Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2013-12
Limited Disproportionate Minority Contact Discourse may Explain Limited Progress in Reducing Minority Over-representation in the US Juvenile Justice System
This article provides a review of the development of the US federal government disproportionate minority contact (DMC) mandate for the juvenile justice system. Research assessing the reduction of disproportionate minority contact and demonstrating an overall lack of progress is examined. The connection between the lack of progress in reducing disproportionate minority contact and the lack of focus on the front end of the system is established. The impact on the juvenile justice system and, more importantly, on minority youth are discussed and recommendations in terms of expanding the discourse, policy and practice to more fully include police are made. Finally, the US experience and limitations are put into a global perspective, underscoring commonality across nations in addressing race, ethnic and age discrimination among police.
BilchikS (1999) Minorities in the juvenile justice system. In: 1999 National Report Series Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Washington DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
2.
CahnES (2006) How the Juvenile Justice System Reduces Life Options of Minority Youth. Washington DC: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies Health Policy Institute.
3.
ChapmanJFDesaiRAFalzerPRBorumR (2006) Violence risk and race in a sample of youth in juvenile detention: The potential to reduce disproportionate minority confinement. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice4(2): 170–184.
4.
DillardDBernardFGallowayS.JamesAKhanR (2010) Reducing Disproportionate Minority Contact in Delaware’s Juvenile Justice System. Available at: http://cjc.delaware.gov.
5.
DirikxAGeldersDParmentierS (2012) Police–youth relationships: A qualitative analysis of Flemish adolescents’ attitudes toward police. European Journal of Criminology9(2): 191–205.
6.
FeldBC (1999) Bad Kids: Race and the Transformation of the Juvenile Court. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
HuizingaDElliotD (1987) Juvenile offenders: Prevalence, offender incidence, and arrest rates by race. Crime & Delinquency33: 206–223.
8.
KauttP (2011) Public confidence in the British police: Negotiating the signals from Anglo-American research. International Criminal Justice Review21(4): 353–382.
9.
KeenRT (2007) Disproportionate minority contact in Delaware. Available at: http://cjc.delaware.gov.
10.
Kempf-LeonardK (2007) Minority youths and juvenile justice: Disproportionate minority contact after nearly 20 years of reform efforts. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice5(1): 71–87.
11.
KrisbergBSchwartzIFishmanGEisikovitsZGuttmanEJoeK (1987) The incarceration of minority youth. Crime & Delinquency, 33: 173–205.
12.
LaMotteVOuelletteKSandersonJAndersonSKosuticIGriggsJGarciaM (2010) Effective police interactions with youth: A program evaluation. Police Quarterly13: 161–179.
13.
LeiberM (2002) Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) of youth: An analysis of state and federal efforts to address the issue. Crime & Delinquency48: 3–45.
14.
LeiberMRodriquezN (2011) The implementation of the Disproportionate Minority Confinement/Contact (DMC) mandate: A failure or success?Race and Justice1(1): 103–124.
15.
LeiberMStairsJ (1999) Race, contexts, and the use of intake diversion. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency36: 56–86.
16.
McAraLMcVieS (2005) The usual suspects? Street-life, young people and the police. Criminal Justice5(1): 5–36.
17.
MooradianJK (2012) Breaking the lock: Addressing ‘disproportionate minority confinement’ in the United States using a human rights approach. Journal of Social Work12: 37–50.
18.
NellisARichardsonB (2010) Getting beyond failure: Promising approaches for reducing DMC. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice8: 266–276.
19.
NovakKJFrankJSmithBWEngelRS (2002) Revisiting the decision to arrest: Comparing beat and community officers. Crime & Delinquency48: 70–98.
20.
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2009) Disproportionate Minority Contact (NCJ 228306). Washington DC: US Department of Justice.
21.
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2011) OJJDP: An overview (NCJ 234073). Washington DC: US Department of Justice.
22.
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2012) Disproportionate Minority Contact (NCJ 239457). Washington DC: US Department of Justice.
23.
PopeCFeyerhermW (1990) Minority status and juvenile justice processing: An assessment of the research literature (Part I). Criminal Justice Abstracts22: 327–385.
24.
PopeCLovellRHsiaH (2001) Synthesis of disproportionate minority confinement (DMC) literature (1989–1999). Washington DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention.
25.
PuzzancheraC (2009) Juvenile arrests 2008. Juvenile Justice Bulletin (NCJ 228479). Washington DC: US Department of Justice.
26.
PuzzancheraCAdamsB (2011) Juvenile arrests 2009. Juvenile Offenders and Victims: National Report Series Bulletin (NCJ 236477). Washington DC: US Department of Justice.
27.
RhodenE (1994) Disproportionate minority contact: First steps to a solution. Juvenile JusticeSpring/Summer: 9–14.
28.
RosenfeldRRojekJDeckerS (2012) Age matters: Race differences in police searches of young and older male drivers. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency49: 31–55.
29.
RubinHT (2011) Police and juvenile justice: Contracting the net. Juvenile Justice Update5(1): 1–4.
30.
SadlerJ (2008) Implementing the youth ‘anti-social behaviour’ agenda: Policing the Ashton Estate. Youth Justice8: 57–73.
31.
SellinT (1935) Race prejudice in the administration of justice. American Journal of Sociology41: 212–217.
32.
SolarMGarryLM (2009) Reducing Disproportionate Minority Contact: Preparation at the Local Level (NCJ 218861). Washington DC: US Department of Justice.
