DyckmanJW (1978) Three crises of American planning. In: BurchellRWSternliebG (eds) Planning Theory in the 1980s: A Search for Future Directions. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, 279–295.
4.
EvansPBRueschemeyerDSkocpolT (1985) Bringing the State Back in. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
FainsteinNIFainsteinSS (1978) New debates in urban planning: The impact of Marxist theory within the United States. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research3(1–3): 381–403.
6.
FaludiA (1973) A Reader in Planning Theory. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
7.
FishmanR (2000) The American Planning Tradition: Culture and Policy. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
8.
ForesterJ (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
ForesterJ (2009) Dealing with Differences: Dramas of Mediating Public Disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
FriedmanM (1982) Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
FriedmannJ (1973) Retracking America: A Theory of Transactive Planning. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.
GrabowSHeskinA (1973) Foundations for a radical concept of planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners39(2): 106–114.
14.
HarveyD (1978) On planning the ideology of planning. In: BurchellRWSternliebG (eds) Planning Theory in the 1980s. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, 213–233.
HirschmanAO (1967) Development Projects Observed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
17.
HochC (1984) Pragmatism, planning, and power. Journal of Planning Education and Research4(2): 86–95.
18.
HochC (2006) Emotions and planning. Planning Theory & Practice7(4): 367–382.
19.
HochCSlaytonRA (1989) New Homeless and Old: Community and the Skid Row Hotel. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
20.
HochCDaltonLCSoFS (eds) (2000) The Practice of Local Government Planning. Washington, DC: American Planning Association for the ICMA University by the International City/County Management Association.
21.
HudsonBMGallowayTDKaufmanJL (1979) Comparison of current planning theories: Counterparts and contradictions. Journal of the American Planning Association45(4): 387–398.
22.
KahnemanD (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Macmillan.
23.
LalD (1984) Political Economy of the Predatory State. Washington, DC: World Bank.
24.
MarrisP (1974) Loss and Change. New York: Pantheon Books.
25.
MarrisP (1980) The uprooting of meaning. In: CoelhoGAhmedP (eds) Uprooting and Development. Boston, MA: Springer, 101–116.
26.
MarrisP (1982) Social change and reintegration. Journal of Planning Education and Research2(1): 54–61.
27.
MarrisP (1996) The Politics of Uncertainty: Attachment in Private and Public Life. New York: Routledge.
28.
O’DonnellGA (1973) Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics (No. 9). Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies, University of California.
29.
SanyalB (1989) Poor countries’ students in rich countries’ universities: Possibilities of planning education for the twenty-first century. Journal of Planning Education and Research8(3): 139–155.
30.
SanyalB (1994) Cooperative Autonomy: The Dialectic of State-NGOs Relationship in Developing Countries (Research Series: International Institute for Labour Studies No. 100). Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
31.
SanyalB (1996) Meaning, not interest: Motivation for progressive planning. In: MandelbaumSJMazzaLBurchellRW (eds) Explorations in Planning Theory. New York: Routledge, 134–150.
32.
SanyalB (2018) A planners’ planner: John Friedmann’s quest for a general theory of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association84(2): 179–191.
33.
SchönDA (1982) Some of what a planner knows: A case study of knowing-in-practice. Journal of the American Planning Association48(3): 351–364.
34.
SchwartzBSharpeK (2010) Practical Wisdom: The Right Way to Do the Right Thing. New York: Riverhead Books.
35.
VidyarthiSHochCBasmajianC (2013) Making sense of India’s spatial plan-making practice: Enduring approach or emergent variations?Planning Theory & Practice14(1): 57–74.