Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Interval number multi-attribute evaluation and decision-making methods of organizational quality-specific immunity of digital technology start-ups based on martin System-TOPSIS
In this paper, we take the organizational quality-specific immunity of digital technology start-ups as the starting point, and comprehensively use the martin system-TOPSIS research method to evaluate the organizational quality-specific immunity status of digital technology start-ups. The empirical results show that the martin system-TOPSIS method can effectively solve the evaluation and decision-making problem of organizational quality-specific immunity of digital technology start-ups, and the interval number multi-attribute evaluation and decision-making method based on martin system-TOPSIS is effective and feasible in solving the problem of organizational quality-specific immunity evaluation and decision-making of digital technology start-ups.
SchweizerRLagerströmK. “Wag the Dog” initiatives and the corporate immune system. Multinatl Bus Rev2019; 28(1): 109–127.
2.
LiuQSunHYHeY. Bilateral matching decision making of partners of manufacturing enterprises based on BMIHFIBPT integration methods: evaluation criteria of organizational quality-specific immunity. Processes2023; 11(3): 709.
3.
LiuQLianZFGuoY. Empirical analysis of organizational quality defect management enabling factors identification based on SMT, interval-valued hesitant fuzzy set ELECTRE and QRA methods. J Intell Fuzzy Syst2020; 38(6): 7595–7608.
4.
LiuQHuHYGuoY. Organizational quality specific immune maturity evaluation based on continuous interval number medium operator. Symmetry-Basel2020; 12(6): 918.
5.
LiuQLianZFGuoY, et al.Heuristic decision of planned shop visit products based on similar reasoning method: from the perspective of organizational quality-specific immune. Open Phys2020; 18(1): 126–138.
6.
LiuQLianZFGuoY, et al.Intuitively fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making of organizational quality specificity immune evolution ability based on evidential reasoning. J Intell Fuzzy Syst2020; 38(6): 7609–7622.
7.
LiuQHuHYGuoY, et al.Evaluation and decision making of organizational quality specific immunity based on MGDM-IPLAO method. Open Phys2019; 17(1): 863–870.
8.
YangXGuoYLiuQ, et al.Empirical evaluation on the effect of enterprise quality immune response based on EMIBSGTD-TAS. J Intell Fuzzy Syst2021; 40(6): 11587–11606.
9.
LiuQDingTMLiYF, et al.Function mechanism of intellectual property capability on relay innovation based on CWLBGSO-DAG-Bootstrap SEM: mediating effect of knowledge matching and moderating effect of relationship learning. Comput Intell Neurosci2022; 2022: 4357917.
10.
LiuQTongYQZhaoDY. Empirical analysis of organization quality-specific immune evolution of intelligent manufacturing enterprises based on self-organization methods. Comput Intell Neurosci2022; 2022: 6354820.
11.
YangXGuoYLiuQ, et al.Dynamic Co-evolution analysis of low-carbon technology innovation compound system of new energy enterprise based on the perspective of sustainable development. J Clean Prod2022; 349: 131330.
12.
ZhangCXWangCLiuCH, et al.Data-driven sustainability evaluation of machining system: a case study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2021; 117(3-4): 775–784.
13.
LiuCHGaoMDZhuG, et al.Data driven eco-efficiency evaluation and optimization in industrial production. Inside Energy2021; 224: 120170.
14.
LiuCHChenJWangXQ. Quantitative evaluation model of the quality of remanufactured product. IEEE Trans Eng Manag2024; 71: 7413–7424.
15.
LiuCHChenJCaiW. Data-driven remanufacturability evaluation method of waste parts. IEEE Trans Ind Inf2022; 18(7): 4587–4595.
16.
MaoHYWangWBLiuCH, et al.Effects of the carbon emission quota policy on the quality and sales of manufactured and remanufactured products. Int J Prod Econ2023; 266: 109058.
17.
LyuYWWangZZhangJN. Does capital market opening promote enterprise green innovation? Evidence from Shanghai-Hong Kong stock connect and Shenzhen-Hong Kong stock connect. Technol Econ Dev Econ2023; 29(5): 1432–1460.
18.
FangXBLiuMTLiGQ. Can the green credit policy promote green innovation in enterprises? Empirical evidence from China. Technol Econ Dev Econ2024; 3: 20497.
19.
FecherFWindingJHutterK, et al.Innovation labs from a participants’ perspective. J Bus Res2020; 110: 567–576.
20.
SuJHSunYD. An improved TOPSIS model based on cumulative prospect theory: application to ESG performance evaluation of State-Owned mining enterprises. Sustainability2023; 15(13): 10046.
21.
WangCShiJXYangY, et al.Two methods with bidirectional similarity for optimal selections of supplier portfolio and supplier substitute based on TOPSIS and IFS. IEEE Access2024; 12: 1761–1773.
22.
ChenTY. Evolved distance measures for circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their exploitation in the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions. Artif Intell Rev2023; 56(7): 7347–7401.
23.
KangHYChaeSTChungES. Quantifying medium-sized city flood vulnerability due to climate change using multi-criteria decision-making techniques: case of Republic of Korea. Sustainability2023; 15(22): 16061.
24.
CiardielloFGenoveseA. A comparison between TOPSIS and SAW methods. Ann Oper Res2023; 325(2): 967–994.
25.
QiQS. TOPSIS methods for probabilistic hesitant fuzzy MAGDM and application to performance evaluation of public charging service quality. Informatica-Lithuan2023; 34(2): 317–336.
26.
WuXXZhuZYChenC, et al.A monotonous intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method under general linear orders via admissible distance measures. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst2023; 31(5): 1552–1565.
27.
AlghazzawiDAlolyianHLatifL, et al.A cutting-edge TOPSIS approach for navigating MCDM challenges under t-intuitionistic fuzzy environments. IEEE Access2024; 12: 44873–44887.
28.
SunMMAlamFMaCX. How nurses’ person-organization fit influences organizational loyalty. Risk Manag Healthc Policy2023; 16: 2019–2036.
29.
ChuMN. Assessing the benefits of ChatGPT for business: an empirical study on organizational performance. IEEE Access2023; 11: 76427–76436.
30.
HaskasapESanerTEyupogluS, et al.Influence of organizational democracy on organizational citizenship behaviors in digital transformation: mediating effects of job satisfaction and organizational commitment for smart services. Sustainability2023; 15(1): 452.
31.
ZhaoYLiQYLyuJL. Quantity or quality? The impact of multilevel network structural holes on firm innovation. Systems2024; 12(2): 57.
