Dispatches from a time capsule? Moving the ANT,normativity and democracy discussion ten years down the road: an intervention in the Boelens–Rydin–Webb debate

Asdal K Borch C Moser I (2008) Editorial: The technologies of politics. Distinktion 16: 5–10.

Boelens L (2010a) Theorizing practice and practising theory: Outlines for an actor-relational approach in planning. Planning Theory 9(1): 28–62.

Boelens L (2010b) Reflection on Yvonne Rydin’s response to ‘Theorizing practice and practicing theory’. Planning Theory 9(3): 269–71.

Boelens L (2011) Beyond the limits of imperfections: Reflections on David Webb’s comments on an Actor-Relational-Approach in planning. Planning Theory 00: 1–5 (accessed 20 November 2010).

Callon M (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fisherman of St Brieuc Bay. In: Law J (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge.

Callon M Rabeharisoa V (2003) Research ‘in the wild’ and the shaping of new social identities. Technology in Society 25(2): 193–204.

Callon M Rabeharisoa V (2008) The growing engagement of emergent concerned groups in political and economic life: Lessons from the French Association of Neuromuscular Disease Patients. Science, Technology and Human Values 33: 230–61.

Callon M Lascoumes P Barthe Y (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hache E Latour B (2010) Morality or moralism: An exercise in sensitization. Common Knowledge 16(2): 311–30.

Hajer MA Wagenaar H (2005) Introduction. In Hajer MA Wagenaar H (eds) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Healey P (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hillier J (2007) Stretching Beyond the Horizon: A Multiplanar Theory of Spatial Planning and Governance. Burlington: Ashgate.

Jacobs JM Cairns S Strebel I (2007) ‘A tall storey … but, a fact just the same’: The red road high-rise as a black box. Urban Studies 44(3): 609–29.

Jones JP III Woodward K Marston SA (2007) Situating flatness. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32: 264–76.

Latour B (1998) Ein ding ist ein thing: A philosophical platform for a left European party. Concepts and Transformation 3(1/2): 97–111.

Latour B (1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour B (2001) ‘Thou shalt not take the lord’s name in vain’: Being a sort of sermon on the hesitations of religious speech. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 39(Spring): 215–34.

Latour B (2002a) War of the Worlds: What About Peace? Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Latour B (2002b) What is iconoclash? Or is there a world beyond the image wars. In Latour B Weibel P (eds) Iconoclash: Beyond the Image Wars in Science, Religion, and Art. Karlsruhe: ZKM, pp. 16–38.

Latour B (2003a) What if we talked politics a little? Contemporary Political Theory 2: 143–64.

Latour B (2003b) The promises of contructivism. In Idhe D Selinger E (eds) Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for Materiality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 27–46.

Latour B (2004a) How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body and Society 10(2/3): 205–29.

Latour B (2004b) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour B (2005a) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Latour B (2005b) From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik: How to make things public – an Introduction. In Latour B Weibel P (eds). Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–31.

Latour B (2007) Turning around politics: A note on Gerard de Vries’ paper. Social Studies of Science 37(5): 811–20.

Latour B (2009) Will non-humans be saved? An argument in ecotheology. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15(3): 459–75.

Latour B (2010) Tarde’s idea of quantification. In: Candea M (ed.) The Social After Gabriel Tarde: Debates and Assessments. London: Routledge, pp. 145–62.

Latour B (forthcoming). An attempt at a ‘Compositionist Manifesto’. Accepted for publication in New Literary History .

Latour B Yaneva A (2008) Give me a gun and I will make all buildings move: An ANT’s view of architecture. In: Geiser R (ed.) Explorations in Architecture: Teaching, Design, Research. Basel: Birkhäuser, pp. 80–89.

Law J (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.

Law J (2008) Culling, catastrophe and collectivity. Distinktion 16: 61–76.

Law J (2009a) Collateral realities, version of 29 December 2009. Available at: www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2009CollateralRealities.pdf (downloaded 10 November 2010).

Law J (2009b) The Greer-Bush test: On politics in STS, version of 23 December 2009. Available at: www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2009TheGreer-BushTest.pdf (downloaded 10 November 2010).

Marres NS (2005) No Issue, No Public: Democratic Deficits After the Displacement of Politics. Doctorate Thesis. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, Department of Philosophy.

McGuirk PM (2000) Power and policy networks in urban governance: Local government and property-led regeneration in Dublin. Urban Studies 37(4): 651–72.

Mol A (1999) Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In: Hassard J Law J (eds) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 74–89.

November V Camacho-Hübner E Latour B (2010) Entering a risky territory: Space in the age of digital navigation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28(4): 581–99.

Rydin Y (2010) Actor-network theory and planning theory: A response to Boelens. Planning Theory 9(3): 265–68.

Wainwright J (2005) Politics of nature: A review of three recent works by Bruno Latour. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 16: 115–20.

Warren M (1992) Democratic theory and self-transformation. American Political Science Review 86(1): 8–23.

Webb D (2011) The limits of associative democracy: A comment on an actor-relational approach in planning. Planning Theory 00: 1–10 (accessed 20 November 2010).