BastaC (2015) From justice in planning toward planning for justice: A capability approach. Planning Theory15: 190–212.
2.
BastaC (2017) On Marx’s human significance, Harvey’s right to the city, and Nussbaum’s capability approach. Planning Theory16: 345–363.
3.
CampbellHMarshallR (2002) Utilitarianism’s bad breath? A re-evaluation of the public interest justification for planning. Planning Theory1: 163–187.
4.
FainsteinSS (2010) The Just City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
5.
LennonM (2015) Finding purpose in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research35: 63–75.
6.
LennonM (2017) On ‘the subject’ of planning’s public interest. Planning Theory16: 150–168.
7.
LennonMDouglasOScottM (2019) Responsive environments: An outline of a method for determining context sensitive planning interventions to enhance health and wellbeing. Land Use Policy80: 68–78.
8.
MaidmentC (2016) In the public interest? Planning in the Peak District National Park. Planning Theory15: 366–385.
9.
MattilaH (2016) Can collaborative planning go beyond locally focused notions of the ‘public interest’? The potential of Habermas’ concept of ‘generalizable interest’ in pluralist and trans-scalar planning discourses. Planning Theory15: 344–365.
10.
MoroniS (2019) Constitutional and post-constitutional problems: Reconsidering the issues of public interest, agonistic pluralism and private property in planning. Planning Theory18: 5–23.
11.
SaletW (2018) Public Norms and Aspirations. New York: Routledge.
12.
TaitM (2016) Planning and the public interest: Still a relevant concept for planners?Planning Theory15: 335–343.
13.
WagenaarH (2011) Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.