A central question within planning theory is how changes between the relations of ‘grand institutions’ such as state, market and education influence the formation of objects ‘on the ground’. Drawing upon Foucault’s work, this article contributes to the understanding of these relations and argues that Foucault’s work provides a powerful set of tools to understand the formation of subjects and objects in spatial planning. It presents the case of the ‘innovation campus’ in the Netherlands, a model which originated from the ‘university campus’. Through an analysis of multiple campus-building ‘events’, the innovation campus appears as a model to entice and shape a new object: the entrepreneurial researcher.
BanningC (2010) Innovatieplatform heeft maar weinig bereikt; Na zeven jaar is Nederland gedaald op ranglijst World Economic Forum. NRC Handelsblad. Amsterdam: De Persgroep Nederland, 13.
3.
BaumanZ (1998) On postmodern uses of sex. Theory Culture & Society15: 19–33.
4.
Bekius-WilkesJEvertzenMde HoopL. (1991) Van experiment in het bos tot ondernemende universiteit. Enschede: Universiteit Twente.
5.
BenneworthPCharlesDMadanipourA (2010) Building localized interactions between universities and cities through university spatial development. European Planning Studies18: 1611–1629.
6.
BenneworthPHospersG-JTimmermanP (2009) Who builds ‘science cities’ and ‘knowledge parks’? In: OakeyRGroenAVan der SijdeP. (eds) New Technology-Based Firms in the New Millenium. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 147–164.
7.
BoekholtPNagleMZuijdamF (2009) Campusvorming: Studie naar de meerwaarde van campussen en de rol van de overheid met betrekking tot campusvorming. Amsterdam: Technopolis Group.
8.
BoyneR (2000) Post-panopticism. Economy and Society29: 285–307.
9.
Buck Consultants International (BCI) (2009) Fysieke investeringsopgaven voor campussen van nationaal belang. Nijmegen: BCI.
10.
Buck Consultants International (BCI) (2010a) Ontwikkeling van (clusters en) campussen in Gelderland. Nijmegen: Commissioned by the Province of Gelderland.
11.
Buck Consultants International (BCI) (2010b) Op weg naar een Brainport Campussenstragie. Eindhoven: Samenwerkingsverband Regio Eindhoven (SRE).
12.
Buck Consultants International (BCI) (2012) Actueel beeld campussen in Nederland. Nijmegen: BCI.
13.
CertomàC (2013) Expanding the ‘dark side of planning’: Governmentality and biopolitics in urban garden planning. Planning Theory. Epub ahead of print 27October. DOI: 10.1177/1473095213506202.
14.
ChesbroughH (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
15.
ClarkB (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: Pergamon; IAU Press.
16.
DeanM (2010) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: SAGE.
17.
DuineveldMVan AsscheK (2011) The power of tulips: Constructing nature and heritage in a contested landscape. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning13: 79–98.
18.
DuineveldMVan AsscheKBeunenR (2013) Making things irreversible. Object stabilization in urban planning and design. Geoforum46: 16–24.
19.
EcoU (1984) Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. Basingstoke; London: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
EldenSCramptonJ (2007) Space, Knowledge and Power: Foucault and Geography. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
21.
FaludiAVan der ValkA (1994) Rule and Order: Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
22.
FlyvbjergB (2002) Bringing power to planning research: One researcher’s praxis story. Journal of Planning Education and Research21: 353–366.
23.
FoucaultM (1967) Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. Abingdon: Routledge.
24.
FoucaultM (1970) The Order of Things. London; New York: Routledge.
25.
FoucaultM (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London; New York: Routledge.
26.
FoucaultM (1973) The Birth of the Clinic. Abingdon: Routledge.
27.
FoucaultM (1976) The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge, vol. 1. London: Penguin Books.
28.
FoucaultM (1984) FOUCAULT. In: HuismanD (ed.) Dictionnaire des philosophes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 942–944.
29.
FoucaultM (1997) What is critique? In: LotringerSHochrothL (eds) The Politics of Truth. New York: Semiotext(e), pp. 191–211.
30.
FoucaultM (2003) Society Must be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76. New York: Picador.
31.
FoucaultM (2008) The Birth of Biopolitcs: Lectures at Collège de France 1978–1979. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
FoucaultM (2009) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
FoucaultMFaubionJ (2001) Power. In: RabinowP (ed.) Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984. New York: The New Press, pp. 111–133.
34.
FoucaultMRabinowP (1997) Ethics, subjectivity and truth. In: RabinowP (ed.) Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984. New York: The New Press.
35.
GaneN (2012) The governmentalities of neoliberalism: Panopticism, post-panopticism and beyond. The Sociological Review60: 611–634.
36.
GroenmanB (2001) Van landgoed tot kenniscampus. Enschede: Universiteit Twente.
37.
GunderM (2010a) Making planning theory matter: A Lacanian encounter with phronesis. International Planning Studies15: 37–51.
38.
GunderM (2010b) Planning as the ideology of (neoliberal) space. Planning Theory9: 298–314.
39.
GunderMHillierJ (2009) Planning in Ten Words or Less: A Lacanian Entanglement with Spatial Planning. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
40.
GunderMMouatC (2002) Symbolic violence and victimization in planning processes: A reconnoitre of the New Zealand resource management act. Planning Theory1: 124–145.
41.
HillierJ (2002) Shadows of Power: An Allegory of Prudence in Land-Use Planning. Abingdon: Routledge.
42.
HuxleyM (2008) Space and government: Governmentality and geography. Geography Compass2: 163–168.
43.
Innovatieplatform (2010) Nederland 2020: terug in de top 5: De economische agenda, Innovatief, Internationaal, Involverend. The Hague: Innovatieplatform.
KooijHJVan AsscheKAMLagendijkA (2014) Open concepts as crystallisation points and enablers of discursive configurations: The case of the innovation campus in the Netherlands. European Planning Studies22(1): 84–100.
46.
KrijnsenM (2011) De nieuwe campus: Leren en leven op de univeristeit Twente in de 21e eeuw. Enschede: Univeristeit Twente.
47.
Ministerie van Algemene Zaken (AZ) (2010) Regeerakkoord VVD-CDA: Vrijheid en verantwoordelijkheid. The Hague: AZ.
48.
Ministerie van Economische Zaken (EZ) (2004) Pieken in de Delta: Gebiedsgerichte economische perspectieven. The Hague: Ruimtelijk Economisch Beleid, EZ.
49.
Ministerie van Economische Zaken (EZ) (2007) Pieken in Zuidoost-Nederland. Brochure voor subsidieaanvragers 2007. The Hague: Programma Zuidoost-Nederland, EZ.
50.
Ministerie van Economische Zaken (EZ) (2010a) Subsidieregeling sterktes in de regio. Regeling van de Minister van Economische Zaken van 3 December 2008, inclusief wijzigingen t/m 29 January 2010. WJZ/8186714. The Hague: EZ.
51.
Ministerie van Economische Zaken (EZ) (2010b) Verkiezingsfiches Ministerie van Economische Zaken. The Hague: EZ.
52.
Ministerie van Economische Zaken (EZ) (2013) Bedrijvenbeleid: Koersvast en Toekomstgericht. The Hague: Directie Topsectoren en Industriebeleid, EZ, 16 pp.
53.
Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie (EL&I) (2011a) Naar de top: de hoofdlijnen van het nieuwe bedrijfslevenbeleid. The Hague: Directie Algemene Economische Politiek, EL&I.
54.
Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie (EL&I) (2011b) NAAR DE TOP: Het bedrijvenbeleid in actie(s). The Hague: EL&I.
55.
Ministerie van Onderwijs en Kunsten and Wetenschappen (1963) Memorie van toelichting behorende bij machtigingswet technische rijkshogeschool te Enschede (incl. bijlagen). The Hague: Staatsuitgeverij.
56.
NautaF (2008) Het innovatieplatform: Innoveren in het centrum van de macht/met survivaltips voor vernieuwers in de polder. The Hague: SDU Uitgevers.
57.
PeirceCSWelbyV (1977) Semiotic and Significs: The Correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Lady Victoria Welby. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
58.
RichardsonT (1996) Foucauldian discourse: Power and truth in urban and regional policy making. European Planning Studies4: 279–292.
59.
RichardsonT (2002) Freedom and control in planning: Using discourse in the pursuit of reflexive practice. Planning Theory & Practice3: 353–361.
60.
RoseNO’MalleyPValverdeM (2009) Governmentality (Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper). Annual Review of Law and Social Science2: 83–104.
61.
SER Brabant (2009) Advies Kennis werkt! Handreikingen voor campussenbeleid. Den Bosch: SER Brabant.
62.
ThrogmortonJA (2003) Planning as persuasive storytelling in a global-scale web of relationships. Planning Theory2: 125–151.
63.
TimmermanPBenneworthP (2006) Architectuur in Twente: Een nieuw Kennispark. Kunst en Wetenschap15(1): 11–12.
64.
TurnerPV (1987) Campus: An American Planning Tradition. Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.
65.
Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal (2010) Vragen gesteld door de leden der Kamer, met de daarop door de regering gegeven antwoorden (No. 1868) Ministerie van Economische Zaken (ed.). The Hague: Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal, 3 pp.
66.
Universiteit Twente (2012) Kwaliteit, profilering en ambities in high tech, human touch: Voorstel voor de prestatieafspraak tussen de Universiteit Twente en het Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap voor de periode 2013–2016. Enschede: Universiteit Twente.
67.
Van AsscheKBeunenRDuineveldM (2014) Evolutionary Governance Theory: An Introduction. New York: Springer International Publishing.
68.
Van AsscheKBeunenRDuineveldM. (2013) Co-evolutions of planning and design: Risks and benefits of design perspectives in planning systems. Planning Theory12: 177–198.
69.
Van DijkT (2011) Imagining future places. Planning Theory10: 124–143.
