A national Swedish project was followed in 12 municipalities aimed at youth aged 15–20 years. Neither police nor social services systematically used the indicators based on criminological research and proposed by national authorities. The police and social services thought they had more contemporary and holistic intuitive knowledge than any systematic indicators could provide. Despite implementation difficulties, the project was described as a success at the political level and widely dispersed. The specific and systematic image of early indicators provided momentum at the policy level. The local authorities welcomed the opportunity to reach a group considered difficult to manage.
AskB (2011) Ny satsning mot ungdomsbrott. Svenska Dagbladet, 3March.
2.
BoxenbaumEJonssonS (2008) Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. In: GreenwoodR (ed.) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage, 79–98.
3.
BrameRPaternosterRPiqueroA (2012) Thoughts on the analysis of group-based developmental trajectories in criminology. Justice Quarterly4(29): 469–490.
4.
DayDNielsenJWardASunYRosenthalJDuchesneTBevcIRossmanL (2012) Long-term follow-up of criminal activity with adjudicated youth in Ontario: Identifying offence trajectories and predictors/correlates of trajectory group membership. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice4(54): 377–413.
5.
Edvall-MalmD (2012) Det socio-polisiära handlingsnätet: Om kopplingar mellan polis och socialtjänstkring ungdomars kriminalitet och missbruk. PhD Thesis, University of Umeå, Umeå.
6.
EstradaF (2004) The transformation of the politics of crime in high crime societies. European Journal of Criminology4(1): 419–443.
FarringtonD (2005) Early identification and preventive interventions: How effective is this strategy?Criminology & Public Policy4(2): 237–248.
9.
FarringtonD (2012) Should the Juvenile justice system be involved in early intervention?Criminology & Public Policy11(2): 265–273.
10.
GarlandD (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Great Britain: Oxford University Press.
11.
GranathS (2007) Rättsliga reaktioner på ungdomsbrott 1980–2005: påföljdsval, uppsåtsbedömningar och kriminalpolitik: en kriminologisk analys. PhD Thesis, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.
12.
HansenBVedungE (2010) Theory-based stakeholder evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation3(31): 295–313.
13.
HelgessonL (2013) Succéprojektet som utvärderades – med felaktiga siffror. Radio-program in Swedish National Radio P1 (1October2013, 12:00 o’clock).
14.
HillMHupeP (2009) Implementing Public Policy: An Introduction to the Study of Operational Governance, 2nd Edition.Los Angeles, CA: CITE.
15.
HsiehHShannonS (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research15(9): 1277–1288.
16.
KingdonJ (2011) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd Edition.Boston, MA: Longman.
17.
KoppenjanJKlijnE (2004) Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making. London: Routledge.
18.
LeiseringLWalkerR (1998) The Dynamics of Modern Society: Poverty, Policy and Welfare. Bristol: Policy Press.
19.
LipskyM (2010) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (ed. 30th anniversary expanded) New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
20.
LoeberRFarringtonD (2000) Young children who commit crime: Epidemiology, developmental origins, risk factors, early interventions, and policy implications. Development & Psychopathology12(4): 737–762.
21.
McAraLMcVieS (2007) Youth justice?European Journal of Criminology4(3): 315–345.
22.
MeyerJRowanB (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology (2): 340–363.
23.
MoffittT (1993) Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review100(4): 674
24.
MoffittT (1997) Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent offending: A complementary pair of developmental theories. In: ThornberryT (ed.) Developmental Theories of Crime and Delinquency. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 11–54.
25.
MuncieJ (2006) Governing young people: Coherence and contradiction in contemporary youth justice. Critical Social Policy26(4): 770–793.
26.
National Board of Health and Welfare (2012) Samverkan i sociala insatsgrupper – vägledning i lokalt arbete i syfte att motverka en kriminell livsstil bland unga. Report. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.
27.
National Police Board (2011) Åtagande. Stockholm: National Police Board.
28.
National Police Board (2012) Checklista. Stockholm: National Police Board.
29.
O’MahonyP (2009) The risk factors prevention paradigm and the causes of youth crime: A deceptively useful analysis?Youth Justice9(2): 99–114.
30.
PetersGPierreJ (2010) Public-private partnerships and the democratic deficit: Is performance-based legitimacy the answer? In: BexellMMorthU (eds) Democracy and Public-Private Partnerships in Global Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 41–54.
31.
RittelHWebberM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences4(2): 155–169.
32.
SabatierP (ed.) (2007) Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
33.
SampsonRLaubJ (2005) A life-course view of the development of crime. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social602: 12–45.
34.
SkardhamarT (2009) Reconsidering the theory on adolescent-limited and life-course persistent anti-social behaviour. British Journal of Criminology49(6): 863–878.
35.
SOU (2010) Kriminella grupperingar: motverka rekrytering och underlätta avhopp. Swedish government official report2010:15, Stockholm: Fritzes.
36.
Swedish National Police Commissioner (Svensson B) and Knape A (2012) Insatsgrupper kan hejda ungdomsbrott. Svenska Dagbladet, 31October.
37.
TashakkoriATeddlieC (2003) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
ThamHvon HoferH (2009) Individual prediction and crime trends. European Journal of Criminology4: 313–335.
39.
ThornberryT (2005) Explaining multiple patterns of offending across the life course and across generations. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social (602): 156–195.
40.
TseloniAMailleyJFarrellGTilleyN (2010) Exploring the international decline in crime rates. European Journal of Criminology7(5): 375–394.
41.
WacquantL (2001) The penalization of poverty and the rise of neo-liberalism. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research (9): 401–412.
42.
WestfeltLEstradaF (2005) International crime trends: Sources of comparative crime data and postwar trends in Western Europe. In: SheptyckiJWardakA (eds) Transnational and Comparative Criminology in a Global Context. London: Cavendish Publishing, 19–48.
43.
WollterFKassmanAOscarssonL (2013) Utvärdering av sociala insatsgrupper. Individinriktad samverkan kring unga i riskzonen. Report for Swedish National Police Board. Report no 2013:1, Stockholm: National Police Board.
