The trend of network violence and false information dissemination is getting faster and faster. This paper uses private key signature and public key verification to ensure the authenticity and integrity of digital contracts. The decentralization and invariance of blockchain technology can strengthen data protection and privacy protection, and it can solve the problem that traditional manual methods cannot effectively reduce network violence and false information dissemination. In terms of cyber violence, 128 netizens in City A experienced cyber bullying in 2021, and 52 netizens experienced cyber bullying in 2022. Compared with the number of people who experienced cyberbullying in 2021, the number of people who experienced cyberbullying in 2022 decreased by 59.38%. In terms of false information, the number of false advertising events in City A in 2022 decreased by 60% compared with 2021. This study highlights the positive role of digital contracts in mitigating internet violence and curbing the spread of false information, contributing to the creation of a safer, more trustworthy, and healthier online environment.
LiZZhangWYZhangHT, et al.Global digital compact: a mechanism for the governance of online discriminatory and misleading content generation. Int J Hum Comput Interact2024; 2(18): 23–34.
2.
FinkelhorDKerryannWJonesL, et al.Youth internet safety education: aligning programs with the evidence base. Trauma Violence Abuse2021; 22(5): 1233–1247.
3.
WangXTLiuLChenBL, et al.The mediating effect of self-control on the relationship between exposure to violence and fighting among Chinese secondary school students. J Sch Violence2021; 21(1): 34–47.
4.
ChoJHCookTRagerS. Uncertainty-based false information propagation in social networks. ACM Trans Soc Comput2019; 2(2): 1–34.
5.
MoZYPanDQLiuH, et al.The problem and root cause analysis of false information in AIGC from the perspective of information quality. Libr Inf Knowl2023; 40(4): 32–40.
6.
LiMG. A secure transmission method for computer network data based on data encryption technology. China Comput & Commun2022; 34(15): 229–231.
7.
HuangJLWangJ. A protection method for communication data privacy based on unbalanced blockchain category networks. Telecom Power Technol2022; 39(22): 104–106.
8.
YazdeenAASubhiRMMohammed SadeeqM, et al.FPGA implementations for data encryption and decryption via concurrent and parallel computation: a review. Qubahan Acad J2021; 1(2): 8–16.
9.
GohdesAR. Repression technology: internet accessibility and state violence. Am J Polit Sci2020; 64(3): 488–503.
10.
GaudetteTRyanSVivekV. The role of the internet in facilitating violent extremism: insights from former right-wing extremists. Terrorism Polit Violence2022; 34(7): 1339–1356.
11.
BackeELPamelaLJenniferMS. Networked indiiduals, gendered violence: a literature review of cyberviolence. Violence Gend2018; 5(3): 135–146.
12.
MaswoodRSuparnaR. Social transmission of false memory in small groups and large networks. Top Cogn Sci2019; 11(4): 687–709.
13.
GhanemBPaoloRFranciscoR. An emotional analysis of false information in social media and news articles. ACM Trans Internet Technol2020; 20(2): 1–18.
14.
ZannettouSMichaelSJeremyB, et al.The web of false information: rumors, fake news, hoaxes, clickbait, and various other shenanigans. J Data Inf Qual2019; 11(3): 1–37.
15.
SunLYuanRWuLW, et al.Fighting false information from propagation process: a survey. ACM Comput Surv2023; 55(10): 1–38.
16.
VosoughiSDebRSinanA. The spread of true and false news online. Science2018; 359(6380): 1146–1151.
17.
BabcockMDavidMBKathleenMC. Different faces of false: the spread and curtailment of false information in the Black panther Twitter discussion. J Data Inf Qual2019; 11(4): 1–15.
18.
EntmanRMNikkiU. Framing in a fractured democracy: impacts of digital technology on ideology, power and cascading network activation. J Commun2018; 68(2): 298–308.
19.
MolinaMDShyamSLeT, et al.“Fake news” is not simply false information: a concept explication and taxonomy of online content. Am Behav Sci2021; 65(2): 180–212.
20.
AhmedMAl-SakibKP. False data injection attack (FDIA): an overview and new metrics for fair evaluation of its countermeasure. Complex Adapt Syst Model2020; 8(1): 1–14.
21.
SaravisthaDBSukadanaIKKadekDS. Urgency of contract model settings in the global digital market related to tourism business: a study on consumer protection and electronic information and transactions. Budap Int Res Crit Inst J2022; 5(1): 4549–4556.
22.
AljasirSAMaisoonOA. Cyberbullying and cybervictimization on digital media platforms: the role of demographic variables and parental mediation strategies. Humanit Soc Sci Commun2022; 9(1): 1–9.
23.
LiuY. Research on network data encryption system based on improved GANs algorithm. Int J Wireless Mobile Comput2023; 25(1): 68–75.
24.
KlijnEHIrisK. Governance and media attention: a research agenda about how media affect (network) governance processes. Perspect Public Manag Gov2018; 1(2): 103–113.
25.
GorodALHTiepN. A systemic approach to complex project management: integration of command-and-control and network governance. Syst Res Behav Sci2018; 35(6): 811–837.
26.
CraggTMcNamaraTDescubesI, et al.Manufacturing SMEs, network governance and global supply chains. J Small Bus Enterprise Dev2020; 27(1): 130–147.
27.
FauziahZHaznahLXavierO, et al.Application of blockchain technology in smart contracts: a systematic literature review. APTISI Trans Technopreneursh2020; 2(2): 160–166.
28.
SavantVBRupaliDK. A review on network security and cryptography. Res J Eng Technol2021; 12(4): 110–114.
29.
LinSYZhangLLiJ, et al.A survey of application research based on blockchain smart contract. Wirel Netw2022; 28(2): 635–690.
