Mandelbaum argued against the possibility of a complete general theory of planning
set out along the lines of a generalist, a priori, covering-law model. In this
article we draw on Miller and Hurley to elaborate a coherentist approach to planning
theories that achieves some of the aspirations Mandelbaum sought for a general
theory. We argue that this perspective is more inclusive, vis-à-vis what
can count as theory for planning, and widens the circle of intellectual
conversations in which productive disagreements on points of theory can be
sustained. We show how the coherentist approach is useful in focusing the attention
of planning theorists on productive inquiry. Finally, by analogy, we argue that a
coherentist attitude toward how plans can and should be made and used in particular
situations is more useful than the traditional approach of comprehensive plans.
Alexander, E. R.
(1995) How Organizations Act Together: Interorganizational
Coordination in Theory and Practice.
New York: Gordon and Breach
.
2.
Allmendinger, P.
(2002) Planning Theory.
Houndmills: Palgrave
.
3.
Altshuler, A.
(1965) The City Planning Process.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
4.
Apel, K. O.
(1984) Explanation and Understanding.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
5.
Arrow, K.
(1951) Social Choice and Individual Values.
New York: Wiley
.
6.
Barzel, Y.
(1989) Economic Analysis of Property Rights.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
7.
Berke, P. R.
,
Godschalk, D. R.
,
Kaiser, E. J.
and
Rodriguez, D. A.
(2006) Urban Land Use Planning.
Urbana: University of Illinois Press
.
8.
Berlin, I.
(1969) Four Essays on Liberty.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
9.
Broome, J.
(1991) Weighing Goods.
Oxford: Blackwell.
10.
Bunnell, G.
(2002) Making Places Special: Stories of Real Places Made
Better by Planning.
Chicago, IL: Planners Press/American Planning Association
.
11.
Burby, R. J.
,
May, P. J.
,
Berke, P. R.
,
Dalton, L. C.et al.
(1997) Making Governments Plan: State Experiments in Managing
Land Use.
Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press
.
12.
Checkoway, B.
(1986) Strategic Perspective on Planning Practice.
Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
.
13.
Dahl, R. A.
and
Lindblom, C. E.
(1953) Politics, Economics, and Welfare.
New York: Harper and Row
.
14.
Daniels, N.
(1979)
‘Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics’
, Journal of Philosophy76:
256-282
.
15.
Davidoff, P.
(1965)
‘Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning’
, Journal of the American Institute of Planners31(4):
331-338
.
16.
Davidson, D.
(1984) Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
17.
Davidson, D.
(2001) Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
18.
Davidson, D.
(2004) Problems of Rationality.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
19.
Diamond, J.
(1997) Guns, Germs, and Steel.
New York: W.W. Norton
.
20.
Flyvbjerg, B.
(1998) Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
21.
Flyvbjerg, B.
(2001) Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails
and How it Can Succeed Again.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
22.
Forester, J.
(1999) The Deliberative Practitioner.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
23.
Friend, J. K.
and
Jessop, W. N.
(1969) Local Government and Strategic Choice: An Operational
Research Approach to the Processes of Public Planning.
London: Tavistock
.
24.
Harper, T. L.
and
Stein, S. M.
(1995)
‘Out of the Post-Modern Abyss: Preserving the Rationale for
Liberal Planning’
, Journal of Planning Education and Research14(4):
233-244
.
25.
Harwood, S. A.
(2003)
‘Environmental Justice on the Streets: Advocacy Planning as a
Tool to Contest Environmental Racism’
, Journal of Planning Education and Research23(1):
24-38
.
26.
Hoch, C.
(1994) What Planners Do: Power, Politics, and
Persuasion.
Chicago, IL: Planners Press/American Planning Association
.
27.
Hopkins, L. D.
(2001a)
‘Planning as Science: Engaging Disagreement’
, Journal of Planning Education and Research20(4):
399-406
.
28.
Hopkins, L. D.
(2001b) ‘Should Additional Land Be Serviced for
Urban Development? When? Where? How Much?’, in
G. J. Knaap
(ed.) Land Supply and Infrastructure Monitoring for Smart Urban
Growth, pp. 139-163.
Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
.
29.
Hopkins, L. D.
(2001c) Urban Development: The Logic of Making Plans.
Washington, DC: Island Press
.
30.
Horwitt, S. D.
(1989) Let Them Call Me Rebel: Saul Alinsky - His Life and
Legacy.
New York: Alfred A. Knopf
.
31.
Hurley, S. L.
(1989) Natural Reasons: Personality and Polity.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
32.
Innes, J. E.
(1996)
‘Planning through Consensus Building: A New View of the
Comprehensive Planning Ideal’
, Journal of the American Planning Association62(4):
460-472
.
33.
Kaiser, E. J.
,
Godschalk, D. R.
and
Chapin, F. S. J.
(1995) Urban Land Use Planning.
Urbana: University of Illinois Press
.
34.
Kelly, E. D.
and
Becker, B.
(2000) Community Planning: An Introduction to the
Comprehensive Plan.
Washington, DC: Island Press
.
35.
Kitcher, P.
(2001) Science, Truth, and Democracy.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
36.
McClendon, B. W.
(2003)
‘A Bold Vision and Brand Identity for the Planning Profession’
, Journal of the American Planning Association69(3):
221-229
.
37.
Mandelbaum, S. J.
(1979)
‘A Complete General Theory of Planning is Impossible’
, Policy Sciences11:
59-71
.
38.
Mandelbaum, S. J.
(1990)
‘Reading Plans’
, Journal of the American Planning Association56(3):
350-356
.
39.
Mandelbaum, S. J.
(2000) Open Moral Communities.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
40.
Miller, R. W.
(1987) Fact and Method: Explanation, Confirmation and Reality
in the Natural and the Social Sciences.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
41.
Miller, R. W.
(1992) Moral Differences.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
42.
Murdoch, I.
(1970) The Sovereignty of the Good.
London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
.
43.
Neuman, M.
(1998)
‘Does Planning Need the Plan?’
, Journal of the American Planning Association64(2):
208-220
.
44.
Nussbaum, M.
(1993) ‘Non-Relative Virtues: An Aristotelian
Approach’, in
M. Nussbaum
and
A. Sen
(eds) The Quality of Life, pp. 242-269.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
45.
Putnam, H.
(2002) The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other
Essays.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
46.
Reardon, K. M.
(1998)
‘Enhancing the Capacity of Community-Based Organizations in East
St. Louis’
, Journal of Planning Education and Research17(4):
323-333
.
47.
Rorty, R.
(1986) ‘Pragmatism, Davidson, and the
Truth’, in
E. LePore
(ed.) Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald
Davidson, pp. 333-355.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
48.
Sandercock, L.
(2004)
‘Towards a Planning Imagination for the 21st Century’
, Journal of the American Planning Association70(2):
133-141
.
49.
Stein, S. M.
and
Harper, T. L.
(1997)
‘Pragmatic Incrementalist Planning in Post-Modern Society: A
Normative Justification’
, Planning Theory18:
3-28
.
50.
Toulmin, S.
(1992) Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
51.
Webster, C.
and
Lai, L. W.-C.
(2003) Property Rights, Planning, and Markets.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
.
52.
Wildavsky, A.
(1973)
‘If Planning is Everything, Maybe It’s Nothing’
, Policy Sciences4(2):
137-153
.
53.
Wittgenstein, L.
(1958) Philosophical Investigations.
New York: Macmillan
.
54.
Woolcock, M.
(2004)
‘Why and How Planners Should Take Social Capital Seriously’
, Journal of American Planning Association70(2):
183-189
.
