The Visit, an immersive participatory artwork (viewed on a screen or virtual reality headset), was produced as part of a research programme investigating the subjective experience of dementia and the relational dynamic between people with dementia and others. It invites viewers to engage with a digital human character, ‘Viv’, as she shares her experiences of living with dementia. The experiences that Viv recounts are based on verbatim accounts from in-depth interviews with four women living with dementia. The artwork was designed with the combined aim of generating insights into the lived experience of dementia and establishing conditions under which viewers might cultivate empathy for the character portrayed. Viewers engaging with Viv were invited to complete pre- and post-engagement measures of state empathy alongside an assessment of emotional distance. State empathy was significantly greater after engaging with The Visit, and correspondingly, there was a significant decrease in emotional distance (aversion), suggesting that the aims were met.
AhnS.J.LeA.M.BailensonJ. (2013). ‘The effect of embodied experiences on self-other merging, attitude, and helping behavior’. Media Psychology, 16(1), pp. 7-38.
2.
Alzheimers research UK, & Visyon (2016). A walk through dementia [Immersive media]. Alzheimers research UK.
3.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS. (2004). ‘The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences’. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, pp. 163-175.
4.
BatschN.L.MittelmanM.S. (2012). World Alzheimer report (2012). Overcoming the stigma of dementia. Alzheimer’s Disease International.
5.
BatsonC. D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In DecetyJ.IckesW. J. (Eds.). The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3-15). MIT Press.
6.
BatsonC.D.DyckJ.L.BrandtJ.R.BatsonJ.G.PowellA.L., et al. (1988). ‘Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55:1, pp. 52-77.
7.
BatsonC.D.PolycarpouM.P.Harmon-JonesE.ImhoffH.J.MitchenerE.C., et al. (1997). ‘Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group?’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72:1, pp.105-118.
8.
BennettJ. (2005). Empathic vision: Affect, trauma and contemporary art. Stanford University Press.
9.
BennettJ.FroggettL.MullerL. (2019). ‘Psychosocial aesthetics and the art of lived experience’, Journal of Psychosocial Studies, 12:1–2, pp. 185-201.
BotwinickJ. (1977). ‘Intellectual abilities’. in BirrenJ. E.SchaieK. W. (eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, pp. 580-605. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
14.
BrinckI. (2018). Empathy, engagement, entertainment: The interaction dynamics of aesthetics experience. Cognitive processing, 19(2), 201-213.
15.
CresswellJ. W. (2013). Research design (International student edition): Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
16.
CuddyA.FiskeS. (2002). ‘Doddering but dear: Process, content, and function in stereotyping of older persons. in NelsonT. (ed.), Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. MIT Press, pp. 3-26.
17.
DavisM.H. (2006) Empathy. In: StetsJ.E.TurnerJ.H. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer.
18.
DavisM.H.ConklinL.SmithA.LuceC. (1996). ‘Effects of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70:4, pp.713-726.
Dementia Australia (2016a). Dementia-friendly home app [app]. ACT, Australia.
21.
Dementia Australia (2016b). EDIE [virtual reality smartphone app]. ACT, Australia.
22.
Dementia Australia (2016c). Virtual Forest [immersive environment]. ACT, Australia.
23.
ErberJ.T.SzuchmanL.T.RothbergS.T. (1990). ‘Everyday memory failure: Age differences in appraisal and attribution’. Psychology and Aging, 5:2, pp. 236-241.
24.
GalinskyA.D.MoskowitzG.B. (2000). ‘Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78:4, pp. 708-724.
25.
GibsonJ. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
26.
HarveyM. (2002). ‘Neuropsychological assessment of Individuals with dual diagnosis’. The NADD Bulletin, 5:2, pp. 22-26.
27.
HarwoodJ.JoyceN.ChenC.Y.PaoliniS.XiangJ., et al. (2015). ‘Effects of past and present intergroup communication on perceived fit of an outgroup member and desire for future intergroup contact’. Communication Research, 44:4, pp. 530-555.
28.
HerreraF.BailensonJ.WeiszE.OgleE.ZakiJ. (2018). ‘Building long-term empathy: A large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking. PLoS ONE, 13:10.
29.
HoffmanM.L. (2001). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press.
30.
Levett-JonesT.LapkinS.GovindN.PichJ.HoffmanK., et al. (2017). ‘Measuring the impact of a ‘point of view’ disability simulation on nursing students’ empathy using the comprehensive state empathy scale’. Nurse Education Today, 59, pp. 75-81.
31.
MainA.WalleE. A.KhoC.HalpernJ. (2017). The interpersonal functions of empathy: A relational perspective. Emotion review, 9(4), 358-366. doi:10.1177/1754073916669440
32.
McCallisterM.Levitt JonesT.DownerT.HarrisonP.HarveyT., et al. (2013). ‘Snapshots of simulation: Creative strategies used by Australian educators to enhance simulation learning experiences for nursing students’. Nurse Education in Practice, 13, pp. 567-572.
NashK. (2018). ‘Virtual reality witness: Exploring the ethics of mediated presence. Studies in Documentary Film, 12, 2.
36.
OhS.Y.BailensonJWeiszEZakiJ. (2016). ‘Virtually old: embodied perspective taking and the reduction of ageism under threat’. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, pp. 398-410.
37.
PhillipsonL.MageeC.JonesS. C.ReisS.SkladzienE. (2011). ‘Dementia, stigma and intentions to help-seek: A pilot study of Australian adults 40 to 65 years’. Alzheimer's Australia 14th national conference Alzheimer's Australia, Brisbane, Australia.
38.
RogersC.R. (1957). ‘The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change’. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, pp. 95-103.
39.
RogersC.R. (1959). ‘A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered framework’. in KochS. (ed.), Psychology: A study of a science, vol. III. Formulations of the person and the social context. McGraw-Hill, pp.184-256.
40.
The Visit2019 (From the Confabulations project), The Big Anxiety 2019 – festival of arts + Science + people. https://www.thebiganxiety.org/events/feel/. Accessed 2 December 2019.
41.
WardA.MandrusiakA.Levett-JonesT. (2018). ‘Cultural empathy in physiotherapy students: A pre-test post-test study utilising virtual simulation’. Physiotherapy, 104:4, pp. 453-461.
