This article proposes a critical reflection on the concept of social innovation, arguing that it can be understood as a ‘magic concept’ as theorized by Pollitt and Hupe. It is a pervasive and positive notion in academia, policies and politics. The notion of social innovation is therefore deconstructed into the characteristics that make it so seductive: the multiplicity of meanings it can take on, its positive normative charge, its ability to generate consensus and its global marketability. This investigation underlines the way in which the understanding of social innovation may have profound repercussions in the ways in which decision-makers are reshaping urban governance.
BartelsK (2017) The double bind of social innovation: Relational dynamics of change and resistance in neighbourhood governance. Urban Studies54(16): 3789–3805.
8.
BecherTTrowlerP (2001) Academic Tribes and Territories. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.
9.
BifulcoLDodaroM (2018) Local welfare governance and social innovation: The ambivalence of the political dimension. In: EraydinAFreyK (eds) Politics and Conflict in Governance and Planning. London; New York: Routledge, 169–185.
10.
BonifacioM (2014) Social innovation: A novel policy stream or a policy compromise? An EU perspective. European Review22(1): 145–169.
11.
BoonstraBBoelensL (2011) Self-organization in urban development: Towards a new perspective on spatial planning. Urban Research & Practice4(2): 99–122.
12.
BovairdTLoefflerE (2012) From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations23(4): 1119–1138.
13.
BrandsenTEversACattacinS, et al. (2016) Social innovation: A sympathetic and critical interpretation. In BradsenTEversACattacinS, et al. (eds) Social Innovations in the Urban Context. Cham: Springer, 3–18.
14.
BrennerNTheodoreN (2002) Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’. Antipode34(3): 349–379.
15.
BrokkingPGarcíaMVaiouD, et al. (2017) Housing and neighbourhood: Basic needs, governance and social innovation In: MartinelliFAnttonenAMätzkeM (eds) Social Services Disrupted: Changes, Challenges and Policy Implications for Europe in Times of Austerity. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 342–362.
16.
Cajaiba-SantanaG (2014) Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change82: 42–51.
Caulier-GriceJDaviesAPatrickR, et al. (2012) Defining social innovation. A deliverable of the project: ‘The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe’ (TEPSIE). European Commission–7th Framework Programme, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research, 22.
19.
ChristmannGB (2020a) Introduction: Struggling with innovations. Social innovations and conflicts in urban development and planning. European Planning Studies28: 423–433.
20.
ChristmannGBIbertOJessenJ, et al. (2020b) Innovations in spatial planning as a social process – Phases, actors, conflicts. European Planning Studies28: 496–520.
21.
CosgroveCH (ed.) (2004) The Meanings We Choose: Hermeneutical Ethics, Indeterminacy and the Conflict of Interpretations, vol. 5. London: Bloomsbury.
22.
EagletonT (2003) After Theory. New York: Basic Books.
23.
Edwards-SchachterMWallaceML (2017) ‘Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change119: 64–79.
24.
EizaguirreSPradelMTerronesA, et al. (2012) Multilevel governance and social cohesion: Bringing back conflict in citizenship practices. Urban Studies49(9): 1999–2016.
EversAEwertB (2013) How to approach social innovation: Lessons from Berlin. In: 1st international conference on public policy, Grenoble, 26–28 June.
27.
FossatiECDegavreFNyssensM (2017) How to deal with an ‘essentially contested concept’ on the field? Sampling social innovations through the Delphi method. European Public & Social Innovation Review2(1): 45–58.
28.
FougèreMSegercrantzBSeeckH (2017) A critical reading of the European Union’s social innovation policy discourse: (Re)legitimizing neoliberalism. Organization24(6): 819–843.
29.
GarcíaMEizaguirreSPradelM (2015) Social innovation and creativity in cities: A socially inclusive governance approach in two peripheral spaces of Barcelona. City, Culture and Society6(4): 93–100.
30.
GeromettaJHaussermannHLongoG (2005) Social innovation and civil society in urban governance: Strategies for an inclusive city. Urban Studies42(11): 2007–2021.
GodinB (2015) Innovation Contested: The Idea of Innovation Over the Centuries. London: Routledge.
33.
GonzálezSHealeyP (2005) A sociological institutionalist approach to the study of innovation in governance capacity. Urban Studies42(11): 2055–2069.
34.
GothamKF (2003) Toward an understanding of the spatiality of urban poverty: The urban poor as spatial actors. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research27(3): 723–737.
35.
GrimmRFoxCBainesS, et al. (2013) Social innovation, an answer to contemporary societal challenges? Locating the concept in theory and practice. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research26(4): 436–455.
36.
HarrissonD (2012) Social innovation: What is coming apart and what is being rebuilt? In: FranzHWHochgernerJHowaldtJ (eds) Challenge Social Innovation: Potentials for Business, Social Entrepreneurship, Welfare and Civil Society. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 73–86.
37.
HaxeltineAAvelinoFWittmayerJ, et al. (2013) Transformative social innovations: A sustainability transitions perspective on social innovation. In: International conference social Frontiers: The next edge of social innovation research, London, 14–15 November.
38.
HillierJHealeyP (2008) Contemporary Movements in Planning Theory: Critical Essays in Planning Theory, vol. 3. Aldershot: Ashgate.
39.
HillierJMoulaertFNussbaumerJ (2004) Trois essais sur le rôle de l’innovation sociale dans le développement territorial. Géographie, Économie, Société6(2): 129–152.
HowaldtJSchwarzM (2010) Social Innovation: Concepts, Research Fields and International Trends. Dortmund: Sozialforschungsstelle Dortmund.
42.
HowaldtJKoppRSchwarzM (2015) Social innovations as drivers of social change – Exploring Tarde’s contribution to social innovation theory building. In: NichollsASimonJGabrielM, et al. (eds) New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 29–51.
JessopBMoulaertFHulgardL, et al. (2013) Social innovation research: A new stage in innovation analysis. In: MoulaertF (ed.) The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 110–130.
45.
KisbyB (2010) The Big Society: Power to the people?The Political Quarterly81(4): 484–491.
46.
LarssonOSBrandsenT (2016) The implicit normative assumptions of social innovation research: Embracing the dark side. In: BradsenTEversACattacinS, et al (eds) Social Innovations in the Urban Context. Cham: Springer, 293–302.
47.
MacCallumDMoulaertFHillierJ, et al. (eds) (2009) Social Innovation and Territorial Development. Farnham: Ashgate.
48.
MarcusePConnollyJNovyJ, et al. (eds) (2009) Searching for the Just City: Debates in Urban Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
49.
MartinelliF (2012) Social innovation or social exclusion? Innovating social services in the context of a retrenching welfare state. In: FranzHWHochgernerJHowaldtJ (eds) Challenge Social Innovation: Potentials for Business, Social Entrepreneurship, Welfare and Civil Society. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 169–180.
50.
MazzaL (2015) Planning and Citizenship. London; New York: Routledge.
51.
MeeuwisseA (2008) Organizational innovation in the Swedish welfare state. Critical Social Policy28(2): 187–210.
52.
MehmoodA (2016) Institutional forms of social innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development10(3): 300–311.
53.
MehmoodAParraC (2013) Social innovation in an unsustainable world. In: MoulaertFMacCallumDMehmoodA, et al. (eds) The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Chaltelham: Edward Elgar, 53–66.
54.
MontgomeryT (2016) Are social innovation paradigms incommensurable?VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations27(4): 1979–2000.
55.
MoroniS (2017) The public interest. In: GunderMMadanipourAWatsonV (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. London: Routledge, 69–80.
56.
MoulaertFAllerAACookeP, et al. (1990) Integrated Area Development and Efficacy of Local Action. Feasibility Study for the European Commission. Brussels: European Commission, DG Social Policy.
57.
MoulaertF (2000) Globalization and Integrated Area Development in European Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58.
MoulaertF (2009) Social innovation: Institutionally embedded, territorially (re)produced. In: MacCallumDMoulaertFHillierJ, et al. (eds) Social Innovation and Territorial Development. Farnham: Ashgate, 11–23.
59.
MoulaertFMacCallumD (2019) Advanced Introduction to Social Innovation. Chaltelham: Edward Elgar.
60.
MoulaertFMehmoodA (2020) Towards a social innovation (SI) based epistemology in local development analysis: Lessons from twenty years of EU research. European Planning Studies28: 434–453.
61.
MoulaertFNussbaumerJ (2005) Defining the social economy and its governance at the neighbourhood level: A methodological reflection. Urban Studies42(11): 2071–2088.
62.
MoulaertFMacCallumDMehmoodA, et al. (2013) The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
63.
MoulaertFMacCallumDVan Der BroeckP, et al. (2019) Bottom-linked governance and socially innovative political transformation. In: HowaldtJKaletkaCSchröderA, et al. (eds) Atlas of Social Innovation: A World of New Practices, vol. 2. München: Oekom Verlag, 63–66.
64.
MoulaertFMartinelliFSwyngedouwE, et al. (2005) Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies42(11): 1969–1990.
MoulaertFSwyngedouwEMartinelliF, et al. (2010) Can Neighbourhoods Save the City? Community Development and Social Innovation. London; New York: Routledge.
67.
MulganG (2006) The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization1(2): 145–162.
68.
MurrayRCaulier-GriceJMulganG (2010) The Open Book of Social Innovation. London: National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Art.
69.
NovyAHammerELeuboltB (2009) Social innovation and governance of scale in Austria. In: MacCallumDVicari HaddockSMoulaertF (eds) Social Innovation and Territorial Development. London; New York: Routledge, 131–148.
70.
NysethTHamdouchA (2019) The transformative power of social innovation in urban planning and local development. Urban Planning4(1): 1–6.
71.
OstromE (1996) Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development24(6): 1073–1087.
72.
ParésMOspinaSMSubiratsJ (eds) (2017) Social Innovation and Democratic Leadership: Communities and Social Change from Below. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
73.
PelkaBTerstripJ (2016) Mapping the social innovation maps – The state of research practice across Europe. European Public & Social Innovation Review1(1): 3–16.
74.
PestoffVBrandsenT (eds) (2013) Co-Production: The Third Sector and the Delivery of Public Services. London: Routledge.
75.
PhillsJADeiglmeierKMillerDT (2008) Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review6(4): 34–43.
76.
PolEVilleS (2009) Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term?The Journal of Socio-Economics38(6): 878–885.
77.
PollittCHupeP (2011) Talking about government: The role of magic concepts. Public Management Review13(5): 641–658.
78.
PradelMGarciaMEizaguirreS (2013) Theorizing multi-level governance in social innovation dynamics. In: MoulaertFMacCallumDMehmoodA, et al. (eds) The International Handbook of Social Innovation. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar, 155–168.
79.
RabadjievaMButzinA (2020) Emergence and diffusion of social innovation through practice fields. European Planning Studies28(5): 925–40.
SabatoSVanherckeBVerschraegenG (2017) Connecting entrepreneurship with policy experimentation? The EU framework for social innovation. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research30(2): 147–167.
84.
SchubertC (2018) Social innovation. In: HutterMKnoblauchHRammertW, et al. (eds) Innovation Society Today: Perspectives, Fields, and Cases. Wiesbaden: Springer, 371–391.
85.
SchumpeterJA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. New Brunswick, NJ; London: Transaction Publishers.
86.
SgaragliFMontanariF (2016) Libro bianco di Milano sull’innovazione sociale. Accelerare l’ecosistema locale per l'innovazione sociale. Milan: Comune di Milano e Fondazione Giacomo Brodolini.
87.
SwyngedouwE (2005) Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies42(11): 1991–2006.
88.
SwyngedouwEMoulaertF (2010) Socially innovative projects, governance dynamics and urban change. In: MoulaertFSwyngedouwEMartinelliF, et al. (eds) Can Neighbourhoods Save the City? Community Development and Social Innovation. London; New York: Routledge, 219–234.
89.
SwyngedouwEWilsonJ (2014) There is no alternative. In: WilsonJSwyngedouwE (eds) The Post-Political and Its Discontents: Spaces of Depoliticisation, Spectres of Radical Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 299–312.
90.
TardeG (1898) Les Lois sociales: Esquisse d’une sociologie. Paris: Félix Alcan.
91.
TortolaPD (2016) Europeanization in time: Assessing the legacy of URBAN in a mid-size Italian City. European Planning Studies24(1): 96–115.
92.
TremblayDGPilatiT (2013) Social innovation through arts and creativity. In: MoulaertF (ed.) The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 67–79.
93.
Van Der HaveRPRubalcabaL (2016) Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies?Research Policy45(9): 1923–1935.
94.
Van DyckBVan Den BroeckP (2013) Social innovation: A territorial process. In: MoulaertF (ed.) The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 131–141.
95.
VigarGCowiePHealeyP (2020) Innovation in planning: Creating and securing public value. European Planning Studies28: 521–540.
96.
WacquantL (2012) Three steps to a historical anthropology of actually existing neoliberalism. Social Anthropology20(1): 66–79.
97.
WatsonV (2014) Co-production and collaboration in planning – The difference. Planning Theory & Practice15(1): 62–76.
