Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2014-4
The Indeterminacy of the Risk Factor Prevention Paradigm: A Case Study of Community Partnerships Implementing Youth and Gang Violence Prevention Policy
In addition to methodological criticisms of the Risk Factor Prevention Paradigm (RFPP), numerous scholars have revealed that youth justice that is based on it reinforces the criminalization and exclusion of the most vulnerable and poorest youth in society. This article provides insight into the interpretation of the RFPP in local youth and gang violence prevention policy and practice. It uncovers that the RFPP is differentially conceptualized and articulated, such that some risk factors may be erased, others may be reinterpreted, and yet others may be raised to positions of prominence. I conclude that the RFPP is malleable and, thus, indeterminate.
ArmstrongD (2004) A risky business? Research, policy, governmentality and youth offending. Youth Justice4(2): 100–116.
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2002) Best practices of youth violence prevention: A sourcebook for community action. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/chapter1-a.pdf.
3.
BraithwaiteJ (2006) The new regulatory state and the transformation of criminology. British Journal of Criminology40(2): 222–238.
4.
BrownE (2007) It’s urban living, not ethnicity itself: Race, crime and the urban geography of high-risk youth. Geography Compass1(2): 222–245.
5.
CaseS (2007) Questioning the ‘evidence’ of risk that underpins evidence-led youth justice interventions. Youth Justice7(2): 91–105.
6.
CatalanoRHawkinsJ (1996) The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In: HawkinsJ (ed.) Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 149–197.
7.
CherneyASuttonA (2007) Crime prevention in Australia: Beyond ‘what works?’Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology40(1): 65–81.
8.
CurrieE (1985) Confronting Crime: An American Challenge. New York: Pantheon Books.
9.
DouglasM (1992) Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.
10.
DouglasKKroppP (2002) A prevention-based paradigm for violence risk assessment: Clinical and research applications. Criminal Justice and Behavior29(5): 617–658.
11.
FarringtonD (1994) The influence of the family on delinquent development. In: HenricsonC (ed.) Crime and the Family. London: Family Policy Studies Center.
12.
FarringtonD (2000) Explaining and preventing crime: The globalization of knowledge. Criminology38(1): 1–24.
13.
FarringtonDWelshB (2007) Saving Children from a Life of Crime: Early Risk Factors and Effective Interventions. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
14.
FeeleyMSimonJ (1992) The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology30(4): 449–474.
15.
GarlandD (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
GarlandD (2002) The rise of risk. In: EricsonRDoyleA (eds) Risk and Morality. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 48–86.
17.
GoddardT (2012) Post-welfarist risk managers? Risk, crime prevention and the responsibilization of community-based organizations. Theoretical Criminology16(3): 347–363.
18.
GrayP (2009) The political economy of risk and the new governance of youth crime. Punishment & Society11(4): 443–458.
19.
HainesKCaseS (2008) The rhetoric and reality of the ‘risk factor prevention paradigm’ approach to preventing and reducing youth offending. Youth Justice8(1): 5–20.
20.
Hannah-MoffatK (2005) Criminogenic needs and the transformative risk subject: Hybridizations of risk/need in penality. Punishment & Society7(1): 29–51.
21.
HomelJ (2009) Pathways from school bullying to adult aggression: A longitudinal study. PhD thesis, The Australian National University. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/49361
22.
HughesG (1998) Understanding Crime Prevention: Social Control, Risk, and Late Modernity. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
23.
HughesGMcLaughlinEMuncieJ (2002) Crime Prevention and Community Safety: New Directions. London: Sage Publications.
24.
HughesN (2011) Young people ‘as risk’ or young people ‘at risk’: Comparing discourses of anti-social behaviour in England and Victoria. Critical Social Policy31(3): 388–409.
25.
KairysD (1998) Introduction. In: KairysD (ed.) The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, 3rd Edition.New York: Basic Books, 1–20.
26.
KellyL (2012) Representing and preventing youth crime and disorder: Intended and unintended consequences of targeted youth programmes in England. Youth Justice12(2): 101–117.
27.
KellyP (2001) Youth at risk: Process of individualisation and responsibilization in the risk society. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education22(1): 23–33.
28.
KemshallH (2003) Understanding risk in criminal justice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
29.
LynchM (1998) Waste managers? The new penology, crime fighting, and the parole agent identity. Law & Society Review32(4): 839–869.
30.
MaruttoPHannah-MoffatK (2006) Assembling risk and the restructuring of penal control. British Journal of Criminology46(3): 438–454.
31.
MerrySE (2001) Spatial governmentality and the new urban social order: Controlling gender violence through law. American Anthropologist103(1): 16–29.
32.
MuncieJ (2006) Governing young people: Coherence and contradiction in contemporary youth justice. Critical Social Policy26(4): 770–793.
33.
O’MahonyP (2009) The risk factors prevention paradigm and the causes of youth crime: A deceptively useful analysis?Youth Justice9(2): 99–114.
34.
O’MalleyP (2004) The uncertain promise of risk. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology37(3): 323–343.
35.
O’MalleyP (2010) Crime and Risk. London: Sage Publications.
36.
PittsJ (2003) The New Politics of Youth Crime: Discipline or Solidarity?New York: Palgrave.
37.
RieleK (2006) Youth ‘at risk’: Further marginalizing the marginalized?Journal of Education Policy21(2): 129–145.
38.
RutterMGillerHHagellA (1998) Antisocial Behavior by Young People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
SampsonRLaubJ (1993) Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
SilverEMillerL (2002) A cautionary note on the use of actuarial risk assessment tools for social control. Crime and Delinquency48(1): 138–161.
41.
SkoganW (1988) Community organizations and crime. In: TonryMMorrisN (eds) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 39–78.
42.
StensonK (1999) Crime control, governmentality, and sovereignty. In: SmandychR (ed.) Governable Places: Readings on Governmentality and Crime. London: Sage Publications, 45–73.
43.
StensonKWattP (1999) Governmentality and the death of the social? A discourse analysis of local government texts in the southeast of England. Urban Studies36(1): 189–201.
44.
StrathernM (2000) Introduction: New accountabilities. In: StrathernM (ed.) Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Audit, Ethics and the Academy. London: Routledge, 1–18.
