This article informs communicative action theory with insights from urban regime theory. The synthesis proposes a model of planning that is more comprehensive in its treatment of the linkages between planning and governance and helps advance the creation of network power, emancipatory knowledge, empowering subjectivities, and spaces of solidarity. The article then discusses the merits of these insights in the context of a categorization of planning into traditional, democratic, advocacy, and incremental approaches.
Allmendinger, P. (2002) `Towards a Post-Positivist Typology of Planning Theory', Planning Theory1(1): 77-99.
2.
Bacon, F. (1597) Religious Meditations, Of Heresies.
3.
Banfield, E. (1961) Political Influence. New York : Free Press.
4.
Bhabha, H.K. (1986) `The Other Question: Difference, Discrimination and the Discourse of Colonialism', in Literature, Politics and Theory: Papers for the Essex Conference 1976-1984. London: New Accents, Methuen.
5.
Booher, D. and Innes, J. (2002) `Network Power in Collaborative Planning', Journal of Planning Education and Research21(3): 221-36.
6.
Butler, J. (1997) The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
Campbell, S. and Fainstein, S. (eds) (1996) Readings in Planning Theory . Oxford: Blackwell.
8.
Castells, M. (1996) The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture: The Rise of the Network Society, Vol. 1Malden, MA: Blackwell.
9.
Castells, M. (1997) The Power of Identity. Vol. 2 of The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
10.
Cox, K. (1997) `Governance, Urban Regime Analysis, and the Politics of Local Economic Development', in M. Lauria (ed.) Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy, pp. 99-121. London: SAGE.
11.
Cranton, P. and Cohen, L.R. (2000) `Spirals of Learning', The National Teaching & Learning Forum9(5), available online at: [http://cstl.syr.edu/Cstl/NTLF/V9n5/research.htm], accessed 24 February 2005.
12.
Dahl, R. (1961) Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
Davies, J. (2001) Partnerships and Regimes: The Politics of Urban Regeneration in the UK. Aldershot: Ashgate.
14.
Davies, J. (2002) `Urban Regime Theory: A Normative-Empirical Critique' , Journal of Urban Affairs24(1): 1-17.
15.
DeLeon, R. (1992) Left Coast City: Progressive Politics in San Francisco, 1975-1991. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
16.
DiGaetano, A. and Klemanski, J. (1999) Power and City Governance: Comparative Perspectives on Urban Development. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17.
Dryzek, J. (1987) Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy . New York: Basil Blackwell.
18.
Elkin, S. (1987) City and Regime in the American Republic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Encarta World English Dictionary (1999) Microsoft Corporation. Developed for Microsoft byBloomsbury Publishing Plc.
20.
Fainstein, S. (2000) `New Directions in Planning Theory', Urban Affairs Review35(4): 451-78.
21.
Fainstein, S. and Fainstein, N. (1996) `City Planning and Political Values: An Updated View', in S. Campbell and S. Fainstein (eds) Readings in Planning Theory , pp. 265-87. Oxford: Blackwell.
22.
Feldman, M. (1997) `Can We Talk? Interpreting Planning Theory as Comedy' , Planning Theory17: 43-64.
23.
Flyvbjerg, B. (1998) Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice, Morality, and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Foley, J. and Lauria, M. (2000) `Plans, Planning and Tragic Choices', Planning Theory and Practice1(2): 219-33.
25.
Forester, J. (1980) `Critical Theory and Planning Practice', Journal of the American Planning Association46(3): 275-86.
26.
Forester, J. (1989) Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
Forester, J. (1993) Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice: Toward a Critical Pragmatism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
28.
Forester, J. (1993) `Learning from Practice Stories: The Priority of Practical Judgment', in F. Fischer and J. Forester (eds) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, pp. 186-209. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
29.
Forester, J. (1999a) `Dealing with Deep Value Differences', in L. Susskind, S. McKearnan and J. Thomas-Larner (eds) The Consensus Building Handbook, pp. 463-93. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
Forester, J. (1999b) The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, trans. and ed. C. Gordon.New York: Pantheon Books.
32.
Friedmann, J. (1987) Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
Giddens, A. (1985) `Jurgen Habermas', in Q. Skinner (ed.) The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences, pp. 121-39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Godschalk, D.R. (1992) `Negotiating Intergovernmental Development Policy Conflicts: Practice Based Guidelines', American Planning Association Summer, pp. 368-78.
35.
Gregory, D. (2000) `Critical Theory', in R.J. Johnson, D. Gregory, G. Pratt and M. Watts (eds) The Dictionary of Human Geography, pp. 129-33. Oxford : Blackwell.
36.
Gunder, M. (2003) `Planning Policy Formulation from a Lacanian Perspective' , International Planning Studies8(4): 279-94.
37.
Habermas, J. (1971) Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
38.
Habermas, J. (1981) Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Vol. 1 of The Theory of Communicative Action, trans. T. McCarthy. Boston, MA: Bacon.
39.
Habermas, J. (1996) `Dogmatism, Reason and Decision: On Theory and Praxis in Our Scientific Civilization', in W. Quthwaite (ed.) The Habermas Reader, p. 90. Cambridge: Polity Press.
40.
Haraway, D.J. (1991) `Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective', in Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: the Reinvention of Nature, pp. 183-201. New York: Routledge.
41.
Harper, T. and Stein, S. (2006) Dialogic Planning in a Fragmented Society. New Brunswick, NJ: CUPR Press.
42.
Healey, P. (1996) `Planning Through Debate: The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory', in S. Campbell and S. Feinstein (eds) Readings in Planning Theory, pp. 234-57. Oxford: Blackwell.
43.
Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Vancouver: UBC Press .
44.
Healey, P. (1999) `Institutional Analysis, Communicative Planning, and Shaping Places', Journal of Planning Education and Research19(2): 111-21.
45.
Hillier, J. (2003) `Agonizing over Consensus: Why Habermasian Ideals Cannot Be "Real"', Planning Theory2(1): 37-59.
46.
Hoch, C. (1996) `A Pragmatic Inquiry about Planning and Power' , in S. Mandelbaum, L. Mazza, and R. Burchell (eds) Explorations in Planning Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Public Policy.
47.
Hollingshead, A. (1949) Elmtown's Youth. New York: Wiley.
48.
Howard, C., Lipsky, M. and Rogers, D. (1998) `Citizen Participation in Urban Politics: Rise and Routinization', in D. Judd and P. Kantor (eds) The Politics of Urban America: A Reader, pp. 154-99. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
49.
Hunter, F. (1953) Community Power Structure: A Study of Decision Makers. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
50.
Huxley, M. and Yiftachel, O. (2000) `New Paradigm or Old Myopia? Unsettling the Communicative Turn in Planning Theory', Journal of Planning Education and Research19(4): 333-42.
51.
Innes, J. (1992) `Group Processes and the Social Construction of Growth Management: Florida, Vermont, and New Jersey', American Planning Association Journal Autumn, 440-53.
52.
Innes, J. (1995) `Planning Theory's Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice', Journal of Planning Education and Research14(3): 183-91.
53.
Innes, J. (2004) `Consensus Building: Clarifications for the Critics' , Planning Theory3(1): 5-20.
54.
Innes, J. and Booher, D. (1999) `Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems: A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning', Journal of the American Planning Association65(4): 412-23.
55.
Innes, J. and Booher, D. (2000) `Public Participation in Planning: New Strategies for the 21st Century', Working Paper 2000-07, Institute of Urban and Regional Planning, University of California at Berkeley.
56.
Innes, J. and Gruber, J. (2005) `Planning Styles in Conflict: The Metropolitan Transportation Commission', Journal of Planning Education and Research71(2): 177-88.
57.
Irazábal, C. (2005) City Making and Urban Governance in the Americas: Curitiba and Portland. Aldershot: Ashgate.
58.
Irazábal, C. (2007) `Kitsch is Dead, Long Live Kitsch: The Production of Hyperkitsch in Las Vegas', Journal of Architectural and Planning Research24(3): 199-223.
59.
Irazábal, C. (ed.) (2008) Ordinary Places, Extraordinary Events: Citizenship, Democracy, and Public Space in Latin America. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
60.
Irazábal, C. (2009) `Cultivating Just Planning and Legal Institutions: A Critical Assessment of the South Central Farm in Los Angeles', Journal of Urban Affairs31(1): 1-23.
61.
Irazábal, C. and Neville, J. (2007) `Neighborhoods in the Lead: Grassroots Planning for Social Transformation in Post-Katrina New Orleans?', Planning Practice and Research22(2): 131-53.
62.
Kirby, K. (1996) Indifferent Boundaries: Spatial Concepts of Human Subjectivity. New York: Guilford .
63.
Lauria, M. (ed.) (1997a) Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy. London: SAGE.
64.
Lauria, M. (1997b) `Introduction: Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory' , in Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy, pp. 1-9. London: SAGE.
65.
Lauria, M. and Whelan, R.K. (1995) `Planning Theory and Political Economy: The Need for a Reintegration', Planning Theory14: 8-33.
66.
Leo, C. (1997) `City Politics in an Era of Globalization', in M. Lauria (ed.) Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy, pp. 77-98. London: SAGE.
67.
Logan, J. and Molotch, H. (1987) Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place . Berkeley: University of California Press.
68.
Longan, M. and Oakes, T. (2002) `Geography's Conquest of History', in R. Kitchin and J. Kneal (eds) Lost in Space: Geographies of Science Fiction, pp. 39-56. London: Continuum, available online at: [http://spot.colorado.edu/~toakes/Diamond.html].
69.
MacCannell, D. (1992) Empty Meeting Grounds. London : Routledge.
70.
Margerum, R.D. (2002) `Collaborative Planning: Building Consensus and Building a Distinct Model for Practice', Journal of Planning Education and Research21(3): 237-53.
71.
McGuirk, P. (2001) `Situating Communicative Planning Theory: Context, Power, and Knowledge', Environment and Planning A33: 195-217.
72.
Mills, C.W. (1959) The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
73.
Mossberger, K. and Stoker, G. (2001) `The Evolution of Urban Regime Theory: The Challenge of Conceptualization', Urban Affairs Review36(6): 810-35.
74.
Oakes, T. (2005) `Tourism and the Modern Subject: Placing the Encounter between Tourist and Other', in C. Cartier and A. Lew (eds) Seductions of Place, pp. 36-55. London: Routledge.
75.
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
76.
Pierre, J. (1999) `Models of Urban Governance: The Institutional Dimension of Urban Politics', Urban Affairs Review34(3): 372-96.
77.
Pile, S. and Thrift, N. (1995) Mapping the Subject: Geographies of Cultural Transformation . London: Routledge.
78.
Rast, J. (2006) `Governing the Regimeless City: The Frank Zeidler Administration in Milwaukee, 1948-1960', Urban Affairs Review42(1): 81-112.
79.
Rittel, H. and Webber, M.M. (1984) `Planning Problems are Wicked Problems', in N. Cross (ed.) Developments in Design Methodology, pp. 135-44. New York: Wiley.
80.
Rose, G. (1999) `Performing Space', in D. Massey, J. Allan and P. Sarre (eds) Human Geography Today, pp. 247-59. Cambridge: Polity Press.
81.
Roy, A. (2001) `A "Public" Muse: On Planning Convictions and Feminist Contentions', Journal of Planning Education and Research21(2): 109-26.
82.
Sager, T. (1993) `Paradigms for Planning: A Rationality-Based Classification' , Planning Theory9: 79.
83.
Sager, T. (1994) Communicative Planning Theory. Aldershot: Avebury.
84.
Sager, T. (2002) `Deliberative Planning and Decision Making: An Impossibility Result', Journal of Planning Education and Research21(4): 367-78.
85.
Sandercock, L. (2003) Cosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities of the 21st Century . London: Continuum.
86.
Savitch, H.V. (1988) Post-industrial Cities: Politics and Planning in New York, Paris and London. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
87.
Savitch, H.V. and Clayton Thomas, J. (1991a) `Conclusion: End of the Millennium Big City Politics', in H.V. Savitch and J. Clayton Thomas (eds) Big City Politics in Transition, pp. 235-51. Newbury Park, CA : SAGE.
88.
Savitch, H.V. and Clayton Thomas, J. (1991b) `Introduction: Big City Politics, Then and Now', in H.V. Savitch and J. Clayton Thomas (eds) Big City Politics in Transition, pp. 1-13. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
89.
Schmitter, R. (1977) Comparative Political Studies. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
90.
Sedgwick, P. (2002) `Subjectivity', in A. Edgar and P. Sedgwick (eds) Cultural Theory: The Key Concepts, p. 389. London: Routledge.
91.
Sim, S. (ed.) (1999) The Routledge Critical Dictionary of Postmodern Thought. New York: Routledge.
92.
Sites, W. (1997) `The Limits of Urban Regime Theory: New York City under Koch, Dinkins, and Giuliani', Urban Affairs Review32(4): 536-57.
93.
Stoker, G. (1995) `Regime Theory and Urban Politics', in D. Judge, G. Stoker and H. Wolman (eds) Theories of Urban Politics, pp. 54-71. London: SAGE.
94.
Stone, C. (1989) Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
95.
Stone, C. (1998) `Urban Regimes: A Research Perspective', in D. Judd and P. Kantor (eds) The Politics of Urban America: A Reader , pp. 24-39. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
96.
Stone, C. and Sanders, H. (eds) (1987) The Politics of Urban Development . Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
97.
Stone, C., Henig, J., Jones, B. and Pierannunzi, C. (2001) Building Civic Capacity: The Politics of Reforming Urban Schools. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
98.
Tewdwr-Jones, M. and Allmendinger, P. (1998) `Deconstructing Communicative Rationality: A Critique of Habermasian Collaborative Planning', Environment and Planning A30(11): 1975-89.
99.
Tewdwr-Jones, M. and Thomas, H. (1998) `Collaborative Action in Local Plan-making: Planners' Perceptions of "Planning through Debate"', Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design25: 127-44.
100.
Touraine, A. (1995) Critique of Modernity, trans. D. Macey. Oxford: Blackwell.
101.
Touraine, A. (1997) What is Democracy?Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
102.
Verma, N. and Shin, H. (2004) `Communicative Action and the Network Society: A Pragmatic Marriage?', Journal of Planning Education and Research24: 131-40.
103.
Verma, N. and Shin, H. (forthcoming) `Communicative Rationality, Marx, and the Pragmatists: A Revisionist Reading', Planning Theory.
104.
Ward, K. (1997) `Rigourising Regime Theory', in J. Stanyer and G. Stoker (eds) Contemporary Political Studies, pp. 181-97. Belfast : Political Studies Association.
105.
Watson, V. (2002) `Do We Learn from Planning Practice? The Contribution of the Practice Movement to Planning Theory', Journal of Planning Education and Research22: 178-87.
106.
Whelan, R.K., Young, A.H. and Lauria, M. (1994) `Urban Regimes and Racial Politics in New Orleans' , Journal of Urban Affairs16(1): 1-21.
107.
Yates, D. (1977) The Ungovernable City: The Politics of Urban Problems and Policy Making. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
108.
Yiftachel, O. and Huxley, M. (2000) `On Space, Planning and Communication: A Brief Rejoinder', International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24(4): 922-4.
109.
Yiftachel, O. and Huxley, M. (2001) `Debating Dominance and Relevance: Notes of the "Communicative Turn" in Planning Theory', Journal of International and Regional Research24(4): 907-23.
110.
Young, I.M. (2000) Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
