In March 2000, the Department of Health and the Home Office issued guidance fundamentally altering policy and practice with regard to young people in prostitution.1Instead of being arrested and punished for prostitution-related offences, those under 18 years old were to be thought of as children ‘in need’ and offered welfare-based interventions. The practice that has developed in the last three years has offered interventions that are located within both child protection and youth justice work. This article examines these changes in order to generate insights about the changing nature of youth justice. In particular, it is argued that the drive to manage the risks posed by young people in prostitution to specific organisations, takes precedence over either the desire to care for, or the demand to punish them. Through an analysis of how practitioners and policy makers responsible for implementing this new approach to youth prostitution talk about ‘risk’ and ‘responsibility’, ‘liability’, ‘protection’ and ‘punishment’, the article argues that the contradiction between care and control has been re-interpreted, such that there is noticeable blurring of the boundaries between welfare and punishment at the margins of youth justice work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brown, S. (1996) Understanding Youth and Crime: Listening to Youth. Buckingham, The Open University Press .
2.
Carlen, P. (1996) Jigsaw: A Political Criminology of Youth Homelessness. Buckingham, The Open University Press .
3.
Crawford, A. and Newburn, T. (2003) Youth Offending and Restorative Justice: Implementing reform in youth justice. Collumpton, Willan Publishing .
4.
Goldson, B. (2002) Vulnerable Inside: Children in secure and penal settings. London, The Children’s Society .
5.
Goldson, B. and Jamieson, J (2002) Youth Crime, the ‘Parenting Deficit’ and State Intervention: A Contextual Critique , in Youth Justice Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 82-99 .
6.
Kempf-Leonard, K. and Petersen, E. (2000/2002) Expanding Realms of the New Penology: The Advent of Actuarial Justice for Juveniles in Muncie, J. , Hughes, G. and McLaughlin, E. (Eds.) (2002) Youth Justice: Critical Readings. London, The Open University in association with Sage .
7.
Melrose, M. , Barrett, D. and Brodie, I. (1996) One-Way Street? Retrospectives on Childhood Prostitution. London, The Children’s Society .
8.
Muncie, J. (1999) Youth and Crime: A Critical Introduction. London, Sage .
9.
Muncie, J. and Hughes, G. (2002) Modes of Youth Governance: Political rationalities, criminalisation and resistance in Muncie, J. , Hughes, G. and McLaughlin, E. (Eds.) Youth Justice: Critical Readings. London, Sage .
10.
O’Neill, M. (2000) Prostitution and Feminism. London, Polity .
11.
O’Neill, T. (2001) Children in Secure Accommodation: A Gendered Exploration of Locked Institutional Care for Children in Trouble. London, Jessica Kingsley .
12.
Pearce, J. (2003) It’s someone taking a part of you. York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation .
13.
Phoenix, J. (1999) Making Sense of Prostitution. London, Palgrave .
14.
Phoenix, J. (2002) In the Name of Protection: Youth Prostitution Policy Reforms in England and Wales , Critical Social Policy, 22(2): 353-375 .
15.
Pitts, J. (1988) The Politics of Juvenile Crime. London, Sage .
16.
Pitts, J. (2003) Youth Justice in England and Wales in Matthews, R. and Young, J. (Eds.) The New Politics of Crime and Punishment. Cullompton, Willan Publishing .
17.
Pratt, J. (1989/2002) Corporatism: the third model of juvenile justice in Muncie, J. , Hughes, G. and McLaughlin, E. (Eds.) (2002) Youth Justice: Critical Readings. London, The Open University in association with Sage .
18.
Smith, R. (2001) Foucault’s Law: The Crime and Disorder Act 1998 . Youth Justice, 1(2): 17-29 .
19.
Smith, R. (2003) Youth Justice: Ideas, Policy and Practice. Cullompton, Willan Publishing .
20.
Swann, S. and Balding, V. (2001) Safeguarding Children Involved in Prostitution: Guidance Review. Department of Health, HMSO .
