Aiming at the problem of insufficient real-time dynamic risk modeling in Human Factors Engineering (HFE), this study proposes the Parameterized Bayesian Network (PBN-KL) optimization method. The method fuses multi-source physiological, cognitive, and environmental parameters and significantly improves risk prevention and control effectiveness through KL scatter-driven adaptive structure learning and real-time decision engine. In the validation of NASA-TLX and UCI-HAR datasets, the prevention and control accuracy is improved by 15.2%, the response delay is reduced by 40.7%, and the prevention and control success rate reaches 92.3% compared with the traditional method. The framework provides an interpretable and real-time active security solution for high interaction scenarios under the national strategic needs of intelligent manufacturing “digital twin” and precision medicine, bridging the gap between theoretical modeling and practical application needs.
RauchELinderCDallasegaP. Anthropocentric perspective of production before and within industry 4.0. Comput Ind Eng2020; 139: 105644.
2.
Lange-MoralesKThatcherAGarcía-AcostaG. Towards a sustainable world through human factors and ergonomics: it is all about values. Ergonomics2014; 57: 1603–1615.
3.
KarwowskiWSalvendyG. Advances in human factors, ergonomics, and safety in manufacturing and service industries. CRC Press2010; 1: 123.
4.
SunLZhangYZhouZ, et al.Current situation and development trend of intelligent product design under the background of human-centered AI. Packag Eng2020; 41: 1–6.
5.
LiWChengRGargA, et al.Batteries boost the internet of everything: technologies and potential orientations in renewable energy sources, new energy vehicles, energy interconnection and transmission. Sustain Energy Grids Netw2024; 37: 101273.
6.
FreschiCFerrariVMelfiF, et al.Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator. Int J Med Robot2013; 9: 396–406.
7.
SteentjesSPetrunMDolinarD, et al.Effect of parameter identification procedure of the static hysteresis model on dynamic hysteresis loop shapes. IEEE Trans Magn2016; 52: 1–4.
8.
WieringaRJ. Combining static and dynamic modelling methods: a comparison of four methods. Comput J1995; 38: 17–30.
9.
SalvendyG. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. John Wiley & Sons, 2012, vol 20, pp. 715–732.
10.
LiMLiuZLiX, et al.Dynamic risk assessment in healthcare based on Bayesian approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2019; 189: 327–334.
11.
ZhongKYangZXiaoG, et al.An efficient parallel reinforcement learning approach to cross-layer defense mechanism in industrial control systems. IEEE Trans Parallel Distr Syst2021; 33: 2979–2990.
12.
ZengQ. Multi-source heterogeneous data fusion model based on fuzzy mathematics. J Comput Methods Sci Eng2023; 23: 2165–2178.
13.
VoseD. Risk analysis: a quantitative guide. John Wiley & Sons, 2008, vol 1, p. 31.
14.
XieXGuoD. Human factors risk assessment and management: process safety in engineering. Process Saf Environ Prot2018; 113: 467–482.
15.
ChenLLuKRajeswaranA, et al.Decision transformer: reinforcement learning via sequence modeling. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst2021; 34: 15084–15097.
16.
WangARussakovskyO. Overwriting pretrained bias with finetuning data. Proceedings on Computer Vision2023; 1: 3957–3968.
17.
OxmanR. Thinking difference: theories and models of parametric design thinking. Des Stud2017; 52: 4–39.
18.
PearlJ. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Elsevier, 2014, vol 1, p. 20.
19.
SujanMPoolRSalmonP. Eight human factors and ergonomics principles for healthcare artificial intelligence. BMJ Health Care Inform2022; 29: e100516.
SunXLiuYXuM, et al.Feature selection using dynamic weights for classification. Knowl Base Syst2013; 37: 541–549.
22.
HoldenRJValdezRSLangAR. Applying human factors and ergonomics to study and improve patient work: key takeaways and next steps. The Patient Factor2021; 1: 249–260.
23.
BorghiniGVecchiatoGToppiJ, et al.Assessment of mental fatigue during car driving by using high resolution EEG activity and neurophysiologic indices. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc2012; 3: 6442–6445.
24.
PearlJ. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Elsevier, 2014, vol 1, p. 35.
25.
GoodD. Predicting real-time adaptive performance in a dynamic decision-making context. J Manag Organ2014; 20: 715–732.
26.
WangZYaoSLiG, et al.Multiobjective combinatorial optimization using a single deep reinforcement learning model. IEEE Trans Cybern2023; 54: 1984–1996.
27.
ZhangHZhouAZhangH. An evolutionary forest for regression. IEEE Trans Evol Comput2021; 26: 735–749.
28.
MunS. Overview of understanding and quantifying cognitive load. J Ergon Soc Korea2018; 37: 337–346.
29.
ThatcherANayakRWatersonP. Human factors and ergonomics systems-based tools for understanding and addressing global problems of the twenty-first century. Ergonomics2020; 63: 367–387.
30.
KaikkonenLParviainenTRahikainenM, et al.Bayesian networks in environmental risk assessment: a review. Integrated Environ Assess Manag2020; 17: 62–78.
31.
SalvendyG. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. John Wiley & Sons, 2012, vol 1, p. 20.
32.
BoehmUMatzkeDGrettonM, et al.Real-time prediction of short-timescale fluctuations in cognitive workload. Cogn Res Princ Implic2021; 6: 1–29.
