Media discourses about people living with dementia and carers contribute to the ways in which public, social spaces are designed, planned, and used. Negative media discourses play an important role in the socio-spatial exclusion of people living with dementia and stigmatising and dehumanising language prevents the achievement of genuine, rights-based dementia-friendly environments. Because the media plays a powerful role in shaping public attitudes, there is a need to understand media constructions of people living with dementia and carers in relation to their socio-spatial rights, which is the aim of this paper.
Method
A Foucauldian-inspired discourse analysis (FDA) was conducted on the public news media texts of one regional Australian city, to identify discourses relating to the socio-spatial rights of people living with dementia and carers. Lefebvre’s (1996) ‘right to the city’ concept was used as a conceptual framework, to define socio-spatial rights.
Results
Analysis revealed discourses relating to the right to urban citizenship, the right to difference and socio-spatial justice. Representations of participatory democracy, important to urban citizenship, are absent, as are the voices of people living with dementia. Through advocacy from others and a lens of citizenship, socio-spatial rights for people living with dementia, and in one instance carers, are recognised, in the context of dementia-awareness and dementia-friendly initiatives. While a lens of personhood constructs people living with dementia as historical and relational beings, a citizenship lens adds a spatial dimension.
Conclusions
Advocacy and the lenses of personhood and citizenship are important in creating positive constructions of people living with dementia, however, their participation in decision-making processes would confer an active citizenship status, and the inclusion of their authentic voices in media discourse would contribute to raising awareness towards rights-based dementia-friendly communities.
AdamsT. (1998). The discursive construction of dementia care: Implications for mental health nursing. Journal of advanced nursing, 28(3), 614–621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00693.x.
2.
AldenS.WigfieldA.KispeterE.KaraniaV. (2019). Changing the narrative: The role of frontline worker attitudes and beliefs in shaping dementia-friendly services in England. Disability & Society, 34(5), 775–796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1576506.
3.
ArgyleE.DeningT.BartlettP. (2017). Space, the final Frontier: Outdoor access for people living with dementia. Aging & Mental Health, 21(10), 1005–1006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2016.1222351.
4.
ArthursonK.LevinI.ZierschA. (2015). Social mix, ‘[A] very, very good idea in a vacuum but you have to do it properly!’ Exploring social mix in a right to the city framework. European journal of housing policy, 15(4), 418–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2015.1093748.
AustinA.O’NeillJ.Skevington (2016). Dementia, vulnerability and well-being: Living well with dementia together. A report from the University of Manchester for Age UK and the Manchester Institute of Collaborative Research on Ageing.
A walk to remember. (2015, 11 October). Bendigo advertiser.
9.
BaileyA.DeningT.HarveyK. (2019). Battles and breakthroughs: Representations of dementia in the British press. Ageing & Society, 41(2), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x19001120.
BartlettR.O'ConnorD. (2007). From personhood to citizenship: Broadening the lens for dementia practice and research. Journal of Aging Studies, 21(2), 107–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2006.09.002.
12.
BartlettR.O'ConnorD. (2010). Broadening the dementia debate: Towards social citizenship. Policy press.
13.
BeardR. L.KnaussJ.MoyerD. (2009). Managing disability and enjoying life: How we reframe dementia through personal narratives. Journal of Aging Studies, 23(4), 227–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2008.01.002.
14.
BehuniakS. (2011). The living dead? The construction of people with Alzheimer's disease as zombies. Ageing & Society, 31(1), 70–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x10000693.
15.
BenbowS. M.JolleyD. (2012). Dementia: Stigma and its effects. Neurodegenerative Disease Management, 2(2), 165–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt.12.7.
16.
BeyersB. (2015, 19 August). RSL filled with caring people. The McIvor Times.
17.
BiglieriS. (2018). Implementing dementia-friendly land use planning: An evaluation of current literature and financial implications for Greenfield development in Suburban Canada. Planning, practice & research, 33(3), 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2017.1379336.
18.
BirtL.PolandF.CsipkeE.CharlesworthG. (2017). Shifting dementia discourses from deficit to active citizenship. Sociology of Health & Illness, 39(2), 199–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12530.
19.
BlackmanT.MitchellL.BurtonE.JenksM.ParsonsM.RamanS.WilliamsK. (2003). The accessibility of public spaces for people with dementia: A new priority for the’ open city. Disability & Society, 18(3), 357–371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759032000052914.
20.
BrannellyT. (2011). Sustaining citizenship: People with dementia and the phenomenon of social death. Nursing Ethics, 18(5), 662–671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733011408049.
21.
BrannellyT. (2016). Citizenship and people living with dementia: A case for the ethics of care. Dementia, 15(3), 304–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301216639463.
22.
BrittainK.CornerL.RobinsonL.BondJ. (2010). Ageing in place and technologies of place: The lived experience of people with dementia in changing social, physical and technological environments. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(2), 272–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01203.x.
23.
BrondaniM. A. (2012). Teaching social responsibility through community service-learning in predoctoral dental education. Journal of Dental Education, 76(5), 609–619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2012.76.5.tb05295.x.
24.
BrookesG.HarveyK.ChadbornN.DeningT. (2018). Our biggest killer”: Multimodal discourse representations of dementia in the British press. Social semiotics, 28(3), 371–395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1345111.
25.
BrownA.KristiansenA. (2008). Urban policies and the right to the city. Human Rights.
26.
BucknerS.DarlingtonN.WoodwardM.BuswellM.MathieE.ArthurA.LafortuneL.KillettA.MayrhoferA.ThurmanJ.GoodmanC. (2019). Dementia friendly communities in England: A scoping study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 34(8), 1235–1243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5123.
27.
BuffelT.McGarryP.PhillipsonC.De DonderL.DuryS.De WitteN.SmetcorenA.-S.VertéD. (2016). Developing age-friendly cities: Case studies from brussels and manchester and implications for policy and practice. In Sánchez-GonzálezD.Rodríguez-RodríguezV. (Eds.), Environmental gerontology in Europe and Latin America: Policies and perspectives on environment and aging (pp. 277–296). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21419-1_15.
28.
ButlerC. (2012). Henri Lefebvre spatial politics, everyday life and the right to the city (Nomikoi). Routledge.
Care homes help to raise awareness. (2014, 19 September). Bendigo weekly, p. 4.
31.
CarlsonL. (2005). Docile bodies, docile minds: Foucauldian reflections on mental retardation. In TremainS. (Ed.), (pp. 133–152). The University of Michigan Press.
32.
CharrasK. (2020). Human rights, design and dementia: Moving towards an inclusive approach. In FlemingR.BennettK.ZeiselJ. (Eds.), World alzheimer report 2020: Design dignity dementia: Dementia-related design and the built environment (pp. 113–116). Alzheimer’s Disease International.
33.
ChaskinR. J.JosephM. L. (2013). 'Positive' gentrification, social control and the 'right to the city' in mixed-income communities: Uses and expectations of space and place. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(2), 480–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01158.x.
ClarkA. (2009). From neighbourhood to network: A review of the significance of neighbourhood in studies of social relations. Geography Compass, 3(4), 1559–1578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00249.x.
36.
ClarkeC. L.BaileyC. (2016). Narrative citizenship, resilience and inclusion with dementia: On the inside or on the outside of physical and social places. Dementia, 15(3), 434–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301216639736.
37.
ClarkeJ. (2006). The case of the missing person: Alzheimer's disease in mass print magazines 1991-2001. Health communication, 19(3), 269–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1903_9.
38.
Courtney-PrattH.MathisonK.DohertyK. (2018). Distilling authentic community-led strategies to support people with dementia to live well. Community Development, 49(4), 432–449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2018.1481443.
39.
CramptonJ.DeanJ.EleyR.ConsortiumA. (2012). Creating a dementia-friendly york. Joseph Rowntree Foundation York.
DearM.WiltonR.GaberS. L.TakahashiL. (1997). Seeing people differently: The sociospatial construction of disability. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15(4), 455–480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d150455.
DikeçM. (2001). Justice and the spatial imagination. Environment and planning A, 33(10), 1785–1805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a3467.
46.
DikeçM.GilbertL. (2002). Right to the city: Homage or a new societal ethics?Capitalism Nature Socialism, 13(2), 58–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10455750208565479.
47.
DukeJ. (2009). Mixed income housing policy and public housing residents’ right to the city. Critical social policy, 29(1), 100–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018308098396.
48.
Expert to Speak in Australia. (2017, 2 September). Bendigo advertiser, p. 31.
49.
FainsteinS. (2009). Planning and the just city. In MarcuseP.ConnollyJ.NovyJ.OlivoI.PotterC.SteilJ. (Eds.), Searching for the just city: Debates in urban theory and practice (pp. 19–39). Routledge.
50.
ForbesD.Ward-GriffinC.KloseckM.MendelsohnM.St-AmantO.DeForgeR.ClarkK. (2011). Her world gets smaller and smaller with nothing to look forward to” dimensions of social inclusion and exclusion among rural dementia care networks. Online Journal of Rural Nursing and Health Care, 11(2), 27–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14574/ojrnhc.v11i2.18.
51.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language (SmithA. S., Trans.). Pantheon.
GilbertL.DikeçM. (2008). Right to the city: Politics of citizenship. In GoonewardenaK.KipferS.MilgromR.SchmidC. (Eds.), Space, difference, everyday life: Reading Henri Lefebvre (pp. 250–263). Routledge.
55.
GodwinB.PolandF. (2015). Bedlam or bliss? Recognising the emotional self-experience of people with moderate to advanced dementia in residential and nursing care. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 16(4), 235–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QAOA-08-2015-0038.
GreenwoodN.MezeyG.SmithR. (2018). Social exclusion in adult informal carers: A systematic narrative review of the experiences of informal carers of people with dementia and mental illness. Maturitas, 112(2018), 39–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.03.011.
58.
HansenT. E.PraestegaardJ.Tjørnhøj-ThomsenT.AndresenM.NørgaardB. (2022). Dementia-friendliness in Danish and international contexts: A critical discourse analysis. The Gerontologist, 62(1), 130–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab056.
HarveyD. (2009). ‘Social justice and the city’ Geographies of justice and social transformation. University of Georgia Press.
61.
HebertC. A.ScalesK. (2019). Dementia friendly initiatives: A state of the science review. Dementia, 18(5), 1858–1895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301217731433.
62.
HellströmI. (2014). I’m his wife not his carer!’– Dignity and couplehood in dementia. In HydénH. L. J. B. L. C. (Ed.), Beyond loss: Dementia, identity, personhood (pp. 53–68). Oxford University Press.
63.
HughesB. (2005). What can a Foucauldian analysis contribute to disability theory. In TremainS. (Ed.), Foucault and the government of disability (pp. 78–92). University of Michigan Press.
InnesA. (2009). Dementia studies: A social science perspective. Sage.
66.
JabareenY. (2014). ‘The right to the city’revisited: Assessing urban rights–The case of Arab Cities in Israel. Habitat International, 41(2014), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.06.006.
KearneyM. (2016, 25 May). Call for dementia funding. Bendigo Advertiser.
69.
KelsonE.PhinneyA.LowryG. (2017). Social citizenship, public art and dementia: Walking the urban waterfront with Paul’s Club. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 4(1), 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2017.1354527.
70.
KeskitaloE. C. H. (2015). The role of discourse analysis in understanding spatial systems. In Handbook of the politics of the arctic (pp. 421–434). Edward Elgar Publishing.
KitwoodT. (1993). Person and process in dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 8(7), 541–545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.930080702.
KurianR.MenkeN.SantokhiS.TakT. (2019). Enabling social inclusion and urban citizenship of older adults through eHealth: The iZi project in the Hague. Social Inclusion, 7(4), 108–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i4.2343.
75.
LefebvreH. (1976). The survival of capitalism: Reproduction of the relations of production. Allison & Busby.
76.
LefebvreH. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.
77.
LefebvreH. (1996). The right to the city. In LebasE. K. E. (Ed.), Writings on cities. Blackwell.
78.
MacAndrewM.SchnitkerL.ShepherdN.BeattieE. (2018). People with dementia getting lost in Australia: Dementia-related missing person reports in the media. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 37(3), Article E97–E103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12542.
79.
MacDonaldF. (2017). Positioning young refugees in Australia: Media discourse and social exclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(11), 1182–1195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1350324.
McCombsM.FunkM. (2011). Shaping the agenda of local daily newspapers: A methodology merging the agenda setting and community structure perspectives. Mass Communication and Society, 14(6), 905–919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.615447.
82.
McLeanP. (2014, May 1). Show courage and reject euthanasia. Bendigo Advertiser.
83.
McParlandP.KellyF.InnesA. (2017). Dichotomising dementia: Is there another way?Sociology of Health & Illness, 39(2), 258–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12438.
MitchellD. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. Guilford Press.
87.
MitchellD.HeynenN. (2009). The geography of survival and the right to the city: Speculations on surveillance, legal innovation, and the criminalization of intervention. Urban Geography, 30(6), 611–632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.30.6.611.
88.
O’SheaE.WalshK. (2020). Key issues for people living wtih dementia living in rural Ireland: Social exclusion, models of care and policy change. In InnesA.MorganD. (Eds.), Remote and rural dementia care: Implications for research, policy and practice (pp. 127–148). Policy Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1198zhj.
89.
PeelE. (2014). ‘The living death of Alzheimer’s’ versus ‘take a walk to keep dementia at bay’: Representations of dementia in print media and carer discourse. Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(6), 885–901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12122.
90.
PerryJ. (2009). Diminished and fractured selves. In MathewsD. J. H.BokH.RabinsP. V. (Eds.), Personal identity and fractured selves: perspectives from philosophy, ethics, and neuroscience (pp. 129–162). JHU Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book.3352.
91.
PhillipsonL.HallD.CridlandE.FlemingR.Brennan-HorleyC.GuggisbergN.FrostD.HasanH. (2019 October-November). Involvement of people with dementia in raising awareness and changing attitudes in a dementia friendly community pilot project. Dementia, 18(7–8), 2679-2694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301218754455.
92.
PhinneyA.KelsonE.BaumbuschJ.O'ConnorD.PurvesB. (2016). Walking in the neighbourhood: Performing social citizenship in dementia. Dementia, 15(3), 381–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301216638180.
93.
PugalisL.GiddingsB. (2011). A renewed right to urban life: A twenty-first century engagement with lefebvre's initial “cry”. Architectural Theory Review, 16(3), 278–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2011.623785.
PurcellM. (2014). Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 141–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12034.
97.
RahbariL.SharepourM. (2015). Gender and realisation of women’s right to the City in Tehran. Asian Journal of Social Science, 43(3), 227–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685314-04303002.
98.
RevolC. (2014). English-speaking reception of ‘right to the city’: Transpositions and present meaning. In Erdi-LelandaisG. (Ed.), Understanding the city: Henri Lefebvre and urban studies. Cambridge Scholars.
99.
RoseN. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge university press.
100.
RossiA. S. (2001). Contemporary dialogue on civil society and social responsibility. In Caring and doing for others: Social responsibility in the domains of family, work, and community (pp. 3–72). The University of Chicago Press.
101.
RoweM. A.BennettV. (2003). A look at deaths occurring in persons with dementia lost in the community. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias®, 18(6), 343–348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/153331750301800612.
102.
SchillmeierM. (2016). Eventful bodies: The cosmopolitics of illness. Routledge.
103.
ŠestákováA.PlichtováJ. (2020). More than a medical condition: Qualitative analysis of media representations of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: Postdisciplinary humanities & social sciences quarterly. Human Affairs, 30(3), 382–398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2020-0033.
104.
ShannonK.BailK.NevilleS. (2019). Dementia-friendly community initiatives: An integrative review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(11–12), 2035–2045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14746.
105.
SharpL.RichardsonT. (2001). Reflections on Foucauldian discourse analysis in planning and environmental policy research. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 3(3), 193–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jepp.88.
106.
SiinerM. (2019). Let me grow old and senile in peace: Norwegian newspaper accounts of voice and agency with dementia. Ageing and Society, 39(5), 977–997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X17001374.
107.
SilvermanM. (2019). ‘We have different routes for different reasons’: Exploring the purpose of walks for carers of people with dementia. Dementia, 18(2), 630–643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301217699677.
108.
SojaE. (2009). The city and spatial justice. In BretB.Gervais-LambonyP.HancockC.LandyF. (Eds.), Justice et Injustices Spatiales, (pp. 56–72). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pupo.415.
SteeleL.SwafferK.PhillipsonL.FlemingR. (2019). Questioning segregation of people living with dementia in Australia: An international human rights approach to care homes. Laws, 8(3), 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws8030018.
SwafferK. (2020). Disability rights, enabling design and dementia. In FlemingR.BennettK.ZeiselJ. (Eds.), World alzheimer report 2020: Design dignity dementia: Dementia-related design and the built environment (Vol 1, pp. 117–118). Alzheimer’s Disease International.
113.
ThomasC.MilliganC. (2018). Dementia, disability rights and disablism: Understanding the social position of people living with dementia. Disability & Society, 33(1), 115–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1379952.
114.
TolhurstE.WeichtB.KingstonP. (2017). Narrative collisions, sociocultural pressures and dementia: The relational basis of personhood reconsidered. Sociology of Health & Illness, 39(2), 212–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12523.
115.
WernerP.KimS. (2021). A cross-national study of dementia stigma among the general public in Israel and Australia. Journal of Alzheimer’s disease, 83(1), 103–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-210277.
WilligC. (2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. McGraw-hill.
118.
WilsonE. (2006). Defining and measuring the outcomes of inclusive community for people with disability, their families and the communities with whom they engage. In From ideology to reality: Current issues in implementaltion of intellectual disability policy: Proceedings of the roundtable on intellectual disability policy, (pp. 24-33). School of Social Work and Social Policy, La Trobe University.
119.
WiltshireV. (2019). Remember to be dementia friendly. McIvor Times.
