Despite the fact that spatial planning forms one of the key constituents of territorial politics, territory and territoriality have been largely neglected in the studies of European spatial planning. This article seeks to address this shortcoming by considering spatial planning through the recent research on territories and territorial politics in political geography. The article suggests that European spatial planning ought to be conceptualized as a political technology of territory of the European Union, whose effectiveness is not dependent on the acquisition of formal policy status but stems from its capacity to fuse populations and geographical areas into manageable entities, from its reputation as apolitical management of space as well as from its resonance with current political tastes.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG (2009) Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environment and Planning A41(3): 617–633.
2.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG (2012) Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus?Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers (New Series) 37(1): 89–103.
3.
AntikainenJVartiainenP (2006) A patchwork of urban regions – Structures and policies in support of polycentricity. In: EskelinenHHirvonenT (eds) Positioning Finland in a European Space. Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment and Ministry of the Interior, 30–40.
4.
AntonsichM (2009) On territory, the nation-state and the crisis of the hyphen. Progress in Human Geography33(6): 789–806.
5.
BarnesTJMincaC (2012) Nazi spatial theory: The dark geographies of Carl Schmitt and Walter Christaller. Annals of the Association of American Geographers103(3): 669–687.
6.
BarryA (1993) The European Community and European government: Harmonization, mobility and space. Economy and Society22(3): 314–326.
7.
BerezinM (2003) Introduction/territory, emotion and identity: Spatial recalibration in a new Europe. In: BerezinMSchainM (eds) Europe without Borders: Remapping Territory, Citizenship and Identity in a Transnational Age. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp.1–30.
8.
BMVBS (2007) Territorial agenda of the European Union. Agreed on the occasion of the informal ministerial meeting on urban development and territorial cohesion, Leipzig, 24–25 May. Leipzig: Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs.
9.
BöhmeK (2002) Nordic Echoes of European Spatial Planning: Discursive Integration in Practice. Stockholm: Nordregio.
10.
BöhmeKWaterhoutB (2008) The Europeanisation of planning. In: FaludiA (ed.) European Spatial Research and Planning. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 225–248.
11.
BourdieuP (1993) The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. In: JohnsonR (ed.) The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Cambridge: Polity Press, 29–73.
12.
BuserM (2012) The production of space in metropolitan regions: A Lefebvrian analysis of governance and spatial change. Planning Theory11(3): 279–298.
13.
European Conference of Ministers Responsible for Spatial/Regional Planning (CEMAT) (1983) European regional/spatial planning charter. Adopted on 20May1983 at Torremolinos. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
14.
European Conference of Ministers Responsible for Spatial/Regional Planning (CEMAT) (2007) Spatial Development Glossary: Territory and Landscape. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
15.
ClarkJJonesA (2008) The spatialities of Europeanisation: Territory, government and power in ‘EUrope’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers (New Series) 33(3): 300–318.
16.
Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1991) Europe 2000: Outlook for the Development of the Community’s Territory. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
17.
Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1999) European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
18.
Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2008) Green paper on territorial cohesion: Turning territorial diversity into strength. COM(2008) 616 final,Brussels, 6.10.2008.
19.
Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2010) EUROPE 2020: A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM (2010) final, Brussels, 3.3.2010.
20.
Council of the European Union (2011) Territorial agenda of the European Union 2020: Towards an inclusive, smart and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development, Gödöllő, Hungary19 May 2011.
21.
DavoudiS (2003) Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies11(8): 979–999.
22.
DavoudiS (2009) Asymmetric development in spatial planning: Positivist content and post-modernist processes? In: DavoudiSStrangeI (eds) Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning. London: Routledge, 207–243.
23.
DavoudiSStrangeI (eds) (2009) Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning. London: Routledge.
24.
DeasILordA (2006) From a new regionalism to an unusual regionalism? The emergence of non-standard regional spaces and lessons for the territorial reorganization of the state. Urban Studies43(10): 1847–1877.
25.
De JongMEdelenbosJ (2007) An insider’s look into policy transfer in transnational expert networks. European Planning Studies15(5): 687–706.
26.
DelantyGRumfordC (2005) Rethinking Europe: Social Theory and the Implications of Europeanization. London: Routledge.
27.
DührSColombCNadinV (2010) European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation. London: Routledge.
EldenS (2010) Land, terrain, territory. Progress in Human Geography34(6): 799–817.
30.
EskelinenHLapintieKKokkonenM (2000) Nordic Legacy and the European connection: The emergence of integrated spatial planning in Finland. Built Environment26(1): 41–51.
31.
European Observation Network for Territorial Development and Cohesion (ESPON) (2011) ESPON Projects: Overview by November 2011 (ESPON 2013 Programme). Available at: http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_ProjectOverview/ (accessed 5 January 2014).
European Commission (EU) (1997) The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
34.
FaludiA (ed.) (2007) Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
35.
FaludiA (1997) A roving band of planners. Built Environment23(4): 281–287.
36.
FaludiA (2010) Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age?London: Routledge.
37.
FaludiA (2013) Territorial cohesion and subsidiarity under the European Union treaties: A critique of the ‘Territorialism’ underlying. Regional Studies47(9): 1594–1606.
38.
FaludiAWaterhoutB (2002) The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective: No Masterplan. London: Routledge.
39.
FerreiraASykesOBateyP (2009) Planning theory or planning theories? The hydra model and its implications for planning education. Journal for Education in the Built Environment4(2): 29–54.
40.
FloridaR (2005) Cities and the Creative Class. London: Routledge.
41.
FloridaR (2008) Who’s Your City? How the Creative Economy Is Making Where to Live the Most Important Decision of Your Life. New York: Basic Books.
42.
GiannakourouG (2005) Transforming spatial planning policy in Mediterranean countries: Europeanization and domestic change. European Planning Studies13(2): 319–331.
43.
GovernaFSaloneC (2005) Italy and European spatial policies: Polycentrism, urban networks and local innovation practices. European Planning Studies13(2): 265–283.
44.
GrahamSHealeyP (1999) Relational concepts of space and place: Issues for planning theory and practice. European Planning Studies7(5): 623–646.
45.
GualiniE (2003) Cross-border Governance: Inventing Regions in a Trans-national Multi-level Polity. disP: The Planning Review39(152): 43–52.
46.
GualiniE (2004) Multi-level Governance and Institutional Change: The Europeanization of Regional Policy in Italy. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
47.
GunderM (2010) Planning as the ideology of (neoliberal) space. Planning Theory9(4): 298–314.
48.
HaughtonGAllmendingerPCounsellD. (2010) The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries. London: Routledge.
49.
HealeyP (2004) The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28(1): 45–67.
50.
HealeyP (2006) Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning. European Planning Studies14(4): 525–546.
51.
HealeyPKhakeeAMotteA. (eds) (1997) Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe. London: University College London Press.
52.
HillierJ (2010a) Introduction. In: HillierJHealeyP (eds) The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 1–34.
53.
HillierJ (2010b) Introduction to part two. In: HillierJHealeyP (eds) The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 235–250.
54.
HillierJHealeyP (eds) (2010) The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
55.
Janin RivolinUFaludiA (2005) The hidden face of European spatial planning: Innovations in governance. European Planning Studies13(2): 195–215.
56.
JauhiainenJSHarvioSLuukkonenJ. (2007) Kehittämisvyöhykkeet aluekehittämisessä. Sisäasiainministeriön julkaisu 22/2007. Helsinki: Sisäasiainministeriö.
57.
JensenOBRichardsonT (2004) Making European Space: Mobility, Power and Territorial Identity. London: Routledge.
58.
JonasAEG (2012) Region and place: Regionalism in question. Progress in Human Geography36(2): 263–272.
59.
KunzmannK (2006) The Europeanization of spatial planning. In: AdamsNAldenJHarrisN (eds) Regional Development and Spatial Planning in an Enlarged European Union. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 43–63.
60.
KuusM (2011) Whose regional expertise? Political geographies of knowledge in the European Union. European Urban and Regional Studies18(3): 275–288.
61.
Law-YoneH (2007) Another planning theory? Rewriting the meta-narrative. Planning Theory6(3): 315–326.
62.
LoveringJ (1999) Theory led by policy: The inadequacies of the ‘New Regionalism’ (Illustrated from the Case of Wales). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23(2): 379–395.
63.
LuukkonenJ (2011) The Europeanization of regional development: Local strategies and European spatial visions in northern Finland. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography93(3): 253–270.
64.
LuukkonenJ (2012) Making European space in spatial planning in Northern Finland. Growth and Change43(3): 392–418.
65.
MadanipourAHullAHealeyP (eds) (2001) The Governance of Place: Space and Planning Processes. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
66.
Ministry of Employment and the Economy (2010) Suomen aluekehittämisstrategia 2020. Helsinki: Ministry of Employment and the Economy.
67.
Ministry of Environment (1995) Alueiden käyttö ja aluerakenne vuonna 2017. Helsinki: Ministry of Environment.
68.
Ministry of Environment (2006) Kilpailukykyä, hyvinvointia ja ekotehokkuutta: Suomen aluerakenteen ja alueidenkäytön kehityskuva. Suomen Ympäristö 31/2006. Helsinki: Ministry of Environment
69.
Ministry of Interior (1976) Valtakunnallinen keskusten luokittelu 1973/1974. Sisäasiainministeriö, Kaavoitus- ja rakennusosasto 53/1976. Helsinki: Ministry of Interior.
70.
MoisioS (2008) Towards attractive and cost-efficient state space: Political geography of the production of state transformation in Finland. World Political Science Review4(3): 1–34.
71.
MoisioS (2011) Geographies of Europeanization: The EU’s spatial planning as a politics of scale. In: BialasiewiczL (ed.) Europe in the World: EU Geopolitics and the Transformation of European Space. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 19–40.
72.
MoisioS (2013) Spatial pathways to success: Communicating networks and proximities through state space in Finland. In: ChristmannG (ed.) Towards a Communicative Construction of Spaces. London: Routledge.
73.
MoisioSLeppänenL (2007) Towards a Nordic competition state? Politico-economic transformation of statehood in Finland, 1965–2005. Fennia185(2): 63–87.
74.
MoisioSLuukkonenJ (2014) European spatial planning as governmentality: An inquiry into rationalities, techniques and manifestations. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. Epub ahead of print 14 February 2014. DOI: 10.1068/c13158.
75.
MooreA (2008) Rethinking scale as a geographical category: From analysis to practice. Progress in Human Geography32(2): 203–225.
76.
PainterJ (2010) Rethinking territory. Antipode42(5): 1090–1118.
77.
PhelpsNATewdwr-JonesM (2008) If geography is anything, maybe it’s planning’s alter ego? Reflections on policy relevance in two disciplines concerned with place and space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers (New Series) 33(4): 566–584.
78.
RovnyiIBachmannV (2012) Reflexive geographies of Europeanization. Geography Compass6(5): 260–274.
79.
RumfordC (2006) Rethinking European spaces: Territory, borders, governance. Comparative European Politics4(2–3): 127–140.
80.
SchönP (2005) Territorial cohesion in Europe?Planning Theory and Practice6(3): 389–400.
81.
ScottAJ (2001) Globalization and the rise of city-regions. European Planning Studies9(7): 813–826.
82.
ScottJW (2002) Baltic Sea regionalism, EU geopolitics and symbolic geographies of co-operation. Journal of Baltic Studies33(2): 137–155.
83.
StorperM (1995) The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a Nexus of untraded interdependencies. European Urban and Regional Studies2(3): 191–221.
84.
SykesOShawD (2008) Investigating territorial positioning by sub-state territories in Europe. Regional & Federal Studies18(1): 55–76.
85.
Tewdwr-JonesMWilliamsRH (2001) The European Dimension of British Planning. London: Spon Press.
86.
ThomasH (2007) From radicalism to reformism. Planning Theory6(3): 332–335.
87.
VartiainenP (1998) Suomalaisen aluepolitiikan kehitysvaiheita (Aluekehitysosaston julkaisu 6). Helsinki: Sisäasiainministeriö.
88.
WaterhoutB (2007) Episodes of Europeanization of Dutch national spatial planning. Planning Practice & Research22(3): 309–327.
89.
WilliamsRH (1996) European Union Spatial Policy and Planning. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
