Adolescents’ and Parents’ Knowledge of Laws Pertaining to Adolescent Sexual Behavior: The Role of Perceived Policy Fairness on Adolescents’ Willingness to Violate the Law
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2023
Adolescents’ and Parents’ Knowledge of Laws Pertaining to Adolescent Sexual Behavior: The Role of Perceived Policy Fairness on Adolescents’ Willingness to Violate the Law
This study evaluated 190 adolescent–parent dyads from two US sites (CA and TX) about their awareness of and attitudes toward adolescent sexting and age of sexual consent policies. Findings indicate (a) poor policy awareness among adolescents and parents, particularly for the Texas sample, (b) positive associations between parent and adolescent awareness, (c) site differences in fairness ratings, and (d) a negative association between adolescents’ fairness ratings and their willingness to violate the policies. We recommend greater efforts toward policy education, given the lack of awareness in the present sample, and consideration for the developmental appropriateness of policies.
BierieDMBuddKM (2018) Romeo, Juliet, and statutory rape. Sexual Abuse30(3): 296–321.
2.
BottomsATankebeJ (2012) Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology102(1): 119–170.
3.
CavanaghCCauffmanE (2015) Viewing law and order: Mothers’ and sons’ justice system legitimacy attitudes and juvenile recidivism. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law21(4): 432–441.
4.
CavanaghCCauffmanE (2017) What they don’t know can hurt them: Mothers’ legal knowledge and youth re-offending. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law23(2): 141–153.
5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2017) Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance, 2015. Washington, DC: CDC.
6.
Centers for Disease Control. and Prevention (CDC) (2019) Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance, 2019. Washington, DC: CDC.
7.
ClearyHMDNajdowskiCJ (2019) Awareness of sex offender registration policies and self-reported sexual offending in a community sample of adolescents. Sexuality Research and Social Policy17(3): 486–499.
8.
CohenM (2008) No child left behind bars: The need to combat cruel and unusual punishment of state statutory rape laws. Journal of Law and Policy16(2): 717–756.
9.
CooperAWallinARQuasJALyonTD (2010) Maltreated and nonmaltreated children’s knowledge of the juvenile dependency court system. Child Maltreatment15(3): 255–260.
10.
CooperDK (1997) Juveniles’ understanding of trial-related information: Are they competent defendants?Behavioral Sciences and the Law15(2): 167–180.
11.
DegnerJDalegeJ (2013) The apple does not fall far from the tree, or does it? A meta-analysis of parent-child similarity in intergroup attitudes. Psychological Bulletin139(6): 1270–1304.
12.
DeLamaterJFriedrichWN (2002) Human sexual development. Journal of Sex Research39(1): 10–14.
13.
DiamondLSavin-WilliamsR (2011) Sexuality. In: BrownBPrinsteinM (eds) Encyclopedia of Adolescence, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 314–321.
14.
DiCataldoFC (2009) The Perversion of Youth: Controversies in the Assessment and Treatment of Juvenile Sex Offenders. New York: New York University Press.
15.
EasseyJMBomanJH (2016) Deterrence theory. In: JenningsWGHigginsGEMaldonado-MolinaMM, et al. (eds) The Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment, 1st Edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 1–6.
16.
FaganJTylerTR (2005) Legal socialization of children and adolescents. Social Justice Research18(3): 217–241.
17.
FineADTrinknerR (n.d.) Legal socialization. In GurungR. (Ed.), Routledge Research Encyclopedia of Psychology in the Real World. Routledge.
18.
FineADPadillaKETomKE (2020a) Police legitimacy: Identifying developmental trends and whether youths’ perceptions can be changed. Journal of Experimental Criminology. Epub ahead of print 10August. DOI: 10.1007/s11292-020-09438-7.
19.
FineADThomasAvan RooijBCauffmanE (2020b) Age-graded differences and parental influences on adolescents’ obligation to obey the law. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology6(1): 25–42.
20.
FranklinJ (2012) Where art thou, privacy: Expanding privacy rights of minors in regard to consensual sex: Statutory rape laws and the need for a Romeo and Juliet exception in Illinois. The John Marshall Law Review46(1): 309–332.
21.
GauJM (2010) A longitudinal analysis of citizens’ attitudes about police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management33(2): 236–252.
HalpernCTHaydonAA (2012) Sexual timetables for oral-genital, vaginal, and anal intercourse: Sociodemographic comparisons in a nationally representative sample of adolescents. American Journal of Public Health103(6): 1221–1228.
24.
HindsL (2009) Youth, police legitimacy and informal contact. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology24(1): 10–21.
HudsonHKFetroJV (2015) Sexual activity: Predictors of sexting behaviors and intentions to sext among selected undergraduate students. Computers in Human Behavior49: 615–622.
27.
KaufmanE (2020) Punishing victim as perpetrator: In re: S.K. and the chilling effect of labeling teen sexting as child pornography. University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class20(1): 112–135.
28.
KimP (1999) Norms, learning and law: Exploring the influences of workers’ legal knowledge. University of Illinois Legal Review2: 447–516.
29.
KlettkeBHallfordDJMellorDJ (2014) Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review34(1): 44–53.
30.
KlimstraT (2013) Adolescent personality development and identity formation. Child Development Perspectives7(2): 80–84.
31.
LevickMMoonK (2010) Prosecuting sexting as child pornography: A critique. Valparaiso University Law Review44(4): 1035–1054.
32.
LewisRTantonCMercerCHMitchellKRPalmerMMacdowallWWellingsK (2017) Heterosexual practices among young people in Britain: Evidence from three national surveys of sexual attitudes and lifestyles. Journal of Adolescent Health61(6): 694–702.
McElhaneyKBAllenJPStephensonJCHareAL (2009) Attachment and autonomy during adolescence. In: LernerRMSteinbergL (eds) Handbook of Adolescent Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 358–403.
35.
McLeanKWolfeSEPrattTC (2019) Legitimacy and the life course: An age-graded examination of changes in legitimacy attitudes over time. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency56(1): 42–83.
36.
MadiganSLyARashCLVan OuytselJTempleJR (2018) Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics172(4): 327–335.
37.
MaguireER (2018) New frontiers in research on procedural justice and legitimacy in policing. Police Practice and Research19(2): 107–110.
38.
MaheuxAEvansRWidmanLNesiJPrinsteinMJChoukas-BradleyS (2020) Popular peer norms and adolescent sexting behavior. Journal of Adolescence78: 62–66.
39.
MouleRKJrParryMMFoxB (2019) Legal socialization and selective exposure to ‘cop-watching’ websites. Policing: An International Journal42(6): 1063–1080.
40.
PetroniSDasMSawyerSM (2019) Protection versus rights: Age of marriage versus age of sexual consent. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health3(4): 274–280.
41.
PiqueroARFaganJMulveyEPSteinbergLOdgersC (2005) Developmental trajectories of legal socialization among serious adolescent offenders. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology96(1): 267–298.
42.
RedlichADShteynbergRV (2016) To plead or not to plead: A comparison of juvenile and adult true and false plea decisions. Law and Human Behavior40(6): 611–625.
43.
SaundersLE (1975) Collective ignorance: Public knowledge of family law. Family Coordinator24: 69–74.
44.
ShubikCKendallJ (2007) Rethinking juvenile status offense laws: Considerations for congressional review of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act. Family Court Review45(3): 384–398.
45.
SmetanaJGCampione-BarrNDaddisC (2004) Longitudinal development of family decision making: Defining healthy behavioral autonomy for middle-class African American adolescents. Child Development75(5): 1418–1434.
SmithTF (1985) Law talk: Juveniles’ understanding of legal language. Journal of Criminal Justice13(4): 339–353.
48.
SteinerBWrightE (2006) Assessing the relative effects of state direct file waiver laws on violent juvenile crime: Deterrence or irrelevance?The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology96(4): 1451–1477.
49.
StevensonMCNajdowskiCJWileyTRA (2013) Knowledge of juvenile sex offender registration laws predicts adolescent sexual behavior. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse22(1): 103–118.
50.
StrassbergDSMckinnonRKSustaitatMARulloJE (2012) Sexting by high school students: An exploratory and descriptive study. Archives of Sexual Behavior42(1): 15–21.
51.
StrohmaierHMurphyMDeMatteoD (2014) Youth sexting: Prevalence rates, driving motivations, and the deterrent effect of legal consequences. Sexuality Research and Social Policy11(3): 245–255.
52.
SymonsKPonnetKWalraveMHeirmanW (2018) Sexting scripts in adolescent relationships: Is sexting becoming the norm?New Media and Society20(10): 3836–3857.
53.
TankebeJ (2013) Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology51(1): 103–135.
54.
TempleJRPaulJAvan den BergPLeVDMcElhaneyATempleBW (2012) Teen sexting and its association with sexual behaviors. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine166(9): 828–833.
55.
ThomasAGCauffmanE (2014) Youth sexting as child pornography? Developmental science supports less harsh sanctions for juvenile sexters. New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal17(4): 631–651.
56.
TolmanDLMcClellandSI (2011) Normative sexuality development in adolescence: A decade in review, 2000–2009. Journal of Research on Adolescence21: 242–255.
57.
TrinknerECohnE (2014) Putting the ‘social’ back in legal socialization: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and cynicism in legal and nonlegal authorities. Law and Human Behavior38(6): 602–617.
58.
TylerTR (1990) Why people obey the law. Contemporary Sociology20(6): 914–916.
59.
TylerTR (1997) Procedural fairness and compliance with the law. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics133(2): 219–240.
60.
TylerTRTrinknerR (2017) Why Children Follow Rules: Legal Socialization and the Development of Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61.
TylerTRFagaJGellerA (2014) Street stops and police legitimacy: Teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies11(4): 751–785.
62.
VidalSClearyHWoolardJMichelJ (2017) Adolescents’ legal socialization: Effects of interrogation and Miranda knowledge on legitimacy, cynicism, and procedural justice. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice15(4): 419–440.
63.
WalraveMHeirmanWHallamL (2014) Under pressure to sext? Applying the theory of planned behaviour to adolescent sexting. Behaviourand Information Technology33(1): 86–98.
64.
WhiteBWillmottLCartwrightCParkerMWilliamsG (2014) Doctors’ knowledge of the law on withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining medical treatment. Medical Journal of Australia201(4): 229–232.
65.
WolfeSEMcLeanKPrattTC (2017) I learned it by watching you: Legal socialization and the intergenerational transmission of legitimacy attitudes. British Journal of Criminology57(5): 1123–1143.
66.
WoolardJLClearyHMDHarvellSASChenR (2008) Examining adolescents’ and their parents’ conceptual and practical knowledge of police interrogation: A family dyad approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence37(6): 685–698.
67.
ZelleHRomaineCLRGoldsteinNES (2015) Juveniles’ Miranda comprehension: Understanding, appreciation, and totality of circumstances factors. Law and Human Behavior39(3): 281–293.
68.
ZimringFRushinS (2013) Did changes in juvenile sanctions reduce juvenile crime rates? A natural experiment. Illinois Public Law and Legal Theory Research Papers11(1): 57–69.
