In an effort to better understand the roots of contemporary school punishment practices, this study compares policy discourse and practice of school punishment and security in the United States and England. American policy discourse is predominantly punitive, harsh punishment strategies are favored, and policy makers have centralized decision-making power outside of the classroom. Contrastingly, English policy discourse about and policy responses to student misbehaviour focus more on reducing social exclusion, improving student behaviour, and returning the locus of control over rule enforcement to teachers. However, despite these substantial differences, suspension and expulsion rates are fairly similar in the US and England. Several hypotheses to explain these findings are offered.
AkibaMLeTendreGKBakerDPGoeslingB (2002) Student victimization: National and school system effects on school violence in 37 nations. American Educational Research Journal39: 829–853.
2.
ArumRVelezM (eds) (2012) Improving Learning Outcomes: School Discipline and Student Achievement in Comparative Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3.
BrillS (2009) The rubber room: The battle over New York City’s worst teacher. The New Yorker31August.
CasellaR (2001) Being Down: Challenging Violence in Urban Schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
CasellaR (2006) Selling Us the Fortres: The Promotion of Techno-Security Equipment for Schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
CavadinoMDignanJ (2006) Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach. London: Sage Publications.
8.
CraigWHarel-FischYFogel-GrinvaldHDostalerSHetlandJSimons-MortonBMolchoMGaspar de MatoMOverpeckMDuePPickettW (2009) A Cross-National profile of Bullying and Victimization among Adolescents in 40 Countries. International Journal of Public Health54: 216–224.
DunbarCVillaruelF (2004) What a difference a community makes: Urban and rural school leaders and the implementation of zero tolerance. Equity and Excellence37: 351–359.
15.
FabeloTThompsonMPlotkinMCarmichalDMarbanksMBoothE (2011) Breaking Schools’ Rules: A Statewide Study of How School Discipline Relates to Students’ Success and Juvenile Justice Involvement. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center and Public Policy Research Institute.
16.
FineMBurnsAPayneYTorreM (2004) Civics lessons: The color and class of betrayal. Teachers College Record106: 2193–2223.
GarlandD (2001) Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
GoldsonBHughesG (2010a) Comparative youth justice research and the policy process. Criminology & Criminal Justice10: 117–118.
20.
GoldsonBHughesG (2010b) Sociological criminology and youth justice: Comparative policy analysis and academic intervention. Criminology & Criminal Justice10: 211–230.
21.
GoldsonBMuncieJ (eds) (2006) Youth Crime and Justice. London: Sage Publications.
22.
GordonA (2001) School exclusions in England: Children’s voices and adult solutions?Educational Studies27: 69–85.
23.
GreenD (2007) Comparing penal cultures: Two responses to child-on-child homicide. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research36: 591–643.
24.
GreenD (2008a) Political culture and incentives to penal populism In: Kury H (ed.)Fear of Crime – Punitivity: New Developments in Theory and Research. Bochum, Germany: Universitätsverlag Brockmeyer, 251–276.
25.
GreenD (2008b) When Children Kill Children: Penal Populism and Political Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
HarberC (2004) Schooling as Violence: How Schools Harm Pupils and Societies. New York: Routledge.
27.
HirschfieldP (2008) Preparing for prison: The criminalization of school discipline in the USA. Theoretical Criminology12: 79–101.
28.
HirschfieldPCelinskaK (2011) Beyond fear: Sociological perspectives on the criminalization of school discipline. Sociology Compass5: 1–12.
29.
InsleyA (2001) Suspending and expelling children from educational opportunities: Time to reevaluate zero tolerance policies. American University Law Review50: 1039–1074.
30.
JonesTNewburnT (2006) Policy Transfer and Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
KupchikA (2010) Homeroom Security: School Discipline in an Age of Fear. New York: New York University Press.
33.
KupchikAMonahanT (2006) The New American School: Preparation for post-industrial discipline. British Journal of Sociology of Education27: 617–632.
34.
LaceyN (2008) The Prisoners’ Dilemma: Political Economy and Punishment in Contemporary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Lappi-SeppäläT (2007) Penal policy in Scandinavia. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research36: 217–295. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Lappi-SeppäläT (2008) Trust, welfare, and political culture: Explaining differences in national penal policies. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research37: 313–387.
37.
LijphartA (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
38.
LosekeD (2003) Thinking about Social Problems: An Introduction to Constructionist Perspectives. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
39.
LyonsWDrewJ (2006) Punishing Schools: Fear and Citizenship in American Public Education. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
40.
MuncieJ (2006) Repenalisation and rights: Explorations in comparative youth criminology. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice45: 42–70.
MuncieJGoldsonB (2006b) States of transition: Convergence and diversity in international youth justice. In: MuncieJGoldsonB (eds) Comparative Youth Justice. London: Sage Publications, 196–218.
43.
NolanK (2011) Police in the Hallway: Discipline in an Urban High School. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Ofsted (2008) Reducing Exclusions of Black Pupils from Secondary Schools: Examples of Good Practice. Reference no: 070240. London: Department for Education.
46.
RiosVM (2011) Punished: Policing the Lives of Black and Latino BoysNew York: NYU Press.
47.
RobersSZhangJTrumanJSnyderT (2012) Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2011. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics and US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
48.
RothmanD (1980) Conscience and Convenience: The Asylum and its Alternatives in Progressive America. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
49.
SchwartzRReiserL (2001) Zero tolerance as mandatory sentencing. In: AyersWDohrnBAyersR (eds) Zero Tolerance: Resisting the Drive for Punishment in our Schools New York. New York: The New Press, 126–135.
50.
SimonJ (2007) Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press.
51.
SkibaRNoamG (eds) (2002). Zero Tolerance: Can Suspension and Expulsion Keep Schools Safe?New York: Jossey Bass.
52.
SkibaRReynoldsCGrahamSSherasPConoleyJGarcia-VazquezE (2006) Are Zero Tolerance Policies Effective in the Schools? An Evidentiary Review and Recommendations. Report by the American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
53.
SobelR (2012) Perception of violence on a high school campus. Journal of Applied Security Research7: 11–21.
StrömbäckJØrstenMAalbergT (2008) Political communication in the Nordic countries: An introduction. In: StrömbäckJØrstenMAalbergT (eds) Communicating Politics: Political Communication in the Nordic Countries . Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom, 11–24.
57.
TaylorE (2010) I spy with my little eye: The use of CCTV in schools and the impact on privacy. The Sociological Review58: 381–405.
58.
TonryM (2009) Explanations of American punishment policies: A national history. Punishment & Society11: 377–394.
United Kingdom Department for Education (2011) Permanent and Fixed Period Exclusions from Schools and Exclusion Appeals in England. Statistical First Release. London: Department for Education.
US Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights and the Children’s Defense Fund of the Washington Research Project, School Suspensions (1975). Available at: http://ocrdata.ed.gov/State-NationalEstimations
