Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

Healthcare professionals as well as families play a vital role in ensuring the quality of care for people living with dementia. However, the relationships between healthcare professionals and families of people living with dementia are not extensively examined, particularly within the Chinese cultural context of dementia. The goal of this study was to explore the views of healthcare professionals on their relationships with families of people living with dementia.

Design

This qualitative study was grounded in the interpretative phenomenological analysis framework.

Methods

Data were collected using focus-group interviews. Qualitative data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis.

Results

The study recruited a total of 26 healthcare professionals from 3 long-term care facilities. The study found that conflicts were inherent in the relationships between professionals and families of people living with dementia, and conflicts were found to manifest in three core domains: 1) Families demonstrated a lack of understanding about dementia, 2) Professionals faced challenges in managing families’ unrealistic expectations regarding the disease status and the prognosis of people living with dementia, 3) Families did not perceive themselves as being responsible for the care of people living with dementia.

Conclusions

The present study found that the prevailing factor underpinning the relational conflicts between healthcare professionals and families of people living with dementia, as reported by healthcare professionals was the perceived lack of understanding about dementia amongst families of those affected.

Keywords

dementia relational conflicts community care healthcare professionals family members filial piety

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alzheimer’s Disease International, & Alzheimer’s Australia . (2014). Dementia in the Asia pacific region. Alzheimer’s Disease International, & Alzheimer’s Australia.

Andrews

McInerney

Toye

Parkinson

C.-A.

Robinson

(2017). Knowledge of dementia: Do family members understand dementia as a terminal condition? Dementia, 16(5), 556–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301215605630

Biggerstaff

Thompson

A. R.

(2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A qualitative methodology of choice in healthcare research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5(3), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880802314304

Breen

C. M.

Abernethy

A. P.

Abbott

K. H.

Tulsky

J. A.

(2001). Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(5), 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.00419.x

Cheung

C.-K.

Kwan

A. Y.-H.

(2009). The erosion of filial piety by modernisation in Chinese cities. Ageing and Society, 29(2), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x08007836

Crawley

Moore

Vickerstaff

Fisher

Cooper

Sampson

E. L.

(2022). How do factors of sociodemographic, health literacy and dementia experience influence carers’ knowledge of dementia? Dementia, 21(4), 1270–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012221074219

Cypress

B. S.

(2017). Rigor or reliability and validity in qualitative research: Perspectives, strategies, reconceptualization, and recommendations. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing: DCCN, 36(4). 253–263. https://journals.lww.com/dccnjournal/Fulltext/2017/07000/Rigor_or_Reliability_and_Validity_in_Qualitative.6.aspx

D. Y.-F.

(1994). Filial piety, authoritarian moralism and cognitive conservatism in Chinese societies. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 120(3), 349–365.

Jurgens

F. J.

Clissett

Gladman

J. R.

Harwood

R. H.

(2012). Why are family carers of people with dementia dissatisfied with general hospital care? A qualitative study. BMC Geriatrics, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-12-57

10.

Knight

B. G.

Robinson

G. S.

Flynn Longmire

C. V.

Chun

Nakao

Kim

J. H.

(2002). Cross cultural issues in caregiving for persons with dementia: Do familism values reduce burden and distress? Ageing International, 27(3), 70–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-003-1003-y

11.

Knight

B. G.

Sayegh

(2010). Cultural values and caregiving: The updated sociocultural stress and coping model. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65B(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp096

12.

Laparidou

Middlemass

J. B.

Karran

Siriwardena

(2019). Caregivers’ interactions with health care services – mediator of stress or added strain? Experiences and perceptions of informal caregivers of people with dementia – a qualitative study. Dementia, 18(7-8), 2526–2542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301217751226

13.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

14.

Liu

Dong

(2020). Psychological well-being of Chinese immigrant adult-child caregivers: How do filial expectation, self-rated filial performance, and filial discrepancy matter? Aging & Mental Health, 24(3), 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1544210

15.

Morse

J. M.

Barrett

Mayan

Olson

Spiers

(2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202

16.

Nolan

(2006). Caring connections with older persons with dementia in an acute hospital setting–a hermeneutic interpretation of the staff nurse’s experience. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 1(4), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-3743.2006.00033.x

17.

Olmos-Vega

F. M.

Stalmeijer

R. E.

Varpio

Kahlke

(2022). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE guide no. 149. Medical Teacher, 45(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287

18.

Rolfe

(2006). Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: Quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(3), 304–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03727.x

19.

Schuster

R. A.

Hong

S. Y.

Arnold

R. M.

White

D. B.

(2014). Investigating conflict in ICUs-is the clinicians’ perspective enough? Critical Care Medicine, 42(2), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a27598

20.

Smith

Flowers

Larkin

(2009). Interpretive phenomenological analysis: Theory, method, and research. Sage Publications.

21.

Smith

J. A.

Osborn

(2015). Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain. British Journal of Pain, 9(1), 41–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/2049463714541642

22.

Snow

D. A.

Soule

S. A.

Kriesi

(2004). The Blackwell companion to social movements. Blackwell Pub.

23.

Statistics and Census Service . (2014). Trends and challenges of the ageing population. Statistics and Census Service.

24.

Studdert

D. M.

Mello

M. M.

Burns

J. P.

Puopolo

A. L.

Galper

B. Z.

Truog

R. D.

Brennan

T. A.

(2003). Conflict in the care of patients with prolonged stay in the ICU: Types, sources, and predictors. Intensive Care Medicine, 29(9), 1489–1497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1853-5

25.

The Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of United Nations Secretariat . (2019). The 2019 revision of world population prospects. The Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of United Nations Secretariat.

26.

van der Steen

J. T.

Radbruch

Hertogh

C. M.

de Boer

M. E.

Hughes

J. C.

Larkin

Francke

A. L.

Jünger

Gove

Firth

Koopmans

R. T.

Volicer

(2014). White paper defining optimal palliative care in older people with dementia: A delphi study and recommendations from the European association for palliative care. Palliative Medicine, 28(3), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216313493685

27.

Visser

Deliens

Houttekier

(2014). Physician-related barriers to communication and patient-and family-centred decision-making towards the end of life in intensive care: A systematic review. Critical Care, 18(6), 604–619. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0604-z

28.

J. W.

Van

I. K.

Leong

S. M.

Chuang

Y. C.

Che

S. L.

(2019). General public knowledge and attitudes towards dementia in Macau. Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau.

29.

Yue

S. H.

(1999). Filial obligations and expectations in China: Current views from young and old people in Beijing. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(2), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839x.00035

30.

Zeng

Van

I. K.

(2016). Analysis of early dementia screening in community-dwelling older persons in Macau. Journal of Nursing Administration, 5(1), 339–340.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB

Views of healthcare professionals on their relationships with families of people living with dementia: A qualitative study