Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Efficiently conducting seismic hazard assessment and retrospective testing of seismic prediction strategies relies on the integration of proprietary seismic data into the forecasting analysis and decision process, however, the large volume and structural diversity of proprietary seismic data, and the fact that related knowledge is stored in multiple databases, throw a stumbling block to data integration. Hence, this paper introduce the Seismic Knowlee Graph (SKG), a flexible and powerful platform currently containing nearly 34,043 nodes and 32,248 relationships, representing the relevant observed data, public databases. The platform contains a variety of proprietary seismic data in different formats and from different data sources, providing data support to realize the data modeling and business process processing of strong and impending earthquake prediction model, so as to build a new model of regional earthquake forecasting study. In this work, we perform data organization of relational databases, and after graph database modeling and data import, we build knowledge graph using HugeGraph, a kind of NoSQL graph database, which organized easily extensible architecture that can be easily scale to new nodes and relationships when generates new data. We use WebGIS technology to build intuitive interfaces to visual graphical databases for user interaction, querying, and roaming the SKG. We illustrate the possibility of using a graph database to build a knowledge graph for seismic forecasting, which establishes a seismic forecast base database, a distributed database system for proprietary earthquake data. This graph database of relational queries has the possibility to reveal new relationships between heterogeneous seismic data and metadata, and it can be demonstrated that the graph structure can provide an efficient and reliable data support service for testing the validity of technical solutions for determining the urgency of strong earthquake generation.

Keywords

seismic knowledge graph (SKG)graph database earthquake forecasting WebGIS visualization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ichiyanagi

Mikhaylov

Kostylev

, et al. Evaluation for hypocenter estimation error in the southwestern Kuril trench using Japan and Russia joint seismic data. Earth Planets Space 2020; 72(1): 86.

Sivandi-Pour

Farsangi

. Statistical prediction of probable seismic hazard zonation of Iran using self-organized artificial intelligence model. Int J Eng 2019; 32(4): 467–473.

Sofyan

Rahayu

Lusiani

. Spatial autocorrelation of earthquake magnitudes in Tripa fault, Aceh province, Indonesia. In 11th Aceh International Workshop and Expo on Sustainable Tsunami Disaster Recovery (AIWEST-DR). Indonesia: Banda Aceh, 2018.

Zakupin

Bogomolov

Boginskaya

. Using the load/unload response ratio and self-developing processes methods of analyzing seismic sequences to predict earthquakes in Sakhalin. Izvestiya Atmos Ocean Phys 2020; 56(7): 693–705.

. Re-estimate of major earthquake activity in surrounding areas after the M-S 6.6 Jinghe earthquake in Xinjiang, 2017. Pure Appl Geophys 2019; 176(2): 563–576.

Mandal

. Lessons learned from the occurrences of major devastating M-w >= 7.5 earthquakes in the Asian countries during the last 25 years. J Geol Soc India 2021; 97(12): 1494–1497.

Peng

Mori

. Characteristics of the foreshock occurrence for M(j)3.0 to 7.2 shallow onshore earthquakes in Japan. Earth Planets Space 2022; 74(1): 40.

Trugman

Ross

. Pervasive foreshock activity across southern California. Geophys Res Lett 2019; 46(15): 8772–8781.

Kourouklas

Mangira

Console

, et al. Short-term clustering modeling of seismicity in Eastern Aegean Sea (Greece): a retrospective forecast test of the 2017 M-w=6.4 Lesvos, 2017 M-w=6.6 Kos and 2020 M-w=7.0 Samos earthquake sequences. Acta Geophys 2021; 69(3): 1085–1099.

10.

Katsumata

Nakatani

. Testing the seismic quiescence hypothesis through retrospective trials of alarm-based earthquake prediction in the Kurile-Japan subduction zone. Earth Planets Space 2021; 73(1): 100.

11.

Ogata

. Prediction and validation of short-to-long-term earthquake probabilities in inland Japan using the hierarchical space-time ETAS and space-time Poisson process models. Earth Planets Space 2022; 74(1): 110.

12.

Zhu

Yue

, et al. Retrospective study of moderate-earthquake prediction in Beijing based on earthquake consultation information. J Seismol Res 2021; 44(4): 583–593.

13.

Han

Cai

Chen

, et al. Preliminary study on the generating mechanism of the atmospheric vertical electric field before earthquakes. Appl Sci (Basel) 2022; 12(14): 6896.

14.

Wang

Xue

Chen

, et al. Study on the characteristic mechanisms of infrasonic precursors during the damage process of impending earthquake sources. PLoS One 2021; 16(10): e0257345.

15.

Zeigarnik

Bogomolov

Novikov

. Electromagnetic earthquake triggering: field observations, laboratory experiments, and physical mechanisms-a review. Izvestiya Phys Solid Earth 2022; 58(1): 30–58.

16.

Zheng

Zhang

Hao

, et al. Physical basis for prediction of continental strong earthquakes: development and prospect of active tectonic block theory. Chin Sci Bull 2022; 67(13): 1352–1361.

17.

Chen

Zhu

, et al. Characteristics and mechanisms of human-induced earthquakes in China from the QuakeQuake database. Geol J 2023; 58(5): 2099–2131.

18.

Omoya

Ero

Zaker Esteghamati

, et al. A relational database to support post-earthquake building damage and recovery assessment. Earthq Spectra 2022; 38(2): 1549–1569.

19.

Liu

Zhu

Cai

, et al. Application of knowledge graph in smart grid fault diagnosis. Appl Math Nonlinear Sci 2023; 8: 349–360.

20.

Ruan

Wang

. Intelligent recommendation of demand response combined with knowledge graph and neural tensor network. Power Syst Technol 2021; 45(6): 2131–2140.

21.

Gong

Wang

, et al. SMR: medical knowledge graph embedding for safe medicine recommendation. Big Data Research 2021; 23: 100174.

22.

Zhang

Fang

, et al. Knowledge-enhanced attributed multi-task learning for medicine recommendation. ACM Trans Inf Syst 2023; 41(1): 1–24.

23.

Zeng

Liu

, et al. Toward better drug discovery with knowledge graph. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2022; 72: 114–126.

24.

Zheng

Yin

Chen

Liu

Yang

. Knowledge base graph embedding module design for visual question answering model. Pattern Recogn 2021; 120: 108153.

25.

Mughal

Moghul

, et al. Pheno4J: a gene to phenotype graph database. Bioinformatics 2017; 33(20): 3317–3319.

26.

Fabregat

Korninger

Viteri

, et al. Reactome graph database: efficient access to complex pathway data. PLoS Comput Biol 2018; 14(1): e1005968.

27.

Balaur

Mazein

Saqi

, et al. Recon2Neo4j: applying graph database technologies for managing comprehensive genome-scale networks. Bioinformatics 2017; 33(7): 1096–1098.

28.

Yoon

B-H

Kim

S-K

Kim

S-Y

. Use of graph database for the integration of heterogeneous biological data. Genomics Inform 2017; 15(1): 19–27.

29.

Lehmann

Isele

Jakob

, et al. DBpedia - a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from Wikipedia. Semant Web 2015; 6(2): 167–195.

A knowledge graph to interpret proprietary data in the seismic industry

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References