The Fourth Industrial Revolution has introduced intelligent digital technologies, such as virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR), across various sectors, including education. The research aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current research landscape and offer insights to guide future studies on AR and VR in vocational education. Bibliometric analysis is used to explore the performance analysis, science mapping, trend analysis, and application analysis of these technologies in vocational education. There are four key findings: First, VR research in vocational education has higher publication and citation rates than AR, with China, Spain, and the United States as leading contributors. Second, AR focuses on enhancing traditional education through “students” and “education,” while VR emphasizes immersive “learning environments” and “outcomes.” Third, the growing trend centers on “education” and “students,” reflecting increased interest in online learning. Fourth, AR and VR applications in vocational education show that AR enhances student skills, learning performance, and motivation, while VR advances practical training, learning outcomes and technological and practical aspects. These findings provide valuable insights that can inform future research directions in vocational education, particularly in exploring how AR and VR technologies can be more effectively integrated into educational practices.
Aprilla FortunaAPrasetyaFCabanillas GarcíaJL, et al.Modern learning paradigms: a bibliometric analysis of augmented reality and virtual reality in vocational education. Journal Pendidikan Teknologi Kejuruan2024; 7(2): 91–114.
2.
AbulibdehAZaidanEAbulibdehR. Navigating the confluence of artificial intelligence and education for sustainable development in the era of industry 4.0: challenges, opportunities, and ethical dimensions. J Clean Prod2024; 437: 140527.
3.
TimotheouSMiliouODimitriadisY, et al.Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: a literature review. Educ Inf Technol2023; 28: 6695–6726.
4.
BerendtBLittlejohnABlakemoreM. AI in education: learner choice and fundamental rights. Learn Media Technol2020; 45: 312–324.
5.
Cabero-AlmenaraJFernández-BataneroJMBarroso-OsunaJ. Adoption of augmented reality technology by university students. Heliyon2019; 5: e01597.
6.
MaasMJHughesJM. Virtual, augmented and mixed reality in K–12 education: a review of the literature. Technol Pedagog Educ2020; 29: 231–249.
7.
VerheyJTHaglinJMVerheyEM, et al.Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality applications in orthopedic surgery. Int J Med Robot2020; 16: e2067.
8.
MhlongoSMbathaKRamatsetseB, et al.Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: an iterative review. Heliyon2023; 9(6): e16348.
9.
AgustinaWWSumartoSTrisnoB. Augmented reality based on STEM for supporting science literacy in vocational education. J Phys: Conf Ser2019; 1375(1): 012088.
10.
KavanaghSLuxton-ReillyAWuenscheB, et al.A systematic review of virtual reality in education. Themes in Sci Tech Edu2017; 10(2): 85–119. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/182115/
11.
ScavarelliAAryaATeatherRJ. Virtual reality and augmented reality in social learning spaces: a literature review. Virtual Real2020; 25(2): 257–277.
12.
Degli InnocentiEGeronazzoMVescoviD, et al.Mobile virtual reality for musical genre learning in primary education. Comput Educ2019; 139: 102–117.
13.
SamosornABGilbertGEBaumanEB, et al.Teaching airway insertion skills to nursing faculty and students using virtual reality: a pilot study. Clin Simul Nurs2020; 39: 18–26.
14.
BabuSVinayagamDVenkatesanM, et al.Virtual reality learning environments for vocational education: enhancing knowledge retention and transfer. J Educ Technol Syst2018; 47(1): 33–48.
15.
SakrAAbdullahT. Virtual, augmented reality and learning analytics impact on learners, and educators: a systematic review. Educ Inf Technol2024; 29: 19913–19962.
16.
Bacca-AcostaJTejadaJOspino-IbañezC. Learning to follow directions in English through a virtual reality environment: an eye tracking study and evaluation of usability. In: Designing, Deploying, and Evaluating Virtual and Augmented Reality in Education. IGI Global, 2021, pp. 262–288.
17.
BabalolaAManuPCheungC, et al.Applications of immersive technologies for occupational safety and health training and education: a systematic review. Saf Sci2023; 166: 106214.
18.
MazzucoAKrassmannALReateguiE, et al.A systematic review of augmented reality in chemistry education. Rev Educ2022; 10(1): e3325.
19.
McCloskeyKTurlipRAhmadHS, et al.Virtual and augmented reality in spine surgery: a systematic review. World Neurosurg2023; 173: 96–107.
20.
AhmadT. Scenario based approach to re-imagining future of higher education which prepares students for the future of work. High Educ Skills Work base Learn2020; 10(1): 217–238.
21.
SpöttlG&WindelbandL. The 4th industrial revolution–its impact on vocational skills. J Educ Work2021; 34(1): 29–52.
22.
MuzataARSinghGStepanovMS, et al.Immersive learning: a systematic literature review on transforming engineering education through virtual reality. Virtual Worlds2024; 3(4): 480–505.
23.
AzmanMAAzmanAHAbu-SamahA, et al.A review on recent trends and challenges of virtual immersive learning in engineering education. ASEAN J Teach Learn High Edu2023; 15: 388–405.
24.
DiegmannPSchmidt-KraepelinMEyndenS, et al.Beneffts of augmented reality in educational environments - a systematic literature review. Wirtschaffsinformatik Proceedings2015; 2015: 103. https://aisel.aisnet.org/wi2015/103
25.
RavichandranRMahapatraJ. Virtual reality in vocational education and training: challenges and possibilities. J Dig Learn Edu2023; 3(1): 25–31.
26.
MekacherL. Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR): the future of interactive vocational education and training for people with handicap. pijtel2019; 3(1): 14–22.
27.
YangMJSheDDXuQ, et al.Inefficiencies of augmented reality for different sexes and grades in Chinese vocational education. Sci Rep2023; 13: 21290.
28.
NursetiawatiSSiregarJS&PursariR. A literature review: augmented reality-based learning in Sundanese Siger bridal make-up. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2021; 1098: 032085.
29.
CandidoVRaemyPAmenduniF, et al.Could vocational education benefit from augmented reality and hypervideo technologies? An exploratory interview study. Int J Res Vocat Educ Train2023; 10(2): 138–167.
30.
AnnafiAHakimDLRohendiD. Impact of using augmented reality applications in the educational environment. J Phys : Conf Ser2019; 1375: 012080.
31.
BaccaJBaldirisSFabregatR, et al.Mobile augmented reality in vocational education and training. Procedia Comput Sci2015; 75: 49–58.
32.
PipattanasukTSongsriwittayaA. Development of an instructional model with augmented reality technology for vocational certificate students. Int J InStruct2020; 13(3): 539–554.
33.
KunaPHaškováABorzaL. Creation of virtual reality for education purposes. Sustainability2023; 15: 7153.
34.
PletzC. Which factors promote and inhibit the technology acceptance of immersive virtual reality technology in teaching-learning contexts? Results of an expert survey. Int J Emerg Technol Learn2021; 16(13): 20521.
35.
MuldersM. Vocational training in virtual reality: a case study using the 4C/ID model. Multimodal Technol Interact2022; 6: 49.
36.
XiangQFQiuFYWangJ, et al.Engineering design and evaluation of the process evaluation method of auto repair professional training in virtual reality environment. Appl Sci2022; 12: 12200.
37.
MuldersMBuchnerJKerresM. Virtual reality in vocational training: a study demonstrating the potential of a VR-based vehicle painting simulator for skills acquisition in apprenticeship training. Technol Knowl Learn2022; 29: 697–712.
38.
AriaMCuccurulloC. Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics2017; 11(4): 959–975.
39.
HuangLChenKZhouM. Climate change and carbon sink: a bibliometric analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int2020; 27(8): 8740–8758.
40.
XieHLZhangYWWuZL, et al.A bibliometric analysis on land degradation: current status, development, and future directions. Land2020; 9(1): 28–65.
41.
LiuWHZhengJWWangZR, et al.A bibliometric review of ecological research on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, 1990–2019. Ecol Inform2021; 64: 101337.
42.
WangXWFangZCSunXL. Usage patterns of scholarly articles on web of science: a study on web of science usage count. Scientometrics2016; 109: 917–926.
43.
SilvaBNKhanMHanK. Towards sustainable smart cities: a review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustain Cities Soc2018; 38: 697–713.
44.
Merigo´JMGil-LafuenteAMYagerRR. An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators. Appl Soft Comput2015; 27: 420–433.
45.
Gaviria-MarinMMerigo´JMBaier-FuentesH. Knowledge management: a global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Change2019; 140: 194–220.
46.
LiYWangZP. Mapping the literature on academic publishing: a bibliometric analysis on WOS. Sage Open2023; 2023(1): 1–16.
47.
CastañedaKSánchezOHerreraRF, et al.Highway planning trends: a bibliometric analysis. Sustainability2022; 14: 5544.
48.
LoureiroSMCGuerreiroJAliF. 20 years of research on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism context: a text-mining approach. Tour Manag2020; 77: 104028.
49.
BernardoNDuarteE. Immersive virtual reality in an industrial design education context. Comp-Aid Des App2022; 19(2): 238–255.
50.
UpasaniNMannaARanjanikarM. Augmented, virtual and mixed reality research in cultural heritage: a bibliometric study. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl2023; 14: 832–842.
51.
Della CorteVDel GaudioGSepeF, et al.Sustainable tourism in the open innovation realm: a bibliometric analysis. Sustainability2019; 11: 6114.
52.
EsfahaniHJTavasoliKJabbarzadehA. A. Big data and social media: a scientometrics analysis. International Journal of Data and Network Science2019; 3: 145–164.
53.
López-RoblesJ-RGuallarJOtegi-OlasoJ-R, et al.El profesional de la información (Epi): Bibliometric and thematic analysis (2006–2017). El Prof Inf2019; 28: e280417.
54.
AgboFJOyelereSSSuhonenJ, et al.Scientific production and thematic breakthroughs in smart learning environments: a bibliometric analysis. Smart Learn Environ2021; 8: 1.
55.
Di CosmoAPinelliCScandurraA, et al.Research trends in octopus biological studies. Animals2021; 11: 1808.
56.
SchögglJ-PStumpfLBaumgartnerRJ. The narrative of sustainability and circular economy-A longitudinal review of two decades of research. Resour Conserv Recycl2020; 163: 105073.
57.
ShkundalovDVilutienėT. Bibliometric analysis of building information modeling, geographic information systems and web environment integration. Autom ConStruct2021; 128: 103757.
58.
WenQJRenZJLuH, et al.The progress and trend of BIM research: a bibliometrics-based visualization analysis. Autom ConStruct2021; 124: 103558.
59.
LiuGQSamuQBGuoTT, et al.Using immersive media technology to teach ideological and political theory courses in Shandong vocational colleges. Region-Educational Research and Reviews2024; 6(2): 1725–1924.
60.
GhoshLRavichandranR. Emerging technologies in vocational education and training. J Dig Learn Edu2024; 24(1): 55–68.
61.
FortunaAPrasetyaFGarcíaJLC. Modern learning paradigms: a bibliometric analysis of augmented reality and virtual reality in vocational education. SSRN Electron J2024; 7: 91–114.
62.
ShenYLiuQZhangK, et al.The application of artificial intelligence technology in vocational college training. In: PaasFPatnaikSWangT (eds). Recent Trends in Educational Technology and Administration. EduTA 2023. Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems, 2023, pp. 111–119.
63.
LernerDMohrSSchildJ, et al.An immersive multi-user virtual reality for emergency simulation training: usability study. JMIR Serious Games2020; 8(3): e18822.
64.
LukheleBNLaseindeOT. Exploring mechanical engineering equipment at TVET colleges in South Africa, towards integrating virtual and cyber-physical learning. Procedia Comput Sci2024; 232: 2690–2700.
65.
ChanVSHaronHNHIshamMIBM, et al.VR and AR virtual welding for psychomotor skills: a systematic review. Multimed Tool Appl2022; 81: 12459–12493.
66.
AdnanMTWidiatyIMulyantiB. Analysis development of augmented reality in android-based computer learning in vocational schools. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2020; 830: 032059.
67.
LeeCJHsuY. Sustainable education using augmented reality in vocational certification courses. Sustainability2021; 13: 6434.
68.
Moreno MartínezNMFranco-MariscalAJ. Educational possibilities of the augmented reality tool ZapWorks in science education. An experience with Master’s Degree in Teaching students. Tecnología, Ciencia y Educación2023; 24: 91–118.
69.
KiegaldieDShawL. Virtual reality simulation for nursing education: effectiveness and feasibility. BMC Nurs2023; 22: 488.
70.
PrasetyaFSyahriBFajriBR, et al.Utilizing virtual laboratory to improve CNC distance learning of vocational students at higher education. TEM J2023; 12(3): 1506–1518.
71.
ValleraFL. Durkheim said what? creating talking textbooks with augmented reality and project-based activities. J Res Technol Educ2019; 51(3): 290–310.
72.
Syed SazlySZJambariHNoh@SethNH, et al.Development of augmented reality applications in teaching and learning for a topic of current and voltage division for technical and vocational education. Journal of Technical Education and Training2021; 13(3): 125–132.
73.
Mondragón BernalIFLozano-RamírezNEPuerto CortésJM, et al.An immersive virtual reality training game for power substations evaluated in terms of usability and engagement. Appl Sci2022; 12(2): 711.
74.
ZhongMHZhouYP. Virtual-reality system for elevator maintenance education: design, implementation and evaluation. Engineering Reports2024; 6(6): e12873.
75.
CarreonASmithSJFreyB, et al.Comparing immersive VR and non-immersive VR on social skill acquisition for students in middle school with ASD. J Res Technol Educ2023; 56(5): 530–543.
76.
BoelCDekeyserKLemalM, et al.Towards a framework for a nation-wide implementation of augmented, virtual and mixed reality in K-12 technical and vocational education. TechTrends2024; 68: 295–306.
77.
DobrickiMKimKGCoppiAE, et al.Perceived educational usefulness of a virtual-reality work situation depends on the spatial human-environment relation. Res Learn Technol2021; 29: 2453.
78.
DedeDAbdullahAGMulyantiB, et al.Review TVET learning innovation: augmented reality technology for virtual 3D laboratory. J Phys : Conf Ser2019; 1402: 077062.
79.
DoolaniSWesselsCKanalV, et al.A review of extended reality (XR) technologies for manufacturing training. Technologies2020; 8(4): 77.
80.
Ortega-GrasJ-JGómez-GómezM-VBueno-DelgadoM-V, et al.Designing a technological pathway to empower vocational education and training in the circular wood and furniture sector through extended reality. Electronics2023; 12(12): 2328.
81.
MaierWMöhringHCFengQ, et al.Augmented reality to visualize a finite element analysis for assessing clamping concepts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2024; 133: 2293–2302.
82.
KablitzDConradMSchumannS. Immersive VR-based instruction in vocational schools: effects on domain-specific knowledge and wellbeing of retail trainees. Empir Res Vocat Educ Train2023; 15: 9.
83.
NobleSMSavilleJDFosterLL. VR as a choice: what drives learners’ technology acceptance?Int J Educ Technol High Educ2022; 19: 6.
84.
ZhangYFMoHJ. Reforming the teaching of engineering cost budgeting majors by integrating VR and BIM technology under the internet of things. Secur Commun Network2022; 1: 4183059.
85.
ZhangCChenB. Enhancing learning and teaching for architectural engineering students using virtual building design and construction. High Educ Stud2019; 9(2): 45–56.
