Popularism and Punishment or Rights and Rehabilitation? Electoral Discourse and Structural Policy Narratives on Youth Justice: Westminster Elections,1964−2010
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2015
Popularism and Punishment or Rights and Rehabilitation? Electoral Discourse and Structural Policy Narratives on Youth Justice: Westminster Elections,1964−2010
This study explores the formative origins of youth justice policy and the discursive process of mandate-seeking in party manifestos in Westminster elections. Analysis of issue salience and policy framing reveals: party politicization, a significant increase in issue salience from the 1990s onwards, and a shifting structural policy narrative with inherent contestation and contradictions. The past decade has seen some attempts to revisit pre-1970s welfarist approaches following an extended emphasis on criminalization, incarceration and punishment. This discursive shift has presaged an impressive reduction in levels of incarceration and numbers sentenced, yet international and historical comparative data suggest party programmes need to place continuing emphasis on diversion if full compatibility with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child is to be secured.
AllenB (2002) There must be some way of dealing with kids: Young offenders, public attitudes and policy change. Youth Justice2(3): 3–13.
2.
AmanI (2009) Discourse and striving for power: An analysis of Barisan Nasional’s 2004 Malaysian general election manifesto. Discourse and Society20(6): 659–684.
3.
ArmstrongD (2004) A risky business? Research, policy, governmentality and youth offending. Youth Justice4(2): 100–116.
4.
BaileyRWilliamsB (2000) Inter-agency Partnerships in Youth Justice: Implementing the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. Sheffield, England: Sheffield University, Social Service Monographs/Community Care.
5.
BoardleyIKavussanuM (2010) Effects of goal orientation and perceived value of toughness on antisocial behavior in soccer: The mediating role of moral disengagement. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology32: 176–192.
6.
BudgeIHofferbertR (1990) Mandates and policy outputs: US party platforms and federal expenditures. The American Political Science Review84(1): 111–131.
7.
CarterN (2006) Party politicization of the environment in Britain. Party Politics12(6): 747–767.
8.
CaseS (2007) Questioning the ‘evidence’ of risk that underpins evidence-led youth justice. Youth Justice, 7(2): 91–105.
9.
CobbRWRossMH (1997) Agenda setting and the denial of agenda access: Key concepts. In: CobbRWRossMH (eds) Cultural Strategies of Agenda Denial. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
10.
CohenB (1963) The Press and Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
CohenS (1972) Folk Devils and Moral Panics. London: MacGibbon and Kee.
12.
Conservative Party (1964) Prosperity with a Purpose. London: Conservative Party.
13.
Conservative Party (1966) Action Not Words: The New Conservative Programme. London: Conservative Party.
14.
Conservative Party (1974) Putting Britain First. London, Conservative Party.
15.
Conservative Party (1979) Conservative Party General Election Manifesto. London: Conservative Party.
16.
Conservative Party (1983) The Challenge of Times, London: Conservative Party.
17.
Conservative Party (1987) The Next Moves Forward. London: Conservative Party.
18.
Conservative Party (1992) The Best Future for Britain. London: Conservative Party.
19.
Conservative Party (1997) A Better Tomorrow. London: Conservative Party.
20.
Conservative Party (2001) Time for Common Sense. London: Conservative Party.
21.
Conservative Party (2005) Are You Thinking What We’re Thinking? It’s Time for Action. London: Conservative Party.
22.
Conservative Party (2010) An invitation to join the government of Britain. London: Conservative Party.
CreedWLangstraatJScullyM (2002) Picture of the frame: Frame analysis as technique and as politics. Organizational Research Methods5(1): 34–55.
25.
De VreeseCPeterJSemetkoH (2001) Framing politics at the launch of the Euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication18(2): 107–122.
26.
DoobATonryM (2004) Varieties of youth justice, crime and justice. Youth Crime and Youth Justice: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives27(4): 1–20.
27.
DownesDMorganR (2012) British general elections and law and order. In: MaguireMMorganRReinerR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
EdwardsG (2012) A comparative discourse analysis of the construction of ‘in-groups’ in the 2005 and 2010 manifestos of the British National Party. Discourse and Society23(3): 245–258.
29.
FearonJ (1999) Electoral accountability and the control of politicians: Selecting good types versus sanctioning poor performance. In: Adam PrzeworskiAStokesSCManinB (eds) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
FischerFForresterJ (1993) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, DC: Duke University Press.
31.
FranklinB (2002) The New Handbook of Children’s Rights: Comparative Policy and Practice. London: Routledge.
32.
GarsideRSilvestriAMillsH (2013) Third sector involvement in criminal justice outsourcing. UK Justice Policy Review3(1): 20–21.
33.
GelsthorpeLMorrisA (2002) Restorative youth justice? The last vestiges of welfare. In: MuncieJHughesGMcLaughlinE (eds) Youth Justice: Critical Readings. London, Sage Publications.
34.
GoldsonB (1997) Children, crime, policy and practice: Neither welfare nor justice. Children and Society11(2): 77–88.
35.
GoldsonBHughesG (2010) Sociological criminology and youth justice: Comparative policy analysis and academic intervention. Criminology and Criminal Justice10(2): 211–230.
36.
GoldsonBMuncieJ (2006) Youth Crime and Justice. London, Sage Publications.
37.
GouldR (2000) ‘Integration’, ‘solidarität ‘ and the discourses of national identity in the 1998 Bundestag election manifestos, German Life and Letters53(4): 529–551.
38.
GrayAJenkinsB (1982) Policy analysis in British central government: The experience of PAR. Public Administration60(4): 429–450.
39.
HainesKDrakefordM (1998) Young People and Youth Justice. London: Macmillan.
40.
HamiltonC (2014) Reconceptualizing penality: Towards a multidimensional measure of punitiveness. British Journal of Criminology54(2): 321–343.
41.
HarrisR (1982) Institutionalized ambivalence: Social work and the Children and Young Persons Act 1969. British Journal of Social Work12(1): 247–263.
HoodC (1991) A public management for all seasons?Public Administration69(1): 3–19.
44.
Independent Commission on Youth Crime and Antisocial Behaviour (2010) Time for a Fresh Start. London: The Police Foundation.
45.
JacobsonJKirbyA (2012) Public Attitudes to Youth Crime: Report on Focus Group Research, Occasional Paper 105. London: Home Office.
46.
JoffeDYardleyH (2003) Content and thematic analysis. In: MarksDYardleyH (eds) Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology, London: Sage Publications.
47.
JonesD (2001) Questioning New Labour’s Youth Justice Strategy: A review article. Youth Justice1: 14–26.
48.
Junger-TasJDeckerS (2008) International Handbook of Juvenile Justice. New York: Springer.
49.
Kohler RiessmanC (2008) Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
50.
KrinskyC (2008) Moral Panics over Contemporary Children and Youth. Farnham: Ashgate.
Labour Party (1970) Now Britain’s Strong: Let’s Make It Great to Live In. London: Labour Party.
53.
Labour Party (1997) Because Britain Deserves Better. London: Labour Party.
54.
Labour Party (2001) Ambitions for Britain. London: Labour Party.
55.
Labour Party (2005) Britain Forward, Not Back. London: Labour Party.
56.
Labour Party (2010) A Fair Future for All. London: Labour Party.
57.
Liberal Democrats (1997) Make the Difference. London: Liberal Democrats.
58.
LibbrechtLMaddensBSwendenWFabreE (2009) Issue salience in regional party manifestos in Spain. European Journal of Political Research48(1): 58–79.
59.
Liberal Democrats (1992) Changing Britain for Good. London: Liberal Democrats.
60.
McIntoshBPhillipsA (2011) Understanding the demonised generation. Criminal Justice Matters83(1): 28–30.
61.
McLaughlinKFerlieEOsborneS (2001) New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects. London, Routledge.
62.
McVieS (2011) Alternative models of youth justice: lessons from Scotland and Northern Ireland. Journal of Children’s Services6(2): 106–114.
63.
MainesD (1993) Narrative’s moment and sociology’s phenomena: Toward a narrative sociology. Sociological Quarterly34(1): 17–38.
64.
MeyersMKGlaserBDonaldKM (1998) On the front lines of welfare delivery: Are workers implementing policy reforms?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management17(1): 22–31.
65.
Ministry of Justice (2014) Youth Justice Statistics: 2012/13 England and Wales, Youth Justice Board/ Ministry of Justice Statistics Bulletin. London: MoJ/ YJB.
66.
MooreS (2000) Child incarceration and the new youth justice. In: GoldsonB (ed.) The New Youth Justice. Lyme Regis: Russell House Publishing.
67.
MorganRNewburnT (2012) Youth crime and justice: Rediscovering devolution, discretion and diversion. In: MaguireMMorganRReinerR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68.
MuncieJ (2004) Youth and Crime. London: Sage Publications.
69.
MuncieJ (2008) The ‘punitive turn’ in juvenile justice: Cultures of control and rights compliance in Western Europe and the USA. Youth Justice8(2): 107–121.
70.
NelsonTOxleyaZ (1999) Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. The Journal of Politics61(4): 1040–1067.
71.
NewburnT (1996) Back to the future, youth crime, youth justice and the rediscovery of ‘authoritarian popularism’. In: PilcherJWaggS (eds) Thatcher’s Children?: Politics, Childhood And Society in the 1980s And 1990s. London: Routledge.
72.
NewburnT (1998) Tackling youth grime and reforming youth justice: The origins and nature of ‘new labour’ policy. Policy Studies19(3–4): 199–212.
73.
PapacharissiZ (2008) News frames terrorism: A comparative analysis of frames employed in terrorism coverage in US and UK newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics13(1): 52–74.
74.
PeckJ (2008) Remaking laissez-faire. Progress in Human Geography32(1): 3–43.
75.
PetersenAMcCabeA (1983) Developmental Psycholinguistics. New York: Plenum.
76.
PetrocikJ (1996) Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science40(3): 825–850.
77.
PickfordJDugmoreP (2012) Youth Justice and Social Work. London: Learning Matters.
78.
PiperC (2001) Who are these youths? Language in the service of policy. Youth Justice1(2): 30–39.
79.
PittsJ (1988) The Politics of Juvenile Crime. London: Sage Publications.
80.
PittsJ (1998) The New Politics of Youth Crime: Discipline or Solidarity?Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
81.
PittsJ (2001) Korrectional karaoke: New Labour and the zombification of youth justice. Youth Justice1(3): 3–14.
82.
PrattJ (2002) Corporatism: The third model of juvenile justice. In: McLaughlinEMuncieJ (eds) Youth Justice: A Reader. London: Sage Publications, 404–412.
83.
PrattJBrownDBrownMHallsworthS.MorrisonW (2005) The New Punitiveness: Trends, Theories, Perspectives. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
84.
PrzeworskiAStokesSManinB (1999) Elections and representation. In: PrzeworskiAStokesSManinB (eds) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85.
PughM (2011) Speak for Britain!: A New History of the Labour Party. London: Vintage Books.
86.
RePassD (1971) Issue salience and party choice. American Political Science Review65(1): 389–400.
87.
RobertsonD (1976) A Theory of Party Competition. New York: Wiley.
88.
RoyedT (1996) Testing the mandate model in Britain and in the United States: Evidence from the Reagan and Thatcher eras. British Journal of Political Science26(1): 56–69.
89.
RutherfordA (2002) Youth justice and social inclusion. Youth Justice2(2): 100–107.
90.
SchönDReinM (1994) Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
91.
ScratonPHaydonD (2002) Challenging the criminalisation of children and young people: Securing a rights-based agenda. In: MuncieJHughesGMcLaughlinE (eds) Youth Justice: Critical Readings. London, Sage Publications, 311–328.
92.
SmithD (2011) A New Response to Youth Crime. London: Willan Publishing.
93.
SmithDUttingD (2011) Reforming the response to youth crime: From evidence to implementation. Journal of Children’s Services6(2): 67–76.
Social Democratic Party (1987) Britain United: The Time Has Come. London: SDP.
96.
StewartJ (2002) Will best value survive?Public Money and Management22(2): 4–5.
97.
TonkissF (2004) Analysing text and speech: Content and discourse analysis. In: SearleA (ed.) Researching Society and Culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
98.
TonryM (2004) Punishment and Politics: Evidence and Emulation in the Making of English Crime Control Policy. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
99.
UngarS (2001) Moral panic versus the risk society: The implications of the changing sites of social anxiety. The British Journal of Sociology52: 271–291.
100.
VolkensA (2001) Manifesto research since 1979: From reliability to validity. In: LaverM (ed.) Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors. London: Routledge.
101.
WalgraveL (2004) Youth crime and youth justice: Comparative and cross-national perspectives. Crime and Justice31: 543–597.
102.
WelchMPriceEYankeyN (2002) Moral panic over youth violence Wilding and the manufacture of menace in the media. Youth & Society34(1): 3–30.
103.
YatesJ (2012) What prospects youth justice? Children in trouble in the age of austerity. Social Policy & Administration46: 432–447.
104.
YoungJ (1999) The Exclusive Society. London: Sage Publications.
