Is Hayek vs Kelsen helpful for planning theory? – A comment on Slaev’s types of planning and property rights by Benjamin Davy

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Booth

(2007) The control of discretion: Planning and the common-law tradition. Planning Theory 6(2): 127–145.

Davy

(2008) Plan it without a condom! Planning Theory 7(3): 301–317.

Davy

(2014) Polyrational property: Rules for the many uses of land. International Journal of the Commons 8(2): 472–492.

Davy

(2016) Land Policy: Planning and the Spatial Consequences of Property. Oxford: Routledge (first published as Ashgate Hardback 2012).

Hayek

(1973) Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 1: Rules and Order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Hayek

(1976) Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 2: The Mirage of Social Justice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Hayek

(2006 [1960]) The Constitution of Liberty. London; New York: Routledge.

Hayek

(2007 [1944]) The Road to Serfdom: Text and Documents (ed Caldwell

). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Kelsen

(1955) Democracy and socialism. In: Conference on jurisprudence and politics, 30 April 1954, Conference Series No. 15. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

10.

Moroni

(2007) Planning, liberty and the rule of law. Planning Theory 6(2): 146–163.

11.

Moroni

(2010) Rethinking the theory and practice of land-use regulation: Towards nomocracy. Planning Theory 9(2): 137–155.

12.

Slaev

(2016a) Types of planning and property rights. Planning Theory 15(1): 23–41.

13.

Slaev

(2016b) Property rights and methods of nomocratic planning. Planning Theory 15(3): 274–293.

14.

Slaev

(2017a) Coasean versus Pigovian solutions to the problem of social cost: the role of common entitlements. International Journal of the Commons 11(2): 950–968.

15.

Slaev

(2017b) The relationship between planning and the market from the perspective of property rights theory: A transaction cost analysis. Planning Theory 16(4): 404–424.