This article uses cosmopolitanism as a theoretical lens to explore both the urbanism and the ethics of planning in Kabul. The Cosmopolis arguments of Sandercock is synthesized with the political argument of Mouffe to articulate a concept of agonistic cosmopolitanism in contrast to a concept of globalizing cosmopolitanism. The practices that shape urban life in Kabul resemble what Simone describes as worlding processes in cities of sub-Saharan Africa. Under such adverse conditions, Kabulis demonstrate vital aspects of agonistic pluralism. Conversely, a transnational community in Kabul embodies a less critical, presumptively global cosmopolitanism through the production of a Global Village that encourages socially disruptive land speculation. The value of a more critical, agonistic understanding is then demonstrated through the analysis of an unexpected discrepancy in planning ideals between the national and local planning agencies in Kabul. This analysis suggests a new ethical task for urban planners: to challenge geopolitical empire through a cosmopolitan ethic that embraces the substantive conflicts which come with actual recognition and political inclusion of the Other.
Agency Coordinating Body for Afghan Relief [ACBAR] ( 2002) Concerns related to housing rents in Afghanistan . Kabul: Open Letter to the Minister of Finance.
2.
Arez, GhJ, Dittmann A. ( 2005) Kabul: Aspects of Urban Geography. Peshawar.
3.
Bauer C. ( 1934) Modern Housing. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
4.
Bearak B. ( 2002) Kabul Journal: In the Afghan capital, rents go through the roof. New York Times, 14 May.
5.
Benard C. ( 2002) Veiled Courage: Inside the Afghan Women’s Resistance . New York: Broadway Books.
6.
Berman M. ( 1988) All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity . New York: Viking Penguin.
7.
Bourdieu P. ( 1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Castells M. ( 1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
9.
Chatterjee P. ( 1986) Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: a Derivative Discourse?Totowa, NJ: Zed Books .
10.
Coll S. ( 2004) Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001. New York: Penguin Press.
11.
Dastagir G.h (2007) Presentation to fifth-year architecture students of Kabul University. Kabul: Municipal Plan Making Office (Daftar-e PlanSaziye Sharwaliye Kabul).
12.
Davidoff P. ( 1965) Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners31(4): 331-338.
13.
Erlanger S. ( 2001) A nation challenged: After the Taliban; after arm-twisting, Afghan factions pick interim government and leader. The New York Times, 6 December.
14.
Ferguson J., Gupta AJ ( 2002) Spatializing states: Toward an ethnography of neoliberal governmentality. American Ethnologist29(4): 981-1002.
15.
Forbes A. ( 1892) The Afghan Wars, 1839-42 and 1878-80. New York: C. Scribner.
16.
Foucault M. ( 1991) Governmentality. In Graham B, Gordon C, Miller P (eds) The Foucault Effect. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press , 87-104.
17.
French RA, Hamilton FEI ( 1979) The Socialist City: Spatial Structure and Urban Policy . New York: Wiley.
18.
Glacken CJ ( 1967) Traces on the Rhodian Shore: Nature and Culture in Western Thought from Ancient Times to the End of the Eighteenth Century . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
19.
Graham S., Marvin S. ( 2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities, and the Urban Condition. New York: Routledge.
20.
Gregorian V. ( 1969) The Emergence of Modern Afghanistan; Politics of Reform and Modernization, 1880-1946. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
Gregory D. ( 2004) The Colonial Present: Afghanistan, Palestine, Iraq . Malden, MA: Blackwell.
22.
Hardt M., Negri M. ( 2000) Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Hillier J. ( 2003) Agon’izing over consensus: why Habermasian ideals cannot be ‘real’. Planning Theory2(1): 37-59.
24.
Holston J. ( 1989) The Modernist City: an Anthropological Critique of Brasília . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Human Rights Watch (2005) Blood-stained Hands: Past Atrocities in Kabul and Afghanistan’s Legacy of Impunity . New York: Human Rights Watch .
26.
Isard W. ( 1956) Location and Space-economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
Keck M., Sikkink K. ( 1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28.
Krogius V. ( 1989) The management of town planning processes in the USSR . In Whitehead P (ed.) Soviet Planning Int He 1980s: a Collection of Original Planning Papers from the Soviet Union. Berwick-on-Tweed: How & Blackhall, 9-15.
29.
Laërtius D.1925. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Trans RD Hicks. London: Heinemann.
30.
Messick B. ( 1993) The Calligraphic State: Textual Domination and History in a Muslim Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
31.
Mitchell T. ( 1991) Colonising Egypt. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
32.
Mottahedeh R. ( 1985) The Mantle of the Prophet: Religion and Politics in Iran . New York: Simon and Schuster .
33.
Mouffe C. ( 1993) The Return of the Political. London : Verso.
34.
Nawid SK ( 1999) Religious Response to Social Change in Afghanistan, 1919-29: King Aman-Allah and the Afghan Ulama. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda.
35.
Nussbaum M. ( 1997) Kant and stoic cosmopolitanism. Journal of Political Philosophy5(1): 1-25.
36.
Ong A. ( 2006) Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
37.
Pongsawat P. ( 2007) Border partial citizenship, border towns, and Thai-Myanmar cross-border development: Case studies at the Thai border towns. PhD Thesis . Berkeley, CA: University of California .
38.
Rashid A. ( 2000) Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil, and Fundamentalism in Central Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39.
Robinson J. ( 2002) Global and world cities: A view from off the map . International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26(3): 531-554.
40.
Roy A. ( 2009) Why India cannot plan its cities. Planning Theory8(1); 76-87.
41.
Sandercock L. ( 1998) Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities . New York: John Wiley.
42.
Sandercock L., Lyssiotis P. ( 2003) Cosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities of the 21st Century . New York: Continuum.
43.
Saxenian A. ( 1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley And Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Simone A. ( 2001) On the worlding of African cities. African Studies Review44(2): 15-41.
45.
Singerman D., Amar P. ( 2006) Cairo Cosmopolitan: Politics, Culture, and Urban Space in the New Globalized Middle East. The American University in Cairo Press.
46.
Smith N. ( 2002) New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode34(3): 427-450.
47.
Turton D., Marsden P. ( 2002) Taking Refugees For a Ride? the Politics of Refugee Return to Afghanistan. Kabul: Afghanistan Research Evaluation Unit.
48.
Wild R. ( 1932) Amanullah: Ex-King of Afghanistan. Quetta: Nisa traders.
49.
Yiftachel O. ( 2006) Ethnocracy: Land and Identity Politics in Israel/Palestine . Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
50.
Yiftachel O. ( 2008) Theoretical notes on ‘gray cities’: the coming of urban apartheid? Planning Theory8(1): 88-100.
