Change, planned and unplanned, can be the product of events (change by chance), new language (change from societal interaction), and practices (track-bound change), and can involve many different societal actors. To position planning as an activity within this broader context, we present a model that captures the interplay between these three sources of change, leading to a typology of change-inducing phenomena. Change, consequently, can be managed in an active and effective way rather than being viewed as an environment of fuzzy conditions and unpredictable dynamics. Our model may be helpful to planners, as an analytic tool, usable in educational curricula as well as in the practice of planning.
AndersenE (2003) Be prepared for the unforeseen. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management11(3): 129–31.
3.
BennisWGBenneKDChinR (eds) (1961) The Planning of Change. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
4.
BooherDEInnesJE, (2006) Complexity and adaptive policy systems: CALFED as an emergent form of governance for sustainable management of contested resources. Proceedings from the 50th Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Science (ISSS), July, 2006.
5.
BurnesB (2005) Complexity theories and organizational change. The International Journal of Management Reviews7(2): 73–90.
6.
CastellsM (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
7.
CastellsM (2007) Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication1(2007): 238–66.
8.
CheneyGChristensenLT (2001) Organizational identity, linkages between internal and external communication. In: JablinFMPutnamLL (eds) The New Handbook of Organizational Communication; Advances in Theory, Research and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 231–69.
9.
CobbRWElderCD (1983) Participation in American Policies; The Dynamics of Agenda-Building. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
10.
ColemanPT (2006) Conflict, complexity, and change: A meta-framework for addressing protracted, intractable conflicts—III. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology12(4): 325–48.
11.
CsikszentmihalyiM (1996) Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Perennial.
12.
DeWulfAGrayBPutnamLAartsNLewickiRBouwenRvan Woerkum (2009) Disentangle approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations62(2): 155–93.
13.
DijksterhuisA (2004) Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology87(5): 586–98.
14.
DörnerD (1996) The Logic of Failure. New York: Metropolitan Books.
15.
FordJD (1999) Organisational change as shifting conversations. Journal of Organisational Change12(6): 480–500.
16.
FordJDFordLWMcNamaraRT (2001) Resistance and the background conversations of change. Journal of Organizational Change15(2): 105–121.
17.
ForesterJF (2001) The deliberate practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
FriedmanALMilesS (2006) Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
GilchristA (2000) The well-connected community: Networking to the ‘edge of chaos’Community Development Journal35(3): 264–75.
20.
GladwellM (2001) The Tipping Point: How Little Things can Make a Big Difference. Boston, MA: Little Brown & Company.
21.
GranovetterM (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–80.
22.
GunderM (2008) Ideologies of certainty in a risky reality: Beyond the hauntology of planning. Planning theory7(2): 186–206.
23.
HochCJ (2007) Pragmatic communicative action theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research26(3): 272–83.
24.
HollingCS (ed.) (1978) Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
25.
HollingCS (1995) What barriers? What bridges? In: GundersonLHHollingCSLightSS (eds) Barriers and Bridges: To the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. New York: Columbia University Press, 5–34.
26.
IsrazábalC (2009) Realizing planning’s emancipatory promise: Learning from regime theory to strengthen communicative action. Planning Theory8(2): 115–139.
27.
JarzabkowskiP (2005) Strategy as Practice; An Activity Based Approach. London: Sage.
28.
KingdonJW (1984) Agendas, Policies and Public Choices. New York: Harper Collins.
29.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
MaarleveldM (2003) Social Environmental Learning for Sustainable Natural Resource Management. Dissertation. Wageningen University, Wageningen.
31.
MertonRK (1957) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
32.
MintzbergH (1994) The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning: Reconceiving Roles for Planning, Plans, Planners. New York: The Free Press.
33.
MontuoriAPurserRE (eds) (1999) Social Creativity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
34.
MorganG (1998) Images of Organization, The Executive Edition. London: Sage.
35.
MumbyDK, (2001) Power and politics. In: JablinFMPutnamLL (eds.) The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 585–623.
36.
PepperGL (1995) Communicating in Organizations: A cultural approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
37.
PortugaliJ (2008) Learning from paradoxes about prediction and planning in self-organizing cities. Planning Theory7(3): 248–62.
38.
QvortrupL, (2006) Understanding new digital media: Medium theory or complexity theory?European Journal of Communication21(3): 345–56.
39.
RittelHWJWebberM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences4: 155–69.
40.
RogersEMMedinaUERiveraMAWileyCH (2005) Complex adaptive systems and the diffusion of innovations. The Innovation Journal: The Public Dector Innovation Journal10(3): article 30, 1–26.
41.
SandercockL (1998) The death of modernist planning: Radical praxis for a postmodern age. In: DouglassMFriedmannJ (eds) Cities for Citizens: Planning and The Rise of Civil Society in a Global Age. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
42.
SchefferM (2009) Critical Transitions in Nature and Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
43.
SchönDA (1983) The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
44.
StaceyRDGriffinDShawP (2000) Complexity and Management; Fad or Challenge to Systems Thinking?London: Routledge.
45.
‘tHartPKleiboerM (1995) Policy controversies in the negotiatory state. Knowledge and Policy8(4): 5–25.
46.
TimmermansJ (2004) Purposive Interaction in Multi-Actor Decision Making. Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon Academic Publishers.
47.
UrryJ (2004) The ‘System’ of Automobility. Theory, Culture and Society21: 25–39.
48.
Van BuerenEMKlijnEHKoppenjanJFM (2003) Dealing with wicked problems in networks: Analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory13(2): 193–212.
49.
Van GinnekenJ (2003) Collective Behavior and Public Opinion; Rapid Shifts in Opinion and Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
Van HerzeleA (2006) A forest for each city and town: Story lines in the policy debate for urban forests in Flanders. Urban Studies43(3): 673–96.
51.
Van LieshoutMAartsN (2008) ‘Outside is where it is at!’ Youth and immigrants’ perspectives on public space. Space and Culture11(4): 497–513.
52.
Van WoerkumCMJ (2003) orality and external communication. Documents Design4(2): 104–12.
53.
Van WoerkumCAartsN (2008) The orientation of organizations to their environments: The functions of the unconscious mind. The Journal of Public Relations Research20(2): 180–206.
54.
Van WoerkumCMJAartsMNC (2008) Staying connected: The communication between organizations and their environment. Corporate Communications: An International Journal13(2):197–211.
55.
Van WoerkumCMJAartsMNCde GripK (2007) Creativity, planning and organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management20(6): 847–65.
56.
WalsAEJ (ed.) (2007) Social Learning Towards a Sustainable World. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
