FarrellC. Patient and Public Involvement in Health: The Evidence for Policy Implementation. A Summary of the Results of the Health in Partnership Research Programme. London: Department of Health, 2004, www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/08/23/34/04082334.pdf.
2.
CoadJ. Conducting focus groups with children. Paediatr Nurs2002;14:12.
3.
TetleyJHaynesLHawthorneM. Older people and research partnerships. Qual Ageing2003;4:18–23.
4.
TeareJSmithJ. Using focus groups to explore the views of parents whose children are in hospital. Paediatr Nurs2004;16:30–5.
5.
VivianM. Getting Over the Wall: How the NHS is Improving the Patient's Experience. London: Department of Health, 2004.
6.
GillespieRFlorinDGillamS. How is patient-centred care understood by the clinical, managerial and lay stakeholders responsible for promoting this agenda?Health Expect2004;7:142–8.
7.
GrayJ. Integrated Care Pathway Facilitator Training Course Manual. Donnington: Venture Training and Consulting Ltd, 2005.
8.
GlasziouPChalmersI. Ethics review roulette: what can we learn?Br Med J2004;328:121–2.
9.
AlbertiKGMM. Local research ethics committees. Br Med J1995;311:639–40.
10.
AbbasiKHeathI. Ethics review of research and audit. Br Med J2005;330:431–2.
11.
WarlowC. Clinical research under the cosh again. This time it is ethics committees. Br Med J2004;329:241–2.
12.
World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Ferney-Voltaire: WMA, 2002, http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm. (accessed 9 May 2005).
13.
SmithR. Audit and research. Br Med J1992;305:905–6.
14.
WoodcockTNormanJ. Informed consent. Explicit guidance is required on valid exemptions for need for ethical review, 1997;315:250.
15.
CaytonH. Patient and public involvement. J Health Serv Res Policy2004;9:193–5.
16.
CheekJ. Postmodern and Poststructural Approaches to Nursing Research. California: Sage Publications Inc., 2000.
17.
Royal College of Physicians. Supervision of the Ethics of Clinical Research Investigations in Institutions. London: HMSO, 1967.
18.
Royal College of Physicians of London. Guidelines on the Practice of Ethics Committees in Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. 2nd edn. London: RCP, 1990.
19.
HernshawH. Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study. Br Med J2004;328:140–1.
20.
SavulescuJChalmersIBluntJ. Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability. Br Med J1996;313:1390–3.
21.
AbelsonJForestPGEylesJ. Will it make a difference if I show up and share?: A citizens' perspective on improving public involvement processes for health system decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy2004;9:205–12.
22.
WaldDS. Bureaucracy of ethics applications. Br Med J2004;329:282–4.