As a novel contribution to the application of economic concepts of property rights to resource management as a fundamental planning issue, this paper analyses the dichotomy (the Barzel thesis) between “economic property rights” and “legal property rights”. In lieu of Barzel’s dichotomous distinction, an alternative account of “de facto property rights” as a fraction of “de jure property rights” is presented. The paper uses three case studies on squatting to show the untenability of the Barzel thesis. It offers an application of the thesis as a distinction along two dimensions, namely de jure rights (as legitimate and commonly-accepted rules on access) to and de facto access/control of a resource or property.
…property rights are indispensable constraints for any decision involving more than one individual (Cheung 1978: 42).
AlchianArmen A. (1965) “Some economics of property rights”. Il Politico: 816-829.
2.
AlexanderErnest R. (2007) “Planning rights and their implications”. Planning Theory6(2): 112-126.
3.
AllenDouglas W. (1998) “Property rights, transaction costs, and Coase: one more time”. In MedemaS.G., Coasean Economics Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 105-118.
4.
AllenDouglas W. (2015) “On Hodgson on property rights”. Journal of Institutional Economics11(4): 711-717.
5.
AllenDouglas W. (2017) ''Property as sequential exchange: definition and language issues.” Journal of Institutional Economics13(4): 785-792.
6.
AllenDouglas W. (2022) “On the primacy of economic property rights”. Journal of Institutional Economics: 1-4.
BarzelYoram (1989) Economic Analysis of Property Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BarzelYoram (2015) “What are ‘property rights’, and why do they matter? A comment on Hodgson’s article”. Journal of Institutional Economics11: 719–723.
10.
BellAbrahamSpectorHoracio (2012) “Toward a theory of state own property rights”. Draft prepared for a session of the 16th annual conference of the International Society for New Institutional Economics (2012) in honour of Yoram Barzel.
11.
BerkeleyGeorge (1734) A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, London: Tonson.
12.
BishopJohn Douglas (2023) “Property Rights”. In Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics, pp. 1506-1512. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
13.
BuitelaarEdwinNeedhamBarrie (2007) “Epilogue: Property rights between tools and social values”. Town Planning Review78(1): 119-122.
14.
ChengGuangyuChenYang (2023) “Effects of Incomplete Property Rights on Informal Housing Prices: Evidence from Small Property Rights Housing of China”. Journal of Urban Planning and Development149(4): 05023029.
15.
CheungSteven N.S.The myth of social cost. IEA, London1978.
16.
CheungSteven N.S. (1987) “Common property rights”. In: EatwellJ.MilgateM.NewmanP., eds., The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, Vol. I (Macmillan, London), 504-506.
17.
ChuaMark HansleyYauYung (2022) “Early experience of Land readjustment in Hong Kong: Case study of the Kowloon Walled City”. Buildings12(6): 757.
18.
CoaseRonald Harry (1974) “The lighthouse in economics”. Journal of Law & Economics, 17: 357–376.
19.
ColeDaniel H. (2015) “‘Economic property rights’ as ‘nonsense upon stilts’: a comment on Hodgson”. Journal of Institutional Economics11(4): 725-730.
20.
ColeDaniel H.GrossmanPeter Z. (2002), “The meaning of property rights: law versus economics?” Land Economics, 78(3): 317–330.
21.
CozzolinoStefanoMoroniStefano (2021) “Multiple agents and self-organisation in complex cities: The crucial role of several property”. Land Use Policy103: 105297.
22.
CozzolinoStefanoMoroniStefano (2022) “Structural preconditions for adaptive urban areas: Framework rules, several property and the range of possible actions”. Cities130: 103978.
23.
EllicksonRobert C. (1993) “Property in land”. Yale Law Journal102: 1315.
24.
Frech IIIH. Edward (1979) “The extended Coase Theorem and long run equilibrium: the nonequivalence of liability rules and property rights”. Economic Inquiry17(2): 254-268.
25.
GattisDavid (2013) “Planning and development regulations.” A Guide to Urban Planning in Texas Communities. Texas Chapter, American Planning Association.
26.
GrattanC. Hartley (1933) “The Australian political seesaw”. Current History37(4): 433–437.
27.
HarrisonJackieTorsonerSara (2022) “Safety of journalists and media freedom: trends in non-EU countries from a human rights perspective”. European Parliament’s Subcommittee on Human Rights, European Union.
28.
HeShenjingShanLuJinZhu (2024) “How planning intervention changes the “price tags” of property rights? Towards a dynamic understanding of China’s small property right housing”. Cities150: 105091.
29.
HodgsonGeoffrey M. (2015) “Much of the ‘economics of property rights’ devalues property and legal rights”. Journal of Institutional Economics11(4): 683-709.
30.
HohfeldW.N.Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 1946.
31.
LaiLawrence W.C. (1997) “Property rights justifications for planning and a theory of zoning”. Progress in Planning3(48): 161–245.
32.
LaiLawrence W.C. (2023) “From fish to land grabbing: a note on the transition of the concept of “common property” in property rights research under two traditions”. Planning Theory22(3): 338-348.
LaiLawrence W.C.DaviesStephen N.G. (2022) “Is non-zoning of land impossible? Eight fundamental propositions of zoning”. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2098096.
35.
LaiLawrence W.C.ChauK.W.LorneFrank T. (2015) “‘Unclear’ initial delineation of property boundaries and the third Coase Theorem”. Land Use Policy47: 273-281.
36.
LaiLawrence W.C.HungConnie W.Y. (2008) “The inner logic of the Coase Theorem and a Coasian planning research agenda”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design35(2): 207-226.
37.
LaiLawrence W.C.HoDaniel C.W.LeungH.F. (2017) Change in Use of Land: A Practical Guide to Development in Hong Kong, 3rd ed.Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
38.
LaiLawrence W.C.DaviesStephen N.G.LorneF.T. (2016) “Creation of property rights in planning by contract and edict: Beyond “Coasian bargaining” in private planning”. Planning Theory15(4): 418-434.
39.
LaiLawrence W.C.DaviesStephen N.G .ChoyLennon H.T., et al. (2022) “Land planning, property rights and management of built heritage: Some Hong Kong observations of colonial military buildings”. Land11(9): 1516.
40.
LaiLawrenceW.C.StephenDaviesN.G.Prudence LeungKL, et al. (2023) ‘Ring up for an appointment’: Empirical & oral evidence of commercial & other freedoms in the heyday of the City. Cities135: 104232.
41.
LaiLawrence W.C.WongS.K.HoEric C.K., et al. (2008) “Time is of the essence? An empirical application of the corollary of the Coase Theorem”. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies20(1): 34-51.
42.
LiDavid D. (1996) “A theory of ambiguous property rights in transition economies: the case of the Chinese non-state sector.” Journal of Comparative Economics, 23, no. 1 (1996): 1–19.
43.
McCayBonnie J. (1978) “Systems ecology, people ecology, and the anthropology of fishing communities”. Human Ecology6: 397-422.
44.
MoroniStefano (2018) “Property as a human right and property as a special title: Rediscussing private ownership of land”. Land Use Policy, 70: 273-280.
45.
MoroniStefano (2019) “Constitutional and post-constitutional problems: Reconsidering the issues of public interest, agonistic pluralism and private property in planning”. Planning Theory18(1): 5-23.
46.
MoroniStefano (2024) “Untangling the commons: three different forms of commonality”. Review of Austrian Economics: 1-17.
47.
OstromElinor (1992) “Institutions and common-pool resources”. Journal of Theoretical Politics4(3): 243-245.
48.
OstromElinor (2000) “Private and common property rights”. In: Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 332–379.
49.
PalermoPier CarloPonziniDavide (2010) Spatial Planning and Urban Development: Critical Perspectives. Vol. 10. Springer Science & Business Media.
50.
PanmanAlexandra (2021) “How effective are informal property rights in cities? Reexamining the relationship between informality and housing quality in Dar es Salaam”. Oxford Development Studies49(3): 230-244.
51.
PruijtHans (2013) “The logic of urban squatting”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37(1):19-45.
52.
RawskiEvelyn Sakakida (2013) Agricultural Change and the Peasant Economy of South China, Harvard University Press.
53.
SaHaoxuan (2020) “Do ambiguous property rights matter? Collective value logic in Lin Village”. Land Use Policy99: 105066.
54.
SamuelsonPaul A. (1964) Economics: An Introductory Analysis, New York, McGraw Hill.
55.
SeamanJohn W. (1990) “Hobbes on public charity & the prevention of idleness: A liberal case for welfare”. Polity23(1): 105-126.
56.
SlaevAleksandar D. (2017) “The relationship between planning and the market from the perspective of property rights theory: A transaction cost analysis”. Planning Theory16(4): 404-424.
57.
SlaevAleksandar D. (2022) “Matching the degree of privateness/collectiveness to the scale of resource use”. Land Use Policy112: 105809.
58.
SlaevAleksandar D.DaskalovaDiliana (2020) “Complex property rights and Coasean bargaining in natural resource management”. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning22(4): 486-500.
59.
Sloan JamesKevinChand. (2016) An analysis of property rights in the Fijian qoliqoli. Marine policy72: 76–81.
60.
StiglerGeorge J. (1987) The Theory of Price. 4th ed.. New York: Macmillan.
61.
StuartIain (2007) “The surveyors’ lot: making landscapes in New South Wales”. Australasian Historical Archaeology25: 43-55.
62.
StuartIain (2019) “Macquarie and the towns”. Journal of the Royal Australian Historical Society105(1): 26-48.
63.
ThorntonJudith (1995) “Economic reform and economic reality”. John Marshall Law Review28: 847.
64.
VeblenThornstein (1908) “Fisher’s capital and income”. Political Science Quarterly23(1): 112-128.
65.
WatsonJames L. (1977) “Hereditary tenancy and corporate landlordism in traditional China: a case study”. Modern Asian Studies11(20): 161–182.
66.
WoodStepan (2023) “When should publicly owned land be considered private in homeless encampment cases? A critique of recent developments in BC”. Journal of Law & Social Policy36: 64.
67.
ZhuJieming (2002) “Urban development under ambiguous property rights: A case of China’s transition economy”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26(1): 41-57.
