Dispatches from a time capsule? Moving the ANT,normativity and democracy discussion ten years down the road: an intervention in the Boelens–Rydin–Webb debate
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2011
Dispatches from a time capsule? Moving the ANT,normativity and democracy discussion ten years down the road: an intervention in the Boelens–Rydin–Webb debate
AsdalKBorchCMoserI (2008) Editorial: The technologies of politics. Distinktion16: 5–10.
2.
BoelensL (2010a) Theorizing practice and practising theory: Outlines for an actor-relational approach in planning. Planning Theory9(1): 28–62.
3.
BoelensL (2010b) Reflection on Yvonne Rydin’s response to ‘Theorizing practice and practicing theory’. Planning Theory9(3): 269–71.
4.
BoelensL (2011) Beyond the limits of imperfections: Reflections on David Webb’s comments on an Actor-Relational-Approach in planning. Planning Theory00: 1–5 (accessed 20 November 2010).
5.
CallonM (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fisherman of St Brieuc Bay. In: LawJ (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?London: Routledge.
6.
CallonMRabeharisoaV (2003) Research ‘in the wild’ and the shaping of new social identities. Technology in Society25(2): 193–204.
7.
CallonMRabeharisoaV (2008) The growing engagement of emergent concerned groups in political and economic life: Lessons from the French Association of Neuromuscular Disease Patients. Science, Technology and Human Values33: 230–61.
8.
CallonMLascoumesPBartheY (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
HacheELatourB (2010) Morality or moralism: An exercise in sensitization. Common Knowledge16(2): 311–30.
10.
HajerMAWagenaarH (2005) Introduction. In HajerMAWagenaarH (eds) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HillierJ (2007) Stretching Beyond the Horizon: A Multiplanar Theory of Spatial Planning and Governance. Burlington: Ashgate.
13.
JacobsJMCairnsSStrebelI (2007) ‘A tall storey … but, a fact just the same’: The red road high-rise as a black box. Urban Studies44(3): 609–29.
14.
JonesJPIIIWoodwardKMarstonSA (2007) Situating flatness. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers32: 264–76.
15.
LatourB (1998) Ein ding ist ein thing: A philosophical platform for a left European party. Concepts and Transformation3(1/2): 97–111.
16.
LatourB (1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
LatourB (2001) ‘Thou shalt not take the lord’s name in vain’: Being a sort of sermon on the hesitations of religious speech. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics39(Spring): 215–34.
18.
LatourB (2002a) War of the Worlds: What About Peace?Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
19.
LatourB (2002b) What is iconoclash? Or is there a world beyond the image wars. In LatourBWeibelP (eds) Iconoclash: Beyond the Image Wars in Science, Religion, and Art. Karlsruhe: ZKM, pp. 16–38.
20.
LatourB (2003a) What if we talked politics a little?Contemporary Political Theory2: 143–64.
21.
LatourB (2003b) The promises of contructivism. In IdheDSelingerE (eds) Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for Materiality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 27–46.
22.
LatourB (2004a) How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body and Society10(2/3): 205–29.
23.
LatourB (2004b) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
LatourB (2005a) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
LatourB (2005b) From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik: How to make things public – an Introduction. In LatourBWeibelP (eds). Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–31.
26.
LatourB (2007) Turning around politics: A note on Gerard de Vries’ paper. Social Studies of Science37(5): 811–20.
27.
LatourB (2009) Will non-humans be saved? An argument in ecotheology. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute15(3): 459–75.
28.
LatourB (2010) Tarde’s idea of quantification. In: CandeaM (ed.) The Social After Gabriel Tarde: Debates and Assessments. London: Routledge, pp. 145–62.
29.
LatourB (forthcoming). An attempt at a ‘Compositionist Manifesto’. Accepted for publication in New Literary History.
30.
LatourBYanevaA (2008) Give me a gun and I will make all buildings move: An ANT’s view of architecture. In: GeiserR (ed.) Explorations in Architecture: Teaching, Design, Research. Basel: Birkhäuser, pp. 80–89.
31.
LawJ (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.
32.
LawJ (2008) Culling, catastrophe and collectivity. Distinktion16: 61–76.
MarresNS (2005) No Issue, No Public: Democratic Deficits After the Displacement of Politics. Doctorate Thesis. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, Department of Philosophy.
36.
McGuirkPM (2000) Power and policy networks in urban governance: Local government and property-led regeneration in Dublin. Urban Studies37(4): 651–72.
37.
MolA (1999) Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In: HassardJLawJ (eds) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 74–89.
38.
NovemberVCamacho-HübnerELatourB (2010) Entering a risky territory: Space in the age of digital navigation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space28(4): 581–99.
39.
RydinY (2010) Actor-network theory and planning theory: A response to Boelens. Planning Theory9(3): 265–68.
40.
WainwrightJ (2005) Politics of nature: A review of three recent works by Bruno Latour. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism16: 115–20.
41.
WarrenM (1992) Democratic theory and self-transformation. American Political Science Review86(1): 8–23.
42.
WebbD (2011) The limits of associative democracy: A comment on an actor-relational approach in planning. Planning Theory00: 1–10 (accessed 20 November 2010).