Torsional effects in planar irregular buildings can lead to structural damage, making torsional response analysis of buildings a critical aspect of structural design. This study conducts numerical simulations on L-shaped frames subjected to frequent earthquakes to investigate the influence of low-frequency content on the torsional responses of planar irregular frame structures (PIFSs). Five L-shaped frame models with varying length-to-width ratios (L/B) of the protruding limbs-1:1, 1.5:1, 2:1, 2.5:1, and 3:1 were developed using ABAQUS. Columns were modeled using solid elements, reinforcing steel with truss elements, and floor slabs with shell elements. The peak shear forces and bending moments in corner columns were compared under various conditions of low-frequency content to analyze the effects of low-frequency content and L/B ratios on wave passage effect in frames. The results indicate that when the low-frequency content of seismic waves is sufficient, wave passage effect occurs in outer corner columns, whereas inner corner columns remain unaffected. At apparent wave velocity of 2000 m/s, increasing L/B ratios amplify peak shear forces and bending moments in wave-facing outer corner columns by 28.3% and 43.8%, respectively. Conversely, when the low-frequency content of seismic waves is insufficient, neither outer nor inner corner columns exhibit wave passage effect.
HaoH. Response of two-way eccentric building to nonuniform base excitations. Eng Struct1998; 20(8): 677–684.
2.
LeeD-GKimH-SChunMH. Efficient seismic analysis of high-rise building structures with the effects of floor slabs. Eng Struct2002; 24(5): 613–623.
3.
KapposAJStefanidouS. A deformation-based seismic design method for 3D R/C irregular buildings using inelastic dynamic analysis. Bull Earthq Eng2009; 8(4): 875–895.
4.
NaveenSEAbrahamNMKumariASD. Analysis of irregular structures under earthquake loads. Struct Integ Procedia2019; 14: 806–819.
5.
NewmarkNM (1969). Torsion in symmetrical buildings. In: Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, pp. A3, 19–32.
6.
ShakibHTohidiRZ. Evaluation of accidental eccentricity in buildings due to rotational component of earthquake. J Earthq Eng2002; 6(4): 431–445.
7.
JuárezMAvilésJ. Effective eccentricity due to the effects of structural asymmetry and wave passage. Eng Struct2008; 30(3): 831–844.
8.
ZhangYHLinj. HWilliamsF, et al.Wave passage effect of seismic ground motions on the response of multiply supported structures. Struct Eng Mech2005; 20(6): 655–672.
9.
CaoYMeza-FajardoKCMavroeidisGP, et al.Effects of wave passage on torsional response of symmetric buildings subjected to near-fault pulse-like ground motions. Soil Dynam Earthq Eng2016; 88: 109–123.
10.
CaoYMavroeidisGPMeza-FajardoKC, et al.Accidental eccentricity in symmetric buildings due to wave passage effects arising from near-fault pulse-like ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam2017; 46(13): 2185–2207.
11.
DahmardehSRMotamediMAziminejadA. Effect of torsional component of earthquakes on response of symmetric/asymmetric buildings. Struct Build2020; 173(11): 858–878.
12.
HaoHDuanX. Multiple excitation effects on response of symmetric buildings. Eng Struct1996; 18(9): 732–740.
13.
HaoH. Torsional response of building structures to spatial random ground excitations. Eng Struct1997; 19(2): 105–112.
14.
Heredia-ZavoniELeyvaA. (2003). Torsional response of symmetric buildings to incoherent and phase-delayed earthquake ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam, 32(7): 1021–1038.
15.
GuBLiuT. Analytical solutions for torsional response of single-story frame structure subjected to seismic wave passage excitation. In: TunsIMunteanRRaduD, et al. (eds). Proceedings of CIBv 2023. CIBv 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Cham: Springer, 2024, vol 510, pp. 250–262.
16.
LiWLiuTWangY. Time-domain solutions for torsional response of single-story symmetric frame structure under earthquake wave passage excitation. Earthq Eng Eng Dynam2024; 44(3): 136–145, (in Chinese).
17.
PachlaFKowalska-KoczwaraATataraT, et al.The influence of vibration duration on the structure of irregular RC buildings. Bull Earthq Eng2019; 17: 3119–3138.
18.
MoustafaMKFadzliMN. Integrated approach between seismic resilience and vulnerability indexes with regularity index for vertical irregularity planar frames risk assessment. Bull Earthq Eng2023; 21: 1903–1941.
19.
NoureldinMAliTKimJ. Machine learning-based seismic assessment of framed structures with soil-structure interaction. Front Struct Civ Eng2023; 17: 205–223.
20.
MehtaVCheyMH. Seismic performance and assessment of RC framed structure with geometric irregularities. Asian J Civ Eng2023; 24: 479–496.
21.
ThippaPKTripathiRKBhatG. Seismic assessment of structures with mass and stiffness irregularities under multiple earthquakes. J Build Rehabil2024; 9: 46.
22.
AkashSinhaAK. Nonlinear time history seismic performance of a base isolated vertically irregular reinforced concrete framed buildings for the near-pulsing ground vibrations. Asian J Civ Eng2024; 25: 5179–5195.
23.
ThippaPKTripathiRKBhatG. A case study on the effect of multiple earthquakes on mid-rise RC buildings with mass and stiffness irregularity in height. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng2024; 49: 2693–2714.
24.
BlasiGScarlinoASChirivìS, et al.Seismic response of irregular RC buildings designed for gravity and seismic loads. Bull Earthq Eng2024; 22: 5231–5257.
25.
ChavanSAMateNU. Performance-based analysis: for vulnerability assessment of vertical irregularities in reinforced concrete structure with soil-structure interaction. Innov Infrastruct Solut2025; 10: 101.
26.
OygucRTorosCAbdelnabyAE. Seismic behavior of irregular reinforced-concrete structures under multiple earthquake excitations. Soil Dynam Earthq Eng2018; 104: 15–32.
27.
GhadamianAAlirezaeiM. Progressive collapse in concrete structures of regular and irregular plans in earthquake. Proc Inst Civil Eng Struct Build2018; 174(2): 99–116.
28.
MoonD-SLeeY-JLeeS. Fragility analysis of space reinforced concrete frame structures with structural irregularity in plan. J Struct Eng2018; 144(8): 04018096.
29.
CancellaraDDe AngelisF. Assessment and dynamic nonlinear analysis of different base isolation systems for a multi-storey RC building irregular in plan. Comput Struct2017; 180: 74–88.
30.
FabioDADonatoC. Dynamic analysis and vulnerability reduction of asymmetric structures: fixed base vs base isolated system. Compos Struct2019; 219: 203–220.
31.
BhaskerRMenonA. Characterization of ground motion intensity for the seismic fragility assessment of plan-irregular RC buildings. Structures2020; 27: 1763–1776.
32.
BlasoneVBasagliaADe RisiR, et al.A simplified model for seismic safety assessment of reinforced concrete buildings: framework and application to a 3-storey plan-irregular moment resisting frame. Eng Struct2022; 250: 113348.
33.
ShwetaDChaulagainH. Seismic behaviour of plan irregular reinforced concrete buildings considering soil effects. J Build Pathol Rehabil2023; 8: 46.
34.
Ebadi-JamkhanehMKontoniD-PNHomaioon EbrahimiA. Assessment of different methods for enhancing progressive collapse resistance of irregular reinforced concrete buildings using pushdown analysis. Arab J Sci Eng2024; 49: 13861–13883.
35.
SanghaiSGurmuleC. Seismic response control of RCC building with plan and vertical irregularities using dampers. J Build Rehabil2024; 9: 9.
36.
GhanemALeeY-JMoonD-S. Seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete frame Structures: obtaining plan or vertical mass irregularity from structure use change. J Struct Eng2024; 150(3): 04023243.
MHURDOC (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China). Code for design of concrete structures (GB 50010-2010). Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2010.
