You are on the new improved site. You can view the old site in view-only mode here until June 27, 2026

Filter Results

Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal

Search this journal

Enter search terms…

Advanced search

/

About

About Sage
About Sage Journals
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Contact Us
Help

Information for

Authors
Editors
Librarians
Researchers
Reviewers
Frequently asked questions

All content on this site: Copyright © 2026 Sage Publications. All rights reserved. This website is technically supported and operated by China National Publications Import and Export (Group) Co., Ltd. 京ICP备09090397号-11

Youth Justice News

Youth Justice

Impact Factor: 1.9 / 5-Year Impact Factor: 2.3

Journal Homepage Submission guidelines

Restricted access

News

First published online December, 2015

Youth Justice News

Volume 15, Issue 3

https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225415610995

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1.

Bateman

T

(2012) American Supreme Court rules sentencing of juveniles to life imprisonment without the prospect of parole unconstitutional. Youth Justice 12(3): 261–262.

2.

Stone

N

(2014) Legal commentary. General deterrence: A valid objective in youth justice? Youth Justice 14(2): 186–191.

Browse journal

Current issue OnlineFirst All issues

Similar articles

Retricted access

Reviews : Crimefighters of London: A History of the Origins and Development of the London Probation Service 1876 - 1965 Martin Page Inner London Probation Service Benevolent and Educational Trust,1992;£8.50 pbk

Retricted access

Veteran offenders in Cheshire

Retricted access

Presidential Address

Retricted access