This article discusses the results of a content and critical discourse analysis of Canadian federal policy documentation relating to the development of a national Canadian dementia strategy. These documents span from 2013 and focus upon Canadian federal policy directives and directions up to the release, and including the release, of a national strategy in June 2019. The analyses, supplemented by a subtextual examination of these documents guided by Bacchi's (2012) “What's the Problem Represented to be?” framework, focuses upon the treatment of gender in policy documentation and the specific gender related policy framework, known as GBA+ (gender-based analysis and intersectionality), which is intended to bring about health equity to disadvantaged groups. As women, particularly, working class women and their carers, as well as women with additional intersecting factors, such as being lesbian or bisexual, are less likely to receive the dementia related care and services they need, precipitating a premature move to residential care, GBA+ is an essential policy framework in the attempt to address these inequities. However, findings point to a superficial treatment of gender, GBA and GBA+ in federal policy documents and lack a meaningful invocation of women's gendered and intersectional lived experiences of dementia. Additionally, the Canadian federal government's Dementia Strategy for Canada: Together We Aspire (2019) is grounded in a rendition of citizenship that do not work to unearth the complex relationships between citizenship, old age, gender and intersectional factors. As a result, the Dementia Strategy for Canada: Together We Aspire (2019) presents a version of citizenship that homogenizes older adults and prevents representations of older adults as diverse, complex and continually changing groupings. Therefore, inspired by Bartlett et al. (2018), I advocate for the application of a feminist and intersectional citizenship lens in Canadian federal dementia-related policymaking documentation going forward.
AbramsonB. (2009). Women and health: Taking the matter to heart. In Women’s health: Intersections of policy, research and practice. Pat Armstrong, and Jennifer Deadman (pp. 53–60). Women’s Press.
2.
Abu-LughodL. (2008[1993]). Writing women’s worlds: Bedouin stories. University of California Press.
3.
Alzheimer Society of Canada. (2010). Rising tide: The impact of dementia on Canadian society. Author.
4.
BacchiC. (2012). Introducing the ‘What’s the problem represented to be? approach. In BletsasA.BeasleyC. (Eds.), Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic interventions & exchanges. University of Adelaide Press.
5.
BartlettR.GjernesT.LotheringtonA.-T.ObstefelderA. (2018). Gender, citizenship and dementia care: A scoping review of studies to inform policy and future research. Health & Social Care in the Community, 26(1), 14–26.
6.
BeamanJ.. (2016). Citizenship as cultural: Towards a theory of cultural citizenship. Sociology Compass, 10, 849–857.
7.
BenedictR. (1959). Patterns of culture. Houghton Mifflin Company.
8.
BlomkampE. (2018). The promise of co-design for public policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(4), 729–743.
9.
BoasF. (1911). Handbook of American Indian languages. Government Printing Office.
10.
BoasF. (1927). Primitive art. Harvard University Press.
11.
BrodaA.BieberA.MeyerG.HopperL.JoyceR.IrvingK.ZanettiO.PortolaniE.KerpershoekL.VerheyF.de VugtM.WolfsC.EriksenS.RosvikJ.MarquesM.Goncalves-PereiraM.SjolundB.WoodsB.JellyH., … the ActifCare Consortium. (2017). Perspectives of policy and political decision makers on access to formal dementia care: Expert interviews in eight European countries. BMC Health Services Research, 17, 518.
12.
ButlerJ. (2004). Introduction: Acting in concert. In Undoing gender (pp. 1–16). Routledge.
13.
BynumJ. P. W. (2014). The long reach of Alzheimer’s disease: Patients, practice, and policy. Health Affairs, 33, 534–540.
14.
CairneyP. (2012). Understanding public policy: Theories and issues. Palgrave MacMillan.
15.
CallonM.LatourB. (1981). Unscrewing the big leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them do so. In Knorr-CerinaK.CicourelA.V. (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: toward an integration of micro – and macro-sociologists. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
16.
ChowS.ChowR.WanA.LamH. R.TaylorK.BoninK.RowbottomL.LamH.DeAngelisC.HerrmannN. (2018). National dementia strategies: What should Canada learn?Canadian Geriatrics Journal, 21(2), 173–209.
17.
ChundamalaJ.MatsuoT.PengI. (2009). Older immigrant women’s health: From triple Jeopardy to cultural competency. In ArmstrongP.DeadmanJ. (Eds.), Women’s health: Intersections of policy, research and practice (pp. 91–118). Women’s Press.
18.
CoburnD. (2010). Chapter 3: Health and health care: A political economy perspective. In BryantT.RaphaelD.RiouxM. (Eds.), Staying alive. Canadian Scholars’ Press and Women’s Press.
19.
Di LeonardoM. (1998). Exotics at home: Anthropologies, others, American modernity. The University of Chicago Press.
20.
Dion StoutM. (2009). Healthy living and aboriginal women: The tension between hard evidence and soft logic. In ArmstrongP.DeadmanJ. (Eds.), Women’s health: Intersections of policy, research and practice (pp. 79–90). Women’s Press.
21.
DitchburnJ. (2015). Because it’s 2015: Trudeau forms Canada’s 1st gender-balanced Cabinet. The Canadian Press.
22.
DixonJ.LaingJ.ValentineC. (2018). A human rights approach to advocacy for people with dementia: A review of current provisions in England and Wales. Dementia0(0), 1–16.
23.
DouglasM. (2002[1966]). Purity and danger. Routledge.
24.
EdickC.HollandN.AshbourneJ.ElliottJ.StoleeP. (2017). A review of Canadian and international dementia strategies. Healthcare Management Forum, 30(1), 32–39.
25.
EloS.KyngäsH. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.
26.
MerryS. E. (2006). Transnational Human rights and local activism: Mapping the middle. American Anthropologist, 108(1), 38–51.
27.
ErrolR.BookerD.PeelE. (2015, June). Women and dementia: A global review. Alzheimer Disease International.
28.
FoucaultM. (1989[1969]). The Archaeology of knowledge. Routledge.
29.
FoucaultM. (1994). Genealogy and social criticism. In SeidmanS. (Ed.), The postmodern turn: New perspectives on social theory. Cambridge University Press.
30.
G8UK – United Kingdom. (2013). G8 dementia summit declaration. G8 UK United Kingdom 2013 Office.
31.
GajardoJ.AravenaJ.BudinichM.LarrainA.FuentesP.GitlinL. (2017). The Kintun program for families with dementia: From novel experiment to national policy (innovative practice). Dementia0(0), 1–8.
32.
GilliardJ.MeansR.BeattieA.Daker-WhiteG. (2005). Dementia care in England and the social model of disability. Dementia, 4(4), 571–586.
33.
Government of Canada. (2014) National dementia research and prevention plan. Author.
34.
Government of Canada. (2015) Status of women Canada, privy council office and treasury board of Canada secretariat action plan (2016-2020) audit of gender-based analysis fall 2015 report of the auditor general of Canada. Accessed November 30, 2019 at:https://cfc-swc.gc.ca/gba-acs/plan-action-2016-en.PDF
35.
Government of Canada. (2016a) Dementia in Canada: A national strategy for dementia-friendly communities. In Standing senate committee on social affairs, science and technology. Author.
36.
Government of Canada. (2016b) Status of women Canada, Privy Council office and Treasury Board of Canada secretariat action plan (2016-2020) Audit of gender-based analysis fall 2015 report of the Auditor General of Canada. Author. Available at:https://swc-cfc.gc.ca/gba-acs/plan-action-2016-en.PDF
37.
Government of Canada. (2017a) Bill – 233 – an act respecting a national strategy for Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Author.
GreavesL. (2009). Women, gender, and health research. In ArmstrongP.DeadmanJ. (Eds.), Women’s health: Intersections of policy, research and practice (pp. 3–20). Women’s Press.
44.
HallS. (1992) The west and the rest. In HallS.GiebenB. (Eds.), Formations of modernity. Policy Press/The Open University.
45.
HallS. (1997). The Work of representation. In HallS. (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 13–74). Sage, in Association with Open University.
46.
HankivskyO. (2012). The Lexicon of mainstreaming equality: Gender based analysis (gba), gender and diversity analysis (gda) and intersectionality based analysis (iba). Canadian Political Science Review, 6(2-3), 171–183.
47.
HankivskyO.CormierR. (2009). Intersectionality: Moving women’s health research and policy forward. Women’s Health Research Network of BC.
48.
HarawayD. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
49.
Health Canada. (2000). Health Canada’s gender-based analysis policy. Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada.
Health Canada. (2003b) Exploring concepts of gender and health. Women’s Health Bureau.
52.
HennellyN.O’SheaE. (2017). Personhood, dementia policy and the Irish national dementia strategy. Dementia, 0(0), 1–16.
53.
HenryF.TatorC. (2002). The methodology of case studies and critical discourse analysis. In Media culture: Culture studies, identities and politics between the modern and post-modern (pp. 71–77). Routledge.
54.
HiggsP. (1995). Citizenship and old age: The end of the road?Ageing and Society, 15, 535–550.
55.
HoffmanD. (2014). Alzheimer’s disease legislation and policy-now and in the future. Health Affairs, 33, 561–565.
56.
HulkoW. (2002). Making the links: Social theories, experiences with dementia and intersectionality. In LeibingA.ScheinkmanL. (Eds.), The diversity of alzheimer’s disease: Different approaches and contexts (pp. 231–264). CUCA-IPUB.
57.
HulkoW. (2007). From ‘not a big deal’ to ‘hellish’: Experiences of older people with dementia. Journal of Aging Studies, 23, 131–144.
58.
InnesA.ManthorpeJ. (2012). Developing theoretical understandings of dementia and their application to dementia care policy in the UK. Dementia, 12(6), 682–696.
59.
JacksonB.PedersonA.BoscoeM. (2009). Waiting to wait: Improving wait times evidence through gender-based analysis. In ArmstrongP.DeadmanJ. (Eds.), Women’s health: Intersections of policy, research and practice (pp. 35–51). Women’s Press.
60.
JhallyS. (1997). Stuart hall: Representation and the media. Media Education Foundation.
61.
KochT.IliffeS. (2011). Implementing the national dementia strategy in England: evaluating innovative practices using a case study methodology. Dementia, 10(4), 487–498.
62.
KontosP.MartinW.. (2013). Embodiment and dementia: Exploring critical narratives of selfhood, surveillance, and dementia care. Dementia, 12, 3, 288–302.
63.
KontosP. C. (2005). Embodied selfhood in alzheimer’s disease. Dementia, 4(4), 553–570.
64.
KontosP. C.NaglieG. (2007) Bridging theory and practice. Dementia, 6(4), 549–569.
65.
KontosP. C.NaglieG. (2009). Tacit knowledge of caring and embodied selfhood. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(5), 688–704.
66.
LeipertB.SmithJ.. (2009). Using photovoice to explore rural older women’s health promotion needs and resources. In ArmstrongP.DeadmanJ. (Eds.), Women’s health: Intersections of policy, research and practice (pp. 135–150). Women’s Press.
67.
LeissW.KlineS.JhallyS. (1990). Two approaches to the study of ads. Social communication in advertising (pp. 197–224). Nelson.
68.
LieblichATuval-MashiachR.ZilberT. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis and interpretation. Sage Publications.
69.
LinS.-Y.LewisF. M. (2015). Dementia friendly, dementia capable, and dementia positive: Concepts to prepare for the future. The Gerontologist, 55(2), 237–244.
70.
LockM. (2013). The Alzheimer’s conundrum: Entanglements of dementia and aging. Princeton University Press.
71.
LuptonD. (2011). Medicine as culture (2nd ed). Sage.
72.
MosselloE.CaleriV.RazziE.Di BariM.CantiniC.TononE.LopilatoE.MariniM.SimoniD.CavalliniM. C.MarchionniN.BiaginiC. A.MasottiG. (2008). Day care for older dementia patients: Favorable effects on behavioral and psychological symptoms and caregiver stress. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 23, 1066–1072.
73.
Native Women’s Association of Canada. (2007). Culturally relevant gender based analysis: An issue paper. National Aboriginal Women’s Summit.
74.
OrtnerS. (1974). Is female to male as nature is to culture? In RosaldoM.LamphereL. (Eds.), Women, culture & society: An overview (pp. 67–87). Stanford University Press.
75.
O’SullivanT.AmaratungaC. (2009). Women in the response community: Gendered impacts of bio-disasters. In ArmstrongP.DeadmanJ. (Eds.), Women’s health: Intersections of policy, research and practice (pp. 217–231). Women’s Press.
76.
PeelE.HardingR., (2014). ‘It’s a huge maze, the system, it’s a terrible maze’: Dementia carers’ constructions of navigating health and social care services. Dementia (London, England), 13(5), 642–661.
77.
RaphaelD. (2010). Chapter 6: Social determinants of health: An overview of concepts and issues. In BryantT.RaphaelD.RiouxM. (Eds.), Staying alive. Canadian Scholars' Press and Women’s Press.
78.
RaphaelD. (2015) The political economy of health: A research agenda for addressing health inequalities in Canada. Canadian Public Policy41(Suppl. 2), S17–S25.
79.
RosaldoM. (1974). Women, culture, and society: A theoretical overview. In RosaldoM.LamphereL. (Eds.), Women, culture & society: An overview (pp. 17–42). Stanford University Press.
80.
SandbergL. J. (2018). Dementia and the gender trouble?: Theorising dementia, gendered subjectivity and embodiment. Journal of Aging Studies, 45, 25–31.
81.
SandersE. (2014). Perspectives on participation in design. In MareisC.HeldM.JoostG. (Eds.), Wer gestalt die Gestaltung? Praxis, Theorie und Geschichte des partizipatorischen designs (pp. 61–75). Transcript Verlag.
82.
Santiago-IrizarryV. (2001). Medicalizing ethnicity: the construction of latino identity in a psychiatric setting. Cornell University Press.
83.
Scheper-HughesN. (1999). Nervoso: Medicine, sickness, and human needs. In SamsonC. (Ed.), Health studies: A critical and cross-cultural reader (pp. 338–363). Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
84.
ScottC.ThurstonW. (2009). Women and a fair income: Knowledge into action. In ArmstrongP.DeadmanJ. (Eds.), Women’s health: Intersections of policy, research and practice (pp. 263–272). Women’s Press.
85.
SmebyeK.KirkevoldM. (2013). The influence of relationships on personhood in dementia care: A qualitative, hermeneutic study. BMC Nursing, 12, 39.
86.
SmebyeK.KirkevoldM.EngedalK. (2012) How do persons with dementia participate in decision-making related to health and daily care? A multi-case study. BMC Health Services Research, 12, 241.
87.
SmebyeK.KirkevoldM.EngedalK. (2016). Ethical dilemmas concerning autonomy when persons with dementia wish to live at home: A qualitative, hermeneutic study. BMC Health Services Research, 16, 21.
TsingA. (1993). In the realm of the diamond queen: Marginality in an out-of-the-way place. Princeton University Press.
90.
TudiverS. (2009). Integrating women’s health and gender analysis in a government context: Reflections on a work in progress. In ArmstrongP.DeadmanJ. (Eds.), Women’s health: Intersections of policy, research and practice (pp. 21–34). Women’s Press.
VisweswaranK. (1994). Fictions of feminist ethnography. University of Minnesota Press.
93.
WeedE.ButlerJ. (2011). Introduction. In ButlerJ.WeedE. (Eds.), The question of gender: Joan W. Scott’s critical feminism (pp. 1–8). Indiana University Press.
94.
WestwoodS.. (2016). Dementia, women and sexuality: how the intersection of ageing, gender and sexuality magnify dementia concerns among lesbian and bisexual women. Dementia, 15(6), 1494–1514.
95.
WhitehouseP. J.Vella BurrowsT.StephensonD. (2018). Global perspectives on dementia and art: An international discussion about changing public health policy. Dementia, 17(6), 785–797.
96.
World Health Organization. (2012). Dementia: A public health priority. Author.
