AlexanderER (1994) The non-Euclidean mode of planning: What is it to be?Journal of the American Planning Association60(3): 372–376.
2.
AlexanderER (2005) What do planners need to know: Identifying needed competencies, methods and skills. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research22(2): 91–106.
3.
FriedmannJ (2008) The uses of planning theory: A bibliographic essay. Journal of Planning Education and Research28: 247–257.
4.
FriedmannJ (1998) Planning theory revisited. European Planning Studies6(3): 245–253.
5.
FriedmannJ (1994) The utility of non-Euclidean planning. Journal of the American Planning Association60(3): 377–379.
6.
FriedmannJ (1993) Toward a non-Euclidean mode of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association59(4): 482–485.
7.
FriedmannJ (1992) Empowerment: The Politics of Alternative Development. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
8.
FriedmannJ (1987) Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
FriedmannJ (1979) Preface, The Good Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
FriedmannJ (1978) The epistemology of social practice: A critique of objective knowledge. Theory and Society6: 75–92.
11.
FriedmannJ (1973) Retracking America: A Theory of Transactive Planning. Garden City, NJ: Anchor/Doubleday.
12.
MazzaL (1995) Technical knowledge, practical reason and the planner’s responsibility. Town Planning Review66(4): 389–410.
13.
MazzaL (2002) Technical knowledge and planning actions. Planning Theory1(1): 11–26.
14.
MazzaL (2009) Plan and constitution – Aristotle’s Hippodamus: Towards an "ostensive" definition of spatial planning. Town Planning Review80(2): 113–141.
15.
RydinY (2007) Reexamining the role of knowledge in planning theory. Planning Theory7(2): 52–68.
16.
WebsterCLaiLWC (2003) Property Rights, Planning and Markets: Managing Spontaneous Cities. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
17.
YoungIM (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.