The school context has been found to be highly influential in youth justice assessments of young people. Using Belgium as a case study and based on a study of court files and interviews with youth justice professionals, this article traces the significance of school-based information in decisions made on Roma youth. More specifically, it examines what these discourses communicate and how they shape young people’s correctional trajectories. The article argues that negative school experiences and discriminatory practices in education towards Roma are often reflected in youth justice professionals’ construction of the problems presented by Roma youth, albeit within a different discursive framing. The article draws on the notion of ‘entextualisation’ (extracting discourse from its original context and re-inserting it in another setting) and its consequences for young people from Roma backgrounds who come into conflict with the law.
ArabadjievaK (2015) Challenging the school segregation of Roma children in Central and Eastern Europe. The International Journal of Human Rights20(1): 33–54.
5.
BacchiC (2009) Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be?London: Pearson Education Limited.
6.
BacchiCBonhamJ (2014) Reclaiming discursive practices as an analytic focus: Political implications. Foucault Studies17: 173–192.
7.
BaumanRBriggsCL (1990) Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology19: 59–88.
8.
BrahamMBrahamM (2000) Romani migrations and EU enlargement. Cambridge Review of International Affairs13(2): 97–116.
9.
ChinoleC (2007) Denial of the right to education for Roma in the European Union. Revista Românâ de Bioeticâ5(3): 37–50.
10.
ChristiaensJ (2015) It’s for Your Own Good! Research on Youth Justice Practices. Brussels: VUB Press.
11.
ChristianakisM (2010) Lessons for life: Roma children, communal practices, and the global marketplace. Perspectives on Urban Education8: 11–18.
12.
ChristianakisM (2015) Victimization and vilification of Romani children in media and human rights organizations discourses. Social Inclusion3(5): 48–63.
13.
CicourelA (1976) The Social Organization of Juvenile Justice. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
14.
CoyleM (2013) Talking Criminal Justice: Language and the Just Society. New York: Routledge.
15.
De BusSNuytiensA (2016) Onbehandelbare meisjes? De benadering van Roma-meisjes voor een MOF verschenen voor de jeugdrechtbank. Tijdschrift Voor Jeugd- En Kinderrechten1: 35–53.
16.
De BusSPetintsevaONuytiensA (2017) Roma-meisjes op de jeugdrechtbank: professionele actoren aan het woord. Tijdschrift Voor Jeugd-En Kinderrechten2: 84–107.
17.
DeklerckJ (2007) Sluimerende perspectieven in de nieuwe Jeugdwet?Panopticon6: 26–42.
18.
DumortierE (2007) De strijd om de jeugddelinquent. Panopticon6: 1–4.
19.
EadesD (2010) Sociolinguistics and the Legal Process. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
20.
European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC) (2010) Improving the Tools for the Social Inclusion and Non-Discrimination of Roma in the EU. European Commission: Budapest.
21.
European Commission (2004) The Situation of Roma in an Enlarged European Union. Luxemburg: Directorate-General for Employment and Social Affairs.
22.
European Commission (2014) Report on Discrimination of Roma Children in Education. Utrecht, Brussels: Directorate-General for Justice.
23.
European Union Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) (2004) The Comprehensive Monitoring Report of the European Commission on the State of Preparedness for EU Membership of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia. European Commission: Brussels.
24.
FaircloughN (2010) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, 2nd Edition.Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
FranssensMPutJDeklerckJ (2010) Het Beleid Van De Jeugdmagistraat. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.
27.
GayyBlascoP (2008) Picturing ‘Gypsies’. Third Text22: 297–303.
28.
GilbertEMahieuV (2012) Onderzoek naar de beslissingen van jeugdrechters/jeugdrechtbanken in MOF-zaken. Brussels: NICC.
29.
GillR (2000) Discourse analysis. In: BauerMWGaskellG (eds) Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound: A Practical Handbook. London: SAGE, 172–190.
30.
GrillJ (2012) Going up to England’: Exploring mobilities among Roma from Eastern Slovakia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies38: 1269–1287.
31.
HebberechtPBaillergeauE (eds) (2012) Social Crime Prevention in Late Modern Europe: A Comparative Perspective. Brussels: VUBPress.
32.
HemelsoetE (2012) Roma in Het Gentse Onderwijs. Een Verhaal Apart?Ghent: Academia Press.
33.
HepworthK (2011) Romani politics in contemporary Europe: Poverty, ethnic mobilization and the neoliberal order. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies38: 189–190.
34.
IlanJ (2010) If you don’t let us in, we’ll get arrested’: Class-cultural dynamics in the provision of, and resistance to, youth justice work. Youth Justice10: 25–39.
35.
João GuiaMvan der WoudeMvan der LeunJ (eds) (2013) Social Control and Justice. Crimmigration in the Age of Fear. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
36.
KusaZ (2011) Promoting the Social Inclusion of Roma: A Study of National Policies. Brussels: European Commission.
37.
LagetR (2015) Gelijke kansen en onderwijs in Vlaamse scholen: het ‘Roma-attest’. Tijdschrift Voor Mensenrechten5: 8–11.
38.
LareauA (2003) Unequal Childhoods. Class, Race and Family Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
39.
LempertMPerrinoS (2007) Entextualization and the ends of temporality. Language & Communication27: 205–211.
40.
LewisO (1998) The culture of poverty. Society35(2): 7.
41.
LipskyM (1980) Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russel SAGE Foundation.
42.
MarynsK (2014) The Asylum Speaker: Language in the Belgian Asylum Procedure. London: Routledge.
43.
MatthysG (2014) Tsjechische Roma in Lokeren. Lokeren: Odice.
44.
MonteiroAPMartinsJMoreiraP (2015) Factors of school absenteeism among Roma children – an integrative review. European Psychiatry30: 1166.
45.
Montesano MontessoriNSchumanHDe LangeR (2012) Kritische Discoursanalyse. De Macht En Kracht Van Taal En Tekst. Brussels: ASP.
46.
MuncieJ (2006) Governing young people: Coherence and contradiction in contemporary youth justice. Critical Social Policy26: 770–793.
47.
National Action Plan on Inclusive Education (2010) Approved by the Czech Government on March 1, 2010.
48.
NoyC (2015) Thank You for Dying for Our Country: Commemorative Texts and Performances in Jerusalem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
O’HigginsNBrüggemannC (2014) The consequences of cumulative discrimination: How special schooling influences employment and wages of Roma in the Czech Republic. European Educational Research Journal13(3): 282–294.
50.
OrellanaMF (2009) Translating Childhoods: Immigrant Youth, Language, and Culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
ParkJSYBucholtzM (2009) Public transcripts: Entextualization and linguistic representation in institutional contexts. Text and Talk29(5): 485–502.
53.
PetintsevaO (2015) Studying discriminatory practices in youth justice decision-making. In: ChristiaensJ (ed.) It’s for Your Own Good: Researching Youth Justice Practices. Brussels: VUB Press, 175–193.
54.
PetintsevaO (2016) Perspectives on ‘New’ Migrants in Youth Justice: Constitutions, Circularity and Effects of Institutional Discourses on Roma and Caucasian Youth. Ghent: Ghent University.
55.
PhillipsS (1998) Ideology in the Language of Judges: How Judges Practice Law, Politics, and Courtroom Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
PresserL (2009) The narratives of offenders. Theoretical Criminology13: 177–200.
57.
PutJRomM (2007) Het Nieuwe Jeugdrecht. Ghent: Larcier.
58.
ReayD (2001) Finding or losing yourself? Working-class relationships to education. Journal of Education Policy16: 333–346.
59.
RekoshESleeperM (2004) Separate and Unequal: Combatting Discrimination Against Roma in Education. Budapest: The Global Network for Public Interest Law.
60.
SaldañaJ (2015) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: SAGE.
SierraAC (2013) Indirect Discrimination and School Segregation of Roma Children in the Czech Republic: The Parental Consent Defence. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia.
63.
SilversteinMUrbanG (eds) (1996) Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
64.
StumpfJ (2006) The crimmigration crisis: Immigrants, crime, and sovereign power. American University Law Review56: 367–419.
65.
TerlouwA (2014) De Weg Naar (Het Recht Op) School Voor Romakinderen. Nijmegen Migration Law Working Paper Series. Nijmegen: Centre for Migration Law.
66.
TerrioS (2004) Migration, displacement, and violence: Prosecuting Romanian street children at the Paris Palace of Justice. International Migration42: 5–33.
67.
TerrioS (2008) New barbarians at the gates of Paris? Prosecuting undocumented minors in the juvenile court—The problem of the ‘Petits Roumains’. Anthropological Quarterly81: 873–901.
68.
TerrioSJ (2009) Judging Mohammed: Juvenile Delinquency, Immigration, and Exclusion at the Paris Palace of Justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
69.
TurnellAEdwardsS (1999) Signs of Safety: A Solution and Safety Oriented Approach to Child Protection Casework. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
70.
UrciuoliB (2010) Entextualizing diversity: Semiotic incoherence in institutional discourse. Language & Communication30: 48–57.
71.
Van BaarH (2012) Socio-economic mobility and neo-liberal governmentality in post-socialist Europe: Activation and the dehumanisation of the Roma. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies38: 1289–1304.
72.
Van DaeleSVander BekenTDe RuyverB (2008) Rondtrekkende dadergroepen: een empirische toets. Panopticon29(4): 25–39.
73.
VermeerschP (2002) Ethnic mobilisation and the political conditionality of European Union accession: The case of the Roma in Slovakia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies1: 83–101.
74.
VermeerschP (2012) Reframing the Roma: EU initiatives and the politics of reinterpretation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies38: 1195–1212.
