While the marital relationship with partners with dementia has an impact on spousal carers’ well-being, the spousal understandings or expectations of their marital relationship have not been fully identified. As the marital relationship is formed by individual backgrounds including society, culture and psychological status, the aim of this study was to identify the experience of being the spouse of a person with dementia in the context of their marital relationship. The study was conducted in Japan.
Research Design
To identify spousal experience of being, Heideggerian perspectives of interpretive phenomenology were applied.
Study Sample
Seven couples aged over 65 years, each comprising one partner with dementia who received home nursing, and their spouse participated in this study.
Data Collection
The couples were observed, and semi-structured interviews were conducted.
Data Analysis
Interpretive data analysis based on the Hermeneutic circle of Heideggerian perspectives was applied.
Results
In the findings, the experience of being a spouse, contextualised by spousal understandings of marital relationship, was formed through seven themes. The main context for spousal understanding of their marital relationship was helping each other as husband and wife, and this relationship was seen as natural and unchanging. It reflected on spousal potentiality of being, that is, living together indefinitely as before. Spouses tried to provide suitable care for their partners using memories while preserving a sense of identity, maintaining external relationships and accepting unanticipated internal responsibility.
Conclusions
In conclusion, fulfilling unmet needs could help spouses to ease intense care load, which re-acknowledges their own and their partner’s identity, and their relationship by reminiscing their past.
AblittA.JonesG. V.MuersJ. (2009). Living with dementia: A systematic review of the influence of relationship factors. Aging & Mental Health, 13(4), 497–511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860902774436
2.
AoiK. (1974). Kazoku to ha nani ka [What is family?Kodansha.
ClarkS.PrescottT.MurphyG. (2019). The lived experiences of dementia in married couple relationships. Dementia- International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 18(5), 1727–1739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301217722034
6.
EgilstrodB.RavnM. B.PetersenK. S. (2019). Living with a partner with dementia: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of spouses’ lived experiences of changes in their everyday lives. Aging & Mental Health, 28(5), 541–550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1433634
FauthE.HessK.PiercyK.NortonM.CorcoranC.RabinsP.LyketsosC.TschanzJ. (2012). Caregivers’ relationship closeness with the person with dementia predicts both positive and negative outcomes for caregivers’ physical health and psychological well-being. Aging & Mental Health, 16(6), 699–711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2012.678482
9.
FletcherJ. R. (2020). Renegotiating relationships: Theorising shared experiences of dementia within the dyadic career. Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 19(3), 708–720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301218785511
10.
GreenwoodN.SmithR. (2019). Motivations for being informal carers of people living with dementia: A systematic review of qualitative literature. BMC Geriatrics, 19(1), 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1185-0
11.
GubaE. G. (1981). ERIC/ECTJ Annual review paper: Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology, 29(2), 75–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02766777
12.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
13.
HarrisS. M.AdamsM. S.ZubatskyM.WhiteM. (2011). A caregiver perspective of how Alzheimer's disease and related disorders affect couple intimacy. Aging & Mental Health, 15(8), 950–960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2011.583629
14.
HeideggerM. (1962). Being and time (MacquarrieJ.RobinsonE., Trans.). Harper Perennial & Modern Thought.
15.
HirakiN. (Ed), (1988). Kōza kazoku shinri’gaku 2: Otto to tsuma sono shinmitsuka to hatan [Family psychology: 2. Husband and wife – their intimacy and breakdown]. Kanekoshobo.
16.
HollowayI.WheelerS. (2010). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. Wiley-Blackwell.
17.
ItoY. (2015). A review of research on characteristics of intimacy in marital relationships. The Japanese Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26(4), 279–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11201/jjdp.26.279
18.
JohanssonM. F.McKeeK. J.DahlbergL.WilliamsC. L.Summer MeraniusM.HansonE.MagnussonL.EkmanB.Marmstål HammarL. (2021). A comparison of spouse and non-spouse carers of people with dementia: A descriptive analysis of Swedish national survey data. BMC Geriatrics, 21(1), 338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02264-0
19.
KajiN. (1994). Chinmoku no shūkyō: Jyukyō [Religion of silence: Confucianism]. Chikumashobo.
KunickiZ. J.GaudianoB. A.MillerI. W.TremontG.SallowayS.DarlingE.BroughtonM. K.KrainesM. A.HoopesR.Epstein-LubowG. (2021). Differences in burden severity in adult-child family caregivers and spousal caregivers of persons with dementia. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 64(5), 518–532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2021.1912242
22.
LeonardW. V (1994). A Heideggerian phenomenological perspective on the concept of person. In BennerP. (Ed.), Interpretive phenomenology: Embodiment, caring, and ethics in health and illness (pp. 43–64). Sage Publications.
23.
LindezaP.RodriguesM.CostaJ.GuerreiroM.RosaM. M. (2020). Impact of dementia on informal care: A systematic review of family caregivers’ perceptions. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002242
24.
MacdonaldM.Martin-MisenerR.WeeksL.HelwigM.MoodyE.MacLeanH. (2021). Experiences and perceptions of spousal/partner caregivers providing care for community-dwelling adults with dementia: A qualitative systematic review. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 19(4), 1–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2017-003774
NolanM.GrantG.KeadyJ.LundhU. (2003). New directions for partnerships: Relationship-centred care. In NolanM.LundhU.GrantG.KeadyJ. (Eds.), Partnerships in family care: Understanding the caregiving career (pp. 257–291). Open University Press.
28.
O'ShaughnessyM.LeeK.LinternT. (2010). Changes in the couple relationship in dementia care: Spouse carers’ experiences. Dementia, 9(2), 237–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301209354021
29.
PackerM. J.AddisonR. B. (1989). Evaluating an interpretive account. In PackerM. J.AddisonR. B. (Eds.), Entering the circle (pp. 275–292). State University of New York Press.
30.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T. (2010). Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(11), 1451–1458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004
31.
PozzebonM.DouglasJ.AmesD. (2016). Spouses’ experience of living with a partner diagnosed with a dementia: A synthesis of the qualitative research. International Psychogeriatrics, 28(4), 537–556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610215002239
32.
QuinnC.ClareL.WoodsB. (2009). The impact of the quality of relationship on the experiences and wellbeing of caregivers of people with dementia: A systematic review. Aging & Mental Health, 13(2), 143–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860802459799
33.
RodgersB. L.CowlesK. V. (1993). The qualitative research audit trail: A complex collection of documentation. Research in Nursing & Health, 16(3), 219–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770160309
34.
RykkjeL.TranvagO. (2019). Caring for one’s wife with dementia-at home: Older husbands’ experiences with managing challenges of everyday life. SAGE OPEN, 9(1), 215824401983445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019834453
