In some marginal contexts of Southern Italy, in light of specific economic, political and social conditions, certain relationships between ‘strong powers’ and ‘weak powers’ produce a suspension of norms/rights that is, paradoxically, ‘normalised’. This creates a particular spatial variation of Agamben’s (2005) state of exception concept: the ‘landscape of exception’. With respect to the possible conditions of ‘exception’, this article describes the ‘landscape of exception’ of the greenhouse system in South-Eastern Sicily. This ‘landscape of exception’ is generated by the greenhouses, in particular those dedicated to vegetable production, through an effective mechanism of spatial manipulation of the landscape and social control of migrant workers. In relation to these considerations, this work reflects on the ethical challenges and responsibilities of planning, highlighting (explicit and latent) conflicts and power inequalities in the ‘landscapes of exception’, where issues of environmental sustainability, social justice and the suspension of norms are closely intertwined.
AgambenG (2005). State of Exception. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AgambenG (2014) What is a destituent power?Environment and Planning D: Society and Space32: 65–74.
3.
AllmendingerP (2001) Planning in Postmodern Times. London: Routledge.
4.
ArmitageJ (2002) State of emergency. Theory, Culture and Society19(4): 27–38.
5.
BaptistaI (2013) Practices of exception in urban governance: Reconfiguring power inside the state. Urban Studies50(1): 39–54.
6.
BerlanJP (2002) La longue histoire du modèle californien. Forum Civique Européen, Le goût amer de nos fruits et légumes. L’exploitation des migrants dans l’agriculture intensive en Europe. Informations et Commentaires, pp.15–22.
7.
BoanoCMartenR (2013) Agamben’s urbanism of exception: Jerusalem’s border mechanics and biopolitical strongholds. Cities34: 6–17.
CertomàC (2015) Expanding the ‘dark side of planning’: Governmentality and biopolitics in urban garden planning. Planning Theory14(1): 23–43.
11.
ColeJEBoothSS (2007) Dirty Work: Immigrants in Domestic Service, Agriculture, and Prostitution in Sicily. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
12.
Consorzio Regionale per la Ricerca Applicata in Agricoltura (Coreras) (2017) Report sulle filiere agroalimentari siciliane. Palermo: Antipodes.
13.
CorradoAde CastroCPerrottaP (eds.) (2016) Migrations and Agriculture. Mobility and Change in the Mediterranean Areas. London: Routledge.
14.
De BenoistA (2007) Global terrorism and the state of permanent exception. In: OdysseosLPetitoF (eds.) The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt: Terror, Liberal War and the Crisis of Global Order. London: Routledge, p.73.
15.
De ZuluetaT (2003) Migrants in irregular employment in the agricultural sector of southern European countries. Report for the Debate in the Standing Committee, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
16.
DikenBLaustsenCB (2005) The Culture of Exception: Sociology Facing the Camp. London: Routledge.
17.
EgozSMakhzoumiJPungettiG (2011) The Right to Landscape. Contesting Landscape and Human Rights. London: Routledge.
18.
EkR (2006) Giorgio Agamben and the spatialities of the camp. Geografiska Annaler B88(4): 363–386.
19.
FaríasIFloresP (2015) A different state of exception: Governing urban reconstruction in post-27F Chile. Urban Studies54(5): 1108–1125.
20.
FawazM (2016) Exceptions and the actually existing practice of planning: Beirut (Lebanon) as case study. Urban Studies54(8): 1938–1955.
21.
FlyvbjergB (1998) Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
FlyvbjergB (2003) Rationality and power. In: CambellSFainsteinSS (eds.) Readings in Planning Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp.318–329.
23.
FriedmannJ (1992) Empowerment: The Politics of Alternative Development. London: Basil Blackwell.
24.
GrayNPorterL (2014). By Any means necessary: Urban regeneration and the “state of exception” in Glasgow’s Commonwealth Games 2014. Antipode47(2): 380–400.
25.
GregoryD (2006) The black flag: Guantánamo Bay and the space of exception. Geografiska Annaler B88(4): 405–427.
26.
GunderMMouatC (2002) Symbolic violence and victimization in planning processes: A reconnoitre of the New Zealand Resource Management Act. Planning Theory1(2): 124–145.
27.
HandelA (2007) Controlling space with space: Uncertainty as controlling technology. Theory and Criticism31: 101–126.
28.
HardtMNegriA (2005) Multitude. London: Penguin.
29.
HarveyD (1992) Social justice, postmodernism and the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research16(4): 588–601.
30.
HarveyDPotterC (2009) The right to the just city. In: MarcusePConnollyJNovyJOlivoIPotterCSteilJ (eds.) Searching for the Just City: Debate in Urban Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge, pp.40–51.
31.
HillierJ (2002) Shadows of Power. An Allegory of Prudence in Land-Use Planning. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
HochC (1984) Pragmatism, planning, and power. Journal of Planning Education and Research4(2): 86–95.
33.
INEA (2013) Indagine sull’impiego degli immigrati in agricoltura in Italia 2011. Roma: INEA.
34.
ISTAT (2010) 6th Census for Agriculture in 2010. Rome: ISTAT.
35.
ISTAT (2016) Le statistiche sull’agricoltura siciliana: Informazioni per l’analisi delle politiche. Censimento dell’agricoltura 2010, vol. 2. Palermo: Leima.
36.
JabareenY (2017) The right to space production and the right to necessity: Insurgent versus legal rights of Palestinians in Jerusalem. Planning Theory16(1): 6–31.
37.
KameteAY (2018) Of good plants and useless weeds: Planning as a spatial technology of the gardening state. Planning Theory17(2): 253–273.
38.
KasimisC (2010) Demographic trends in rural Europe and international migration to rural areas. Agriregionieuropa21: 71 –74.
39.
KatzI (2016) Camp evolution and Israel’s creation: Between ‘state of emergency’ and ‘emergence of state’. Political Geography55: 144–155.
40.
LefebvreH (1970) Il diritto alla città. Padova: Marsilio.
41.
Lo PiccoloF (2016) Landing through informal blue infrastructures: The state of exception in planning. In: MocciaFDSepeM (eds.) Reti e infrastrutture dei territori contemporanei. Networks and infrastructures of contemporary territories. Roma: INU Edizioni, pp.41–51.
42.
Lo PiccoloFHalawaniAR (2014) The concept of exception: From politics to spatial domain. Planum2(29): 1–11.
43.
Lo PiccoloFSchilleciFTodaroV (2019) Multilevel power relations and planning conflicts in a ‘land of exception’: The case of the Sughereta di Niscemi reserve in Sicily. In: EraydinAFreyK (eds.) Politics and Conflict in Governance and Planning. Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.59–74.
44.
Marrero-GuillamónI (2012) Olympic state of exception. In: PowellHMarrero-GuillamónI (eds.) The Art of Dissent: Adventures in London’s Olympic State. London: Marshgate Press, pp.20–29.
45.
Medici per i Diritti Umani (MEDU) (2015) Terraingiusta. Rapporto sulle condizioni di vita e di lavoro dei braccianti stranieri in agricoltura. Roma: MEDU.
46.
MenattiL (2017) Landscape: From common good to human right. International Journal of the Commons11(2): 641–683.
47.
Mignella CalvosaF (2013) Premessa. In: CollocaCCorradoA (eds.) La globalizzazione delle campagne. Migranti e società rurali nel Sud Italia. Milano: FrancoAngeli, pp.9–12.
48.
MilnerEYacobiH (2017) Spaces of sovereignty: A tale of an unrecognized Palestinian village in Israel. Planning Theory17: 117–133.
49.
OphirAAzoulayA (2008) This Regime Which Is Not One: Occupation and Democracy Between the Sea and the River. Tel Aviv: Resling.
50.
PalumboLSciurbaA (2015) The case of Romanian women in the agricultural sector in Sicily. Anti-Trafficking Review5: 89–110.
51.
RoyA (2005) Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association71(2): 147–158.
52.
SaltiniA (1982) Sicilia fra feudi e giardini. Bologna: Edagricole.
53.
SánchezFBroudehouxAM (2013) Mega-events and urban regeneration in Rio de Janeiro: Planning in a state of emergency. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development5(2): 132–155.
54.
SandercockL (1998) Making the Invisible Visible: A Multicultural Planning History. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
55.
SassenS (2003) The feminization of survival: Alternative global circuits. In: MorokvasicMErelUShinozakiK (eds.) Crossing Borders and Shifting Boundaries. Gender on the Move, vol. 1. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp.59–77.
56.
SchinkelWvan den BergM (2011) City of exception: The Dutch Revanchist city and the urban homo sacer. Antipode43(5); 1911–1938.
57.
SchmittC (1985) Political Theology. Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58.
ShinHB (2012) Unequal cities of spectacle and mega-events in China. City16(6): 728–744.
59.
SwaffieldS (ed.) (2002) Theory in Landscape Architecture. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
60.
TodaroV (2016) Transizioni post-metropolitane ai margini: la Sicilia dei migranti, oltre l’invisibile. Territorio76: 72–77.
61.
TodaroV (2017) Mutamenti spaziali come effetto di mutazioni sociali? Questioni aperte sui flussi migratori nei territori dell’agricoltura di qualità in Sicilia. Contesti1–2: 72–87.
62.
YiftachelO (1994) The dark side of modernism: Planning as control of ethnic minority. In: WatsonSGibsonK (eds.) Postmodern City and Spaces. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp.261–242.
63.
YiftachelO (1998) Planning and social control: Exploring the dark side. Journal of Planning Literature12(4): 395–406.
