AdamsDTiesdellS (2010) Planners as market actors: Rethinking state-market relations in land and property. Planning Theory & Practice11(2): 187–207.
2.
AlbouyD (2009) What are cities worth? Land rents, local productivity and the capitalization of amenity values. NBER Working Paper 14981. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: www.nber.org/papers/w14981
3.
AlexanderER (1987) Planning as development control: Is that all urban planning is for?Town Planning Review58(4): 453–467.
4.
AlexanderER (1989) Is planning a word or a concept: A response to Lincoln Allison’s “reply.”Town Planning Review60(4): 459–460.
5.
AlexanderER (2001) A transaction-cost theory of land use planning and development control. Town Planning Review72(1): 45–76.
6.
AlexanderER (2002) The public interest in planning: From legitimation to substantive plan evaluation. Planning Theory1(3): 226–249.
7.
AlexanderER (2005) What do planners need to know? Identifying needed competencies, methods and skills. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research22(2): 91–106.
8.
AlexanderER (2008) Between state and market: A third way of planning. International Planning Studies13(2): 119–149.
9.
AlexanderER (2011) Letter to the editors: Insurgent planning in the Republic of Buryatia, Russia. Journal of Planning Education and Research31(2): 220.
10.
AlexanderER (2013) Forbidden fruit? The expert planner: A post-postmodernist take on planners in spatial planning and development control. Presented at the Joint AESOP-ACSP Congress, Dublin, 15–20 July.
11.
AlexanderER (2014a) Land-property markets and planning: A special case. Land Use Policy41: 533–540.
12.
AlexanderER (2014b) “Planning” or E-Planning? Implications for theory, education and practice. International Journal of E-Planning Research3(1): 1–15.
13.
AlexanderERMazzaLMoroniS (2012) Planning without plans? Nomocracy or teleocracy for social-spatial ordering. Progress in Planning77: 37–87.
14.
AllisonG (1986) What is planning for?Town Planning Review51(1): 5–16.
15.
AllisonG (1988) Is planning a word or a concept? A reply to E.R. Alexander. Town Planning Review59(1): 105–109.
16.
BarnesB (2001) Practice as collective action. In: SchatzkiTRKnorr-CetinaKvon SavignyE (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. New York: Routledge, 17–28.
17.
ChiodelliF (2012) Repoliticising space through technical rules. Planning Theory11(2): 115–127.
18.
DavidoffPReinerTA (1962) A choice theory of planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners28(3): 103–115.
19.
De NeufvilleJI (1983) Planning theory and practice: Bridging the gap. Journal of Planning Education and Research3(1): 35–45.
20.
EllisC (2002) The new urbanism: Critiques and rebuttals. Journal of Urban Design7(3): 261–291.
21.
EllisC (2005) Planning methods and good city form. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research22(2): 138–147.
22.
FaludiA (1987) A Decision-Centred View of Environmental Planning. Oxford: Pergamon.
23.
FischlerR (2012) Fifty theses on urban planning and urban planners. Journal of Planning Education and Research32(1): 107–114.
24.
ForesterJ (1989) Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
25.
FriedmannJ (1978) The epistemology of social practice: A critique of objective knowledge. Theory & Society6: 75–92.
26.
FriedmannJ (1987) Planning in the Public Domain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
FultonW (1996) The New Urbanism: Hope or Hype for American Communities?Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
28.
GibbonsMNovotnyHLimogesC. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
29.
GunderMHillierJ (2009) Planning in Ten Words or Less: A Lacanian Entanglement with Spatial Planning. Farnham: Ashgate.
30.
HarrisB (1996) Planning technologies and planning theories. In: MandelbaumSJMazzaLBurchellRW (eds) Explorations in Planning Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, 483–496.
31.
HarrisonP (2014) Making planning theory real. Planning Theory13(1): 65–81.
32.
HartmannT (2012) Wicked problems and clumsy solutions: Planning as expectation management. Planning Theory11(3): 242–256.
33.
HillierJ (2010) Introduction. In: HillierJHealeyP (eds) The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning. Farnham: Ashgate, 1–34.
34.
HolgersenS (2015) Spatial planning as condensation of social relations: A dialectical approach. Planning Theory14(1): 15–22.
35.
JasanoffS (2004) Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In: JasanoffS (ed.) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. New York: Routledge, 13–45.
36.
Knorr-CetinaK (2001) Objectual practice. In: SchatzkiTRKnorr-CetinaKvon SavignyE (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. New York: Routledge, 175–188.
37.
LordA (2014) Towards a non-theoretical understanding of planning. Planning Theory13(1): 26–43.
38.
LundH (2003) Testing the claims of New Urbanism: Local access, pedestrian travel, and neighboring behaviors. Journal of the American Planning Association69(4): 414–429.
39.
MarcusenA (2000) Planning as craft and as philosophy. In: RodwinLSanyalB (eds) The Profession of City Planning. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 261–274.
40.
MazzaL (1995) Technical knowledge, practical reason and the planner’s responsibility. Town Planning Review66(4): 389–410.
41.
MazzaL (2002) Technical knowledge and planning actions. Planning Theory1(1): 11–26.
42.
MorrisAEJ (2013) History of Urban Form before the Industrial Revolutions. 3rd edn.New York: Routledge.
43.
NeedhamB (2013) A Significant Contribution to Knowledge. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.
44.
NorthDC (1977) Markets and other allocation systems in history: The challenge of Karl Polanyi. Journal of European Economic History, 703–716. Available at: community.plu.edu/~315j06/doc/markets-other.pdf
45.
RapoportA (1979) On the cultural origins of settlements. In: CataneseAJSnyderJC (eds) Introduction to Urban Planning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 31–36.
46.
RouseJ (2001) Two concepts of practices. In: SchatzkiTRKnorr-CetinaKvon SavignyE (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. New York: Routledge, 189–198.
47.
RydinY (2007) Reexamining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning Theory6(1): 52–68.
48.
SchatzkiTR (2001) Practice mind-ed orders. In: SchatzkiTRKnorr-CetinaKvon SavignyE (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. New York: Routledge, 42–55.
49.
SweetEL (2011) Response to “Letter to the Editors”: Action and planning—Where do we draw the line?Journal of Planning Education and Research31(2): 221–222.
50.
SweetELChakarsE (2010) Identity, culture, land and language: Stories of insurgent planning in the Republic of Buryatia, Russia. Journal of Planning Education and Research30(2): 198–209.
51.
SwidlerA (2001) What anchors cultural practices. In: SchatzkiTRKnorr-CetinaKvon SavignyE (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. New York: Routledge, 74–92.
52.
TalenE (1999) Sense of community and neighborhood form: An assessment of the social doctrine of New Urbanism. Urban Studies36(8): 1361–1379.
53.
ThrogmortonJA (1992) Planning as persuasive storytelling about the future: Negotiating an electric power rate settlement in Illinois. Journal of Planning Education and Research12(1): 17–31.
54.
TurnerS (2001) Throwing out the tacit rule book: Learning and practices. In: SchatzkiTRKnorr-CetinaKvon SavignyE (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. New York: Routledge, 120–130.
55.
Van HulstM (2012) Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning. Planning Theory11(3): 299–318.
56.
VickersSG (1968) Value Systems and Social Process. New York: Basic Books.
57.
WildavskyAB (1973) If planning is everything, maybe it’s nothing. Policy Sciences4(2): 127–153.