Dementia care creates ethical and legal dilemmas due to the struggle to balance the quality of care and personhood. Disagreement and conflict in caregiving relationships are common. However, limited attention has been given to particular stressful circumstances, such as care practice and decision disagreements. Moreover, the cultural context of personhood has been overlooked. This study drew on Hong Kong family caregivers’ reports of their cargiving practice and disagreements with care recipients about care-related decisions and their implications for personhood to identify person-centered family care support needs.
Research Design and Methods
We conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with family caregivers of people with dementia in Hong Kong, China. Participants were asked to share their family dementia caregiving experience and practice, specifically regarding decisions and practices that elicited disagreement. We used thematic analysis to analyze data generated from interviews.
Results
Six caregiver practices were identified: exchange for mutual agreement, a foot-in-the-door approach, acceptance of requests/behaviors contrary to the caregivers’ views, infantilization, treachery, and exclusion and imposition.
Discussion and Implications
These findings highlight the importance of providing support and guidelines for person-centered care to promote personhood in the family caregiving context in dementia care.
AshburnerC.MeyerJ.JohnsonB.SmithC. (2004). Using action research to address loss of personhood in a continuing care setting. Illness, Crisis, and Loss, 12(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/105413730325973
3.
AuA.ShardlowS. M.TengY.TsienT.ChanC. (2013). Coping strategies and social support-seeking behaviour among Chinese caring for older people with dementia. Ageing and Society, 33(8), 1422–1441. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X12000724
4.
BoscoA.SchneiderJ.Coleston-ShieldsD. M.OrrellM. (2018). Dementia care model: Promoting personhood through co-production. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 81, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2018.11.003
CaldwellL.LowL.-F.BrodatyH. (2014). Caregivers' experience of the decision-making process for placing a person with dementia into a nursing home: Comparing caregivers from Chinese ethnic minority with those from English-speaking backgrounds. International Psychogeriatrics, 26(3), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610213002020
9.
CecchinM. L. (2001). Reconsidering the role of being a daughter of a mother with dementia. Journal of Family Studies, 7(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.5172/jfs.7.1.101
10.
ChanS. M.O’ConnorD. L. (2014). Personhood: Including the Chinese person with dementia in research, policy, and practice. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 23(3–4), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2014.932731
11.
ChangY.-P.SchneiderJ. K.SessannaL. (2011). Decisional conflict among Chinese family caregivers regarding nursing home placement of older adults with dementia. Journal of Aging Studies, 25(4), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2011.05.001
12.
ChenX.FanR. (2010). The family and harmonious medical decision making: Cherishing an appropriate confucian moral balance. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 35(5), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhq046
13.
ChenowethL.KingM. T.JeonY.-H.BrodatyH.Stein-ParburyJ.NormanR.HaasM.LuscombeG. (2009). Caring for aged dementia care resident study (CADRES) of person-centred care, dementia-care mapping, and usual care in dementia: A cluster-randomised trial. The Lancet Neurology, 8(4), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70045-6
14.
ChoiS. S. W.BudhathokiC.GitlinL. N. (2019). Impact of three dementia related behaviors on caregiver depression: The role of rejection of care, aggression, and agitation. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 34(7), 966–973. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5097
15.
ChungP. Y. F.Ellis-HillC.ColemanP. (2017). Supporting activity engagement by family carers at home: Maintenance of agency and personhood in dementia. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 12(1), 1267316. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2016.1267316
16.
CiprianiG.BorinG. (2015). Understanding dementia in the sociocultural context: A review. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 61(2), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764014560357
17.
CruiseC. E.LashewiczB. M. (2022). Dementia and dignity of identity: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Dementia, 21(4), 1233–1249. https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012211072929
18.
DarlingN.CumsilleP.MartínezM. L. (2008). Individual differences in adolescents’ beliefs about the legitimacy of parental authority and their own obligation to obey: A longitudinal investigation. Child development, 79(4), 1103–1118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01178.x
DyerS. M.LaverK.PondC. D.CummingR. G.WhiteheadC.CrottyM. (2016). Clinical practice guidelines and principles of care for people with dementia in Australia. Australian Family Physician, 45(12), 884–889.
21.
EdvardssonD.InnesA. (2010). Measuring person-centered care: A critical comparative review of published tools. The Gerontologist, 50(6), 834–846. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq047
22.
EgdellV. (2013). Who cares? Managing obligation and responsibility across the changing landscapes of informal dementia care. Ageing and Society, 33(5), 888–907. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X12000311
23.
FazioS.PaceD.FlinnerJ.KallmyerB. (2018). The fundamentals of person-centered care for individuals with dementia. The Gerontologist, 58(suppl_1), S10–S19.
24.
FreedmanJ. L.FraserS. C. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot in the door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(2), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023552
25.
Gallagher-ThompsonD.CantoP. D.DarnleyS.BasilioL.WhelanL.JacobT. (1997). A feasibility study of videotaping to assess the relationship between distress in Alzheimer's disease caregivers and their interaction style. Aging and Mental Health, 1(4), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607869757047
26.
HayajnehF. A.ShehadehA. (2014). The impact of adopting person centred care approach for people with Alzheimer's on professional caregivers' burden: An interventional study. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 20(4), 438–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12251
27.
HeggestadA. K. T.NortvedtP.SlettebøÅ. (2013). ‘Like a prison without bars’: Dementia and experiences of dignity. Nursing Ethics, 20(8), 881–892. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733013484484
28.
HennellyN.CooneyA.HoughtonC.O’SheaE. (2019). Personhood and dementia care: A qualitative evidence synthesis of the perspectives of people with dementia. The Gerontologist, 61(3), Article e85–e100. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz159
29.
HennellyN.O’SheaE. (2017). Personhood, dementia policy and the Irish national dementia strategy. Dementia, 18(5), 1810–1825. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301217729232
HerronR. V.RosenbergM. W. (2017). Dementia in rural settings: Examining the experiences of former partners in care. Ageing and Society, 39(2), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X17000952
32.
HertoghC. M.TheB. A. M.MiesenB. M.EefstingJ. A. (2004). Truth telling and truthfulness in the care for patients with advanced dementia: An ethnographic study in Dutch nursing homes. Social Science and Medicine, 59(8), 1685–1693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.015
HunterP. V.HadjistavropoulosT.SmytheW. E.MalloyD. C.KaasalainenS.WilliamsJ. (2013). The Personhood in Dementia Questionnaire (PDQ): Establishing an association between beliefs about personhood and health providers’ approaches to person-centred care. Journal of Aging Studies, 27(3), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2013.05.003
35.
JiaL.QuanM.FuY.ZhaoT.LiY.WeiC.TangY.QinQ.WangF.QiaoY. (2020). Dementia in China: Epidemiology, clinical management, and research advances. The Lancet Neurology, 19(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30290-X
36.
JongsmaK.SchwedaM. (2018). Return to childhood? Against the infantilization of people with dementia. Bioethics, 32(7), 414–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12458
37.
KitwoodT. (1990). The dialectics of dementia: With particular reference to Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing and Society, 10(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X00008060
38.
KitwoodT. (1997). Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Oxford University Press.
39.
KitwoodT.BredinK. (1992). Towards a theory of dementia care: Personhood and well-being. Ageing and Society, 12(3), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X0000502X
40.
KoppelmanE. R. (2002). Dementia and dignity: Towards a new method of surrogate decision making. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 27(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1076/jmep.27.1.65.2971
41.
LarssonA.ÖsterholmJ. H. (2014). How are decisions on care services for people with dementia made and experienced? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of recent empirical findings. International Psychogeriatrics, 26(11), 1849–1862. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104161021400132X
42.
LeungK.BrewF. P.ZhangZ.-X.ZhangY. (2011). Harmony and conflict: A cross-cultural investigation in China and Australia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(5), 795–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110363474
43.
LeungK.KochP. T.LuL. (2002). A dualistic model of harmony and its implications for conflict management in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016287501806
LiJ.PorockD. (2014). Resident outcomes of person-centered care in long-term care: A narrative review of interventional research. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(10), 1395–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.04.003
46.
LiouC.-l.JarrottS. E. (2013). Taiwanese experiences: Elders with dementia in two different adult day service (ADS) environments. Aging and Mental Health, 17(8), 942–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2013.788998
47.
LyonsK. S.ZaritS. H.SayerA. G.WhitlatchC. J. (2002). Caregiving as a dyadic process: Perspectives from caregiver and receiver. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(3), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.3.P195
48.
MengelersA. M.BleijlevensM. H.VerbeekH.CapezutiE.TanF. E.HamersJ. P. (2019). Professional and family caregivers’ attitudes towards involuntary treatment in community dwelling people with dementia. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13839
49.
MillerL. M.WhitlatchC. J.LyonsK. S. (2014). Shared decision-making in dementia: A review of patient and family carer involvement. Dementia, 15(5), 1141–1157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301214555542
50.
MilteR.ShulverW.KillingtonM.BradleyC.RatcliffeJ.CrottyM. (2016). Quality in residential care from the perspective of people living with dementia: The importance of personhood. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 63, 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2015.11.007
51.
MolyneauxV. J.ButchardS.SimpsonJ.MurrayC. (2012). The co-construction of couplehood in dementia. Dementia, 11(4), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301211421070
52.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2015). NICE advice [LGB25] Older people in care homes. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Retrieved 2 Aug fromhttp://www.hullpublichealth.org/assets/NICE/lgb25.pdf
53.
NowellZ. C.ThorntonA.SimpsonJ. (2011). The subjective experience of personhood in dementia care settings. Dementia, 12(4), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301211430648
54.
O'ConnorB. P.RigbyH. (1996). Perceptions of baby talk, frequency of receiving baby talk, and self-esteem among community and nursing home residents. Psychology and Aging, 11(1), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.11.1.147
SamsiK.ManthorpeJ. (2013). Everyday decision-making in dementia: findings from a longitudinal interview study of people with dementia and family carers. International Psychogeriatrics, 25(3), 949–961. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610213000306
57.
SjögrenK.LindkvistM.SandmanP. O.ZingmarkK.EdvardssonD. (2013). Person centredness and its association with resident well being in dementia care units. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(10), 2196–2206. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12085
58.
SmebyeK. L.KirkevoldM. (2013). The influence of relationships on personhood in dementia care: A qualitative, hermeneutic study. BMC Nursing, 12(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-12-29
59.
SoofiH. (2021). Normative force of appeals to personhood in dementia care: A critical examination of Kitwood’s account of personhood. Bioethics, 35(9), 884–890. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12942
60.
SunF.OngR.BurnetteD. (2012). The influence of ethnicity and culture on dementia caregiving: A review of empirical studies on Chinese Americans. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias, 27(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317512438224
61.
SuryL.BurnsK.BrodatyH. (2013). Moving in: Adjustment of people living with dementia going into a nursing home and their families. International Psychogeriatrics, 25(6), 867–876. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610213000057
62.
TerkelsenA. S.PetersenJ. V.KristensenH. K. (2020). Mapping empirical experiences of Tom Kitwood’s framework of person centred care for persons with dementia in institutional settings. A scoping review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 34(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12709
63.
TranvågO.PetersenK. A.NådenD. (2015). Relational interactions preserving dignity experience: Perceptions of persons living with dementia. Nursing Ethics, 22(5), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733014549882
64.
TsaiD. F. C. (2009). A Confucian two-dimensional approach to personhood, dementia, and decision-making. In O’ConnorD.PurvesB. (Eds.), Decision-making, personhood and dementia: Exploring the interface (pp. 58–69). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
65.
UK Department of Health. (2009). Living well with dementia: A national dementia strategy. Department of Health.
66.
VikströmS.JosephssonS.Stigsdotter-NeelyA.NygårdL. (2008). Engagement in activities: Experiences of persons with dementia and their caregiving spouses. Dementia, 7(2), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301208091164
YangY. (2015). A family-oriented Confucian approach to advance directives in end-of-life decision making for incompetent elderly patients. In FanR. (Ed.), Family-oriented informed consent: East Asian and American perspectives. (pp. 257–270). Springer.
70.
YehK. H.YiC. C.TsaoW. C.WanP. S. (2013). Filial piety in contemporary Chinese societies: A comparative study of Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China. International Sociology, 28(3), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580913484345
71.
ZellerR. A. (2002). Combining qualitative and quantitative techniques to develop culturally sensitive measures. In OstrowD. G.KesslerR. C. (Eds.), Methodological issues in AIDS behavioral research. (pp. 95–116). Springer.
72.
ZhangX.ClarkeC. L.RhynasS. J. (2019). What is the meaning of filial piety for people with dementia and their family caregivers in China under the current social transitions? An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Dementia, 18(7–8), 2620–2634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301217753775
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
