Rise of Flexibility and Complexity Research in Planning Literature: With What Consequences,for Whom,and Why?

Albrechts L Barbanente A Monno V (2019) From stage-managed planning towards a more imaginative and inclusive strategic spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37(8): 1489–1506.

Amin A Thrift N (2002) Reimagining the urban. Cambridge: Policy Press.

Bibby P Henneberry J Halleux JM (2020) Under the radar? ‘Soft’ residential densification in England, 2001–2011. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47(1): 102–118.

Bishop P Williams L (2012) The Temporary City. London: Routledge.

Blumner N (2006) Planning for the unplanned: Tools and techniques for interim use in Germany and the United States. In Occasional papers (pp. 1–31).

Bosetti N Colthorpe T (2018) Meanwhile, in London: Making use of London’s empty spaces. Available at: https://centreforlondon.org/publication/meanwhile-use-london/ (accessed 14 August 2023).

Broitman D Koomen E (2015) Residential density change: Densification and urban expansion. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 54: 32–46.

Buitelaar E (2016) The fraught relationship between planning and regulation: Land-use plans and the conflicts in dealing with uncertainty. In: Hartmann T Needham B (eds) Planning by Law and Property Rights Reconsidered. London and New York: Routledge, pp.207–218.

Castells M (1983) The city and the grassroots. A cross-cultural theory of urban social movements. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Colomb C (2012) Pushing the urban frontier: Temporary uses of space, city marketing, and the creative city discourse in 2000s. Journal of Urban Affairs 34: 131–152.

Cozzolino S (2017) The City as Action: The Dialectic between Rules and Spontaneity. PhD Dissertation, Politecnico di Milano, Italy.

Debrunner G Gerber J-D (2021) The commodification of temporary housing. Cities, 108, 102998.

Debrunner G Bossuyt D (2024) Towards flexible planning in the Swiss-Dutch urban densification context – Just, or just compact? In Preperation.

Dembski S Dunning S Hengstermann A , et al. (2020) Introduction: Enhancing the understanding of strategies of land policy for urban densification. Town Planning Review 91(3): 209–216.

Florida R (2002) The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.

Folke C Carpenter SR Walker B , et al. (2010) Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability, Ecology and Society 15(4): 20–31.

Galdini R (2019) Urban re-use practices in contemporary cities: Experiences in Europe. Cities 87: 103–105.

Götze V Jehling M (2022) Comparing types and patterns: A context-oriented approach to densification in Switzerland and the Netherlands. Urban Analytics and City Science 0(0): 1–15.

Hartmann T Dembski S Hengstermann A , et al. (2022) Land for densification: how land policy and property matter. The Town Planning Review.

Hedblom M Andersson E Borgström S (2017) Flexible land-use and undefined governance: From threats to potentials in peri-urban landscape planning, Land Use Policy, 63, 523-727.

Holman N Mace A Paccoud A , et al. (2015) Coordinating density; working through conviction, suspicion & pragmatism. Progress in Planning 101: 1–38.

Honeck T (2017) From squatters to creatives. An innovation perspective on temporary use in planning. Planning Theory & Practice 18(2): 268–287.

Holm A Kuhn A (2010) Squatting and urban renewal: The interaction of squatter movements and strategies of urban restructuring in Berlin. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.

Keil R (2020) The density dilemma: there is always too much and too little of it. Urban Geography 41(10): 1284–1293.

McFarlane C (2016) The geographies of urban density: Topology, politics and the city. Progress in Human Geography 40(5): 629–648.

Moroni S Rauws W Cozzolino S (2019) Forms of self-organization: Urban complexity and planning implications, Environment and Planning B 47(2): 220–234.

Moroni S Buitelaar E Sorel N , et al. (2018) Simple Planning Rules for Complex Urban Poblems: Toward Legal Certainty for Spatial Flexibility Journal of Planning Education and Research 40(3): 320–331.

Oswalt P Overmeyer K Misselwitz P (2003) Urban Catalst. In Mit Zwischennutzungen Stadt entwickeln. Berlin: DOM Publishers.

Savini F Majoor S Salet W (2014) Dilemmas of planning: Intervention, regulation, and investment, Planning Theory 14(3): 296–315.

Savini F (2017) Planning, uncertainty and risk: The neoliberal logics of Amsterdam urbanism. Environment and Planning A 49(4): 857–875.

Sengupta U Rauws W de Roo G (2016) Planning and complexity: Engaging with temporal dynamics, uncertainty and complex adaptive systems. Environment and Planning B 43(6): 970–974.

UNDESA [United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs] . (2019) World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights. ST/ESA/SER.A/423.

UN General Assembly (2015) Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Report A/RES/70/1.

UN Habitat . (2022) Envisaging the Future of Cities. World Cities Report.

Vallance S Dupuis A Edwards S (2017) Temporary use and the onto-politics of ‘public’ space. Cities 70: 83–90.

Van den Hoek D Spit T Hartmann T (2020) Certain flexibilities in land-use plans. Towards a method for assessing flexibility. Land Use Policy 94: 104497.

Van Driessche R Ache P Lagendijk A (2023) How to plan for Discontinouity? Equipping ‘Anticipatory Assemblages’ with ‘Archives of the Future’, Planning Theory, 0((0), 1-22.

Van Wezemael J (2010) Urban governance and social complexity. In: Roo GD Silva E (eds) A Planner’s Encounter with Complexity. Farnham: Ashgate, pp.283–307.

Wicki M Hofer K Kaufmann D (2022) Planning instruments enhance the acceptance of urban densification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119(38): e2201780119.