social Work Research and the Search for Professional and Personal Identities’, paper from ESRC seminar series,‘Theorizing Social Work Research’, National Institute for Social Work, URL: http://www.nisw.org.uk/tswr/lorenz.html
18.
McLeod, J. (1999) Practitioner Research in Counseling. London: Sage.
19.
McLeod, J. (2001) Qualitative Research in Counseling and Psychotherapy. London: Sage.
20.
Merton, R. K. (1972) ‘Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge’, American Journal of Sociology78(1): 9-47.
21.
Miller, G. (1997) ‘Contextualizing Texts: Studying Organizational Texts’, in G. Miller and R. Dingwall (eds) Context and Method in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
22.
Mohr, W. K. (1997) ‘Interpretive Interactionism: Denzin’s Potential Contribution to Intervention and Outcomes Research’, Qualitative Health Research7(2): 270-286.
23.
Murphy, E. and Dingwall, R. (2001) ‘The Ethics of Ethnography’, in P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland and L. Lofland (eds) Handbook of Ethnography. London: Sage.
24.
Padgett, D. (1998) ‘Does the Glove Really Fit? Qualitative Research and Clinical Social Work Practice’, Social Work43(4): 373-381.
25.
Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997) Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
26.
Reid, W. (1990) ‘Change-Process Research: A New Paradigm?’, in L. Videka-Sherman and W. Reid (eds) Advances in Clinical Social Work Research. Silver Spring, MD: NASW Press.
27.
Riessman, C. K. (1994) ‘Preface: Making Room for Diversity in Social Work Research’, in C. K. Riessman (ed.) Qualitative Studies in Social Work Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Ruckdeschel, R. and Farris, B. (1982) ‘Assessing Practice, A Critical Look at the Single Case Design’, Social Casework63(5): 272-275.
29.
Shaw, I. and Gould, N. (2001) Qualitative Research in Social Work. London: Sage.
30.
Sherman, E. and Reid, W. (eds) (1994) Qualitative Research in Social Work. New York: Columbia University Press.
31.
Silverman, D. (1997) Discourses of Counseling: HIV Counseling as Social Interaction. London: Sage.
32.
Sinclair, I. (2000) ‘Methods and Measurement in Evaluative Social Work’, paper from ESRC seminar series, ‘Theorizing Social Work Research’, National Institute for Social Work, URL: http://www.nisw.org.uk/tswr/sinclair.html
33.
Stake, R. (1997) ‘Advocacy in Evaluation: A Necessary Evil?’, in E. Chelimsky and W. Shadish (eds) Evaluation for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Stanfield, J. (1994) ‘Empowering the Culturally Diversified Sociological Voice’, in A. Gitlin (ed.) Power and Method: Political Activism and Educational Research. New York: Routledge.
35.
Thyer, B. (2000) ‘Review of I. Shaw and J. Lishman (1999) (eds) Evaluation and Social Work Practice, British Journal of Social Work30(3): 401-402.
36.
Trend, M. G. (1979) ‘On the Reconciliation of Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses’, in T. Cook and C. Reichardt (eds) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
Trinder, L. (2000) ‘Reading the Texts: Postmodern Feminism and the “Doing” of Research’, in B. Fawcett, B. Featherstone, J. Fook and A. Rossiter (eds) Practice and Research in Social Work: Postmodern Feminist Perspectives. London: Routledge.
38.
Vanderplaat, M. (1995) ‘Beyond Technique: Issues in Evaluating for Empowerment’, Evaluation1(1): 81-96.
39.
Witkin, S. (1999) ‘Constructing our Future’, Social Work44(1): 5-8.
40.
Yin, R. K. (1994) Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
