‘It’s harder to go to court yourself because you don’t really know what to expect’: Reducing the negative effects of court exposure on young people – Findings from an Evaluation in Scotland
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2016
‘It’s harder to go to court yourself because you don’t really know what to expect’: Reducing the negative effects of court exposure on young people – Findings from an Evaluation in Scotland
In Scotland, the Whole System Approach to preventing and reducing offending includes the provision of court support for young people under 18 years. This article outlines the insights from an evaluation of one Scottish local authority’s support service. Semi-structured interviews conducted with 26 participants were combined with observation of interactions between support workers and young people, with some additional follow-up statistical analysis of key outcomes. The insights suggest that the court support helped to reassure young people and make them more aware of their rights. It helped many young people to avoid receiving custodial sentences, meet bail conditions, reflect upon their offending behaviour and begin to make alternative choices.
Audit Scotland (2012) Reducing Reoffending in Scotland. Edinburgh: Audit Scotland.
2.
BarryM (2006) Youth Offending in Transition: The Search for Social Recognition. London: Routledge.
3.
BarryM (2013) Desistance by design: Offenders’ reflections on criminal justice theory, policy and practice. European Journal of Probation5(2): 47–65.
4.
BurneyE (2009) Making People Behave: Anti-Social Behaviour, Politics and Policy. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
5.
CarlssonC (2012) Using ‘turning points’ to understand processes of change in offending. British Journal of Criminology52: 1–16.
6.
CleghornNKinsellaRMcNaughton NichollsC (2011) Engaging with the Views of Young People with Experience of the Youth Justice System. London: The Police Foundation, NatCen and Paul Hamlyn Foundation.
7.
CorrM-L (2014) Young people’s offending careers and criminal justice contact: A case for social justice. Youth Justice14(3): 255–268.
8.
DeucharR (2010) ‘It’s just pure harassment … as if it’s a crime to walk in the street’: Anti-social behaviour, youth justice and citizenship – The reality for young men in h east end of Glasgow. Youth Justice10(3): 258–274.
GattiUTremblayRVitaroF (2009) Iatrogenic effect of juvenile justice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry50(8): 991–998.
11.
GoldR (1958) Roles in sociological field observation. Social Forces36: 217–223.
12.
GoldsonB (2010) The sleep of (criminological)reason: Knowledge-policy rupture and New Labour’s youth justice legacy. Criminology and Criminal Justice10(2): 155−178.
13.
GrissoT (2003) What we know about youths’ capacities as trial defendants. In: GrissoTSchwartzRG (eds) Youth on Trial: A Developmental Perspective on Juvenile Justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 139–172.
14.
HainesKCaseSDaviesKCharlesA (2013) The Swansea Bureau: A model of diversion from the Youth Justice System. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice41(2): 167–187.
15.
HazelNHagellABrazierL (2002) Young Offenders’ Perceptions of their Experiences in the Criminal Justice System. London: Policy Research Bureau.
16.
HolliganCDeucharR (2015) What does it mean to be a man? Psychosocial undercurrents in the voices of incarcerated (violent) Scottish teenage offenders. Criminology and Criminal Justice15(3): 361–377.
17.
HuebnerBMVaranoSPBynumTS (2007) Gangs, guns and drugs: Recidivism among serious, young offenders. Criminology and Public Policy6(2): 187–222.
18.
HuizingaDSchumannKEhretBElliotA (2003) The effects of Juvenile justice processing on subsequent delinquent and criminal behaviour: A cross-national study. Final Report to the National Institute of Justice, April. Washington, DC.
19.
KilkellyU (2008) Youth courts and children’s rights: The Irish experience. Youth Justice8(1): 39–56.
20.
LaubJHSampsonRJ (2003) Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent Boys to Age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
McAraLMcVieS (2007) Youth justice? The impact of system contact on patterns of desistance from offending. European Journal of Criminology4(3): 315–345.
22.
McNeillF (2009) What works and what’s just?European Journal of Probation1(1): 21–40.
23.
McNeillFMarunaS (2008) Giving up and giving back: Desistance, generativity and social work with offenders. In: McIvorGRaynorR (eds) Developments in Social Work with Offenders. London: Jessica Kingsley, 224–239.
24.
MuncieJ (2008) The ‘Punitive turn’ in Juvenile justice: Cultures of control and rights compliance in Western Europe and the USA. Youth Justice8(2): 107–121.
25.
MuncieJ (2009) Youth and Crime, 3rd Edition.London: Sage.
26.
PetitclercAGattiUVitaroFTremblayRE (2013) Effects of juvenile court exposure on crime in young adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry54(3): 291–297.
27.
PetrosinoATurpin-PetrosinoCGuckenburgS (2010) Formal System Processing of Juveniles: Effects on Delinquency. Campbell Systematic Reviews. Woburn, Mass; The Campbell Collaboration.
28.
RexS (1999) Desistance from offending: Experiences of probation. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice36(4): 366–383.
