As the US reins in the punitive excesses in juvenile justice with encouraging changes, it may be tempting to herald a new era of progressive reform. This article contends that such optimism may be premature, and identifies three persistent problems within the US juvenile justice system, which left unexamined, promise to perpetuate a ‘punitive legacy’ that will impede progressive change. The ideology of ‘callous self-sufficiency’, ongoing neglect of youth welfare and human rights, and the logic of risk management and cost-effectiveness each encourage harmful practices, and they work individually and collectively to create a climate inhospitable to lasting progressive transformation.
AryaN (2011) State Trends: Legislative Victories from 2005 to 2010 Removing Youth from the Adult Criminal Justice System. Washington, DC: Campaign for Youth Justice.
5.
AustinJKrisbergB (1981) Wider, stronger, and different nets: The dialectics of criminal justice reform. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency18(1): 165–196.
6.
BellJRidolfiL (2010) Adoration of the Question: Reflections on the Failure to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Juvenile Justice System. San Francisco, CA: Haywood Burns Institute.
7.
BernardT (1992) The Cycle of Juvenile Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
BishopD (2004) Injustice and irrationality in contemporary youth policy. Criminology and Public Policy3(4): 633–644.
9.
ButtsJMitchellO (2000) Brick by brick: Dismantling the border between juvenile and adult justice. In: FrielC (ed.) Criminal Justice 2000: Boundary Changes in Criminal Justice Vol. 2. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
10.
Children’s Defense Fund (2014) The State of America’s Children Yearbook. Washington, DC: Children’s Defense Fund.
11.
ClarkeJ (2002a) Whose justice? The politics of juvenile control. In: MuncieJHughesGMcLaughlinE (eds) Youth Justice: Critical Readings. London: Sage Publications.
12.
ClarkeJ (2002b) The three Rs − repression, rescue and rehabilitation: Ideologies of control for working class youth. In: MuncieJHughesGMcLaughlinE (eds) Youth Justice: Critical Readings. London: Sage Publications.
13.
CohenS (1985) Visions of Social Control: Crime, Punishment, and Classification. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
CurrieE (1985) Confronting Crime: An American Challenge. New York: Pantheon Books.
15.
CurrieE (1998) Crime and Punishment in America. New York: Metropolitan Books.
16.
CurrieE (2004) The Road to Whatever: Middle-class Culture and the Crisis of Adolescence. New York: Henry Holt.
17.
CurrieE (2009) The Roots of Danger: Violent Crime in Global Perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
DillardD (2013) Limited disproportionate minority contact discourse may explain limited progress in reducing minority over-representation in the US juvenile justice system. Youth Justice13(3): 207–217.
19.
FarringtonDWelshB (2007) Saving Children from a Life of Crime: Early Risk Factors and Effective Interventions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
GrayP (2005) The politics of risk and young offenders: Experiences of social exclusion and restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology45(6): 938–957.
21.
GrayP (2009) The political economy of risk and the new governance of youth crime. Punishment & Society11(4): 443–458.
22.
GrayP (2011) Youth custody, resettlement and the right to social justice. Youth Justice11(3): 235–249.
23.
GriffinPAddieSAdamsBFirestineK ( 2011) Trying Juveniles as Adults: An Analysis of State Transfer Laws and Reporting. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
24.
HainesKO’MahonyD (2006) Restorative approaches, young people and youth justice. In: GoldsonBMuncieJ (eds) Youth Crime and Justice. London: Sage Publications.
25.
HarlowC (2003) Education and correctional populations. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
26.
HowellJFeldBMearsDFarringtonDLoeberRPetechuckD (2013) Bulletin 5: Young Offenders and an Effective Response in the Juvenile and Adult Justice Systems: What Happens, What Should Happen, and What We Need to Know (Study Group on the Transitions between Juvenile Delinquency and Adult Crime). National Criminal Justice Reference Service. Available at: https://ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/242935.pdf (accessed 22 March 2014).
27.
KemshallH (2008) Risks, rights and justice: Understanding and responding to youth risk. Youth Justice8(1): 21–37.
28.
KimCLosenDHewittD (2010) The School to Prison Pipeline. New York: New York University Press.
29.
KrisbergBVuongLHartneyCMarchionnaS (2010) A New Era in California Juvenile Justice. OPakland, CA: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
30.
KupchickA (2006) Juding Juveniles: Prosecuting Adolescents in Adult and Juvenile Courts. New York: New York University Press.
31.
LipseyM (2009) The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims & Offenders4(2): 124–147.
32.
LipseyMCullenF (2007) The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law & Social Science3: 297–320
33.
LipseyMHowellJ (2012) A broader view of evidence-based programs reveals more options for state juvenile justice systems. Criminology and Public Policy11(3): 515–523.
34.
LipseyMHowellJKellyMChapmanGCarverD (2010) Improving the Effectiveness of Juvenile Justice Programs: A New Perspective on Evidence-based Practice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, Center for Juvenile Justice Reform.
35.
ListwanSJJonsonCCullenFLatessaE (2008) Cracks in the penal harm movement: Evidence from the field. Criminology & Public Policy7 (3): 423–465.
36.
LoeberRWeiEStouthamer-LoeberMHuizingaDThornberryT (1999) Behavioral antecedents to serious and violent offending: Joint analysis from the Denver youth survey, Pittsburgh youth study and the Rochester youth development study. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention8 (2): 245–263.
37.
MinowM (1987) The public duties of families and children. In: HartmanF (ed.) The Role of the Juvenile Court. New York: Springer-Verlag.
38.
MumolaC (2005) Suicide and homicide in state prisons and local jails. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
39.
MuncieJ (2001) Policy transfers and ‘what works’: Some reflections on comparative youth justice. Youth Justice1(3): 27–35.
40.
MuncieJ (2006) Governing young people: Coherence and contradiction in contemporary youth justice. Critical Social Policy26(4): 770–793.
41.
MuncieJHughesG (2002) Modes of youth governance: Political rationalities, criminalization and resistance. In: MuncieJHughesGMcLaughlinE (eds) Youth Justice: Critical Readings. London: Sage Publications.
42.
MyersR (2013) The biographical and psychic consequences of ‘welfare inaction’ for young women in trouble with the law. Youth Justice13(3): 218–233.
43.
MyersRGoddardT (2013) Community-driven youth justice and the organizational consequences of coercive governance. British Journal of Criminology53(2): 215–233.
PhoenixJKellyL (2013) ‘You have to do it for yourself’: Responsibilization in youth justice and young people’s situated knowledge of youth justice practice. British Journal of Criminology53(3): 419–437.
46.
PlattA (1977) The Child Savers: The Invention of Delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
PlattA (2002) The triumph of benevolence: The origins of the juvenile justice system in the United States. In: MuncieJHughesGMcLaughlinE (eds) Youth Justice: Critical Readings. London: Sage Publications.
48.
PrattTCullenF (2005) Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. Crime and Justice. 32: 373–450.
49.
PuzzancheraC (2013) Juvenile Arrests 2011. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
50.
RiosV (2006) The hyper-criminalization of black and latino male youth in the era of mass incarceration. Souls: A Critical Journal of Black Politics, Culture, and Society8(2): 40–54.
51.
RodriguezN (2005) Restorative justice, communities and delinquency: Whom do we reintegrate?Criminology and Public Policy4(1): 103–130.
52.
RodriguezNSmithHZatzM (2009) ‘Youth is enmeshed in a highly dysfunctional family system’: Exploring the relationship among dysfunctional families, parental incarceration, and juvenile court decision making. Criminology47(1): 177–208.
53.
RoseN (1996) The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government. Economy and Society25(3): 327–356.
54.
SaezE (2013) Striking it richer: The evolution of top incomes in the United States. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for the Study of Poverty and Inequality. Available at: http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2012.pdf (accessed 29 March 2014).
55.
SimonJ (2007) Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear: Studies in Crime and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
SnyderGSickmundM (2006) Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
57.
ThornberryTKrohnM (2003) Taking Stock of Delinquency: An Overview of Findings from Contemporary Longitudinal Studies. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
58.
TonryM (2009) Explanations of American punishment policies. Punishment & Society11(3): 377–394.
