BussE (2015) The developmental stakes of youth participation in American Juvenile Court. In: GalTDuramyBF (eds) International Perspectives and Empirical Findings on Child Participation, From Social Exclusion to Child-Inclusive Policies. New York: Oxford University Press, 303–331.
2.
BussE (2021) The Milwaukee youth engagement pilot: Evidence of reciprocal legal socialization in Juvenile Court. Journal of Social Issues77: 528–546.
3.
BussE (2022) Kids are not so different: The path from juvenile exceptionalism to prison abolition. The University of Chicago Law Review84(4): 843–900.
4.
KilkellyU (2008) Youth courts and children’s rights: The Irish experience. Youth Justice8(1): 39–56.
5.
LiefaardT (2016) Child-friendly justice: Protection and participation of children in the justice system. Temple Law Review88: 905–927.
6.
RapS (2013) The Participation of Juvenile Defendants in the Youth Court. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
7.
Roper v. Simmons (2005) 543 U.S. 551.
8.
ShermanLW (1993) Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: A theory of the criminal sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30(4): 445–473.
9.
SteinbergLScottES (2003) Less guilty by reason of adolescence: Developmental immaturity, diminished responsibility, and the Juvenile death penalty. American Psychologist58(12): 1009–1018.
10.
TylerTR (2006) Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
TylerTRTrinknerR (2017) Why Children Follow Rules: Legal Socialization and the Development of Legitimacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
WeijersI (2004) Requirements for communication in the courtroom: A comparative perspective on the youth court in England/Wales and The Netherlands. Youth Justice4(1): 22–31.
