BeauregardB (2016) Planning Matter: Acting with Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
BohmanJ (1996) Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
BoltanskiLThevenotL (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4.
BridgeG (2005) Reason in the City of Difference: Pragmatism, Communicative Action and Contemporary Urbanism.London: Routledge.
5.
DeweyJ (1981) In: BoydsonJ-A (ed) The Later Works 1925-1953, Vol 1, 1925 Experience and Nature. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
6.
DeweyJ (1984) In: BoydsonJ-A (ed) The Later Works 1925-1953, Vol 2, 1925-1927 Essays, Reviews Miscellany and the Public and its Problems. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
7.
DeweyJ (1986) In: BoydsonJ-A (ed) The Later Works 1925-1953, Vol 12, 1938 Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
8.
DeweyJ (2008) In: BoydsonJ-A (ed) The Later Works 1925-1953, Vol 10, 1934 Art as Experience. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
9.
FungA (2007) Democratic theory and political science: A pragmatic method of constructive engagement. American Political Science Review101(3): 443–458.
10.
HealeyP (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies.London: Macmillan.
11.
HealeyP (2009) The pragmatic tradition in planning thought. Journal of Planning Education and Research28(3): 277–292.
12.
HochC (1984a) Doing good and being right: the pragmatic connection in planning theory. Journal of the American Planning Association50: 335–345.
13.
HochC (1984b) Pragmatism, planning and power. Journal of Planning Education and Research4: 86–95.
14.
ForesterJ (2000) The Deliberative Practitioner.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
LatourB (2004) How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body & Society10(2–3): 205–229.