The use of robot companion pets for people in care homes has been extensively studied. The results are largely positive and suggest that they are valuable in enhancing wellbeing, communication and behavioural aspects. However, there has been little research in people’s own homes, possibly due to the cost and complexity of some of the robot pets currently available. As dementia affects people in different ways, this study explores the effects of a robot cat for people in their own homes, without specifically investigating the effects on a particular symptom. We utilised a case study design to investigate the proposition that various factors influence the impact of a robot cat on the person living with dementia and their carer, including acceptability of the robot pet and acceptance of dementia and its symptoms. The qualitative analysis explores the similarities and differences within the data which were gathered during interviews with people with dementia and their families. This analysis revealed four themes: Distraction, Communication, Acceptance and rejection, and Connecting with the cat and connecting with others. These themes were synthesised into two overarching themes: the effect of the cat on mood and behaviour, and The interaction with the cat. We present the acceptability and impact of the robot cat on symptoms of dementia, with data presented across and within the group of participants. Our analysis suggests that benefits of the robot pet were evident, and although this was a small-scale study, where they were accepted, robot pets provided positive outcomes for the participants and their families.
AbdiJ.Al-HindawiA.NgT.VizcaychipiM. P. (2018). Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open, 8(2), e018815. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018815
BernabeiV.De RonchiD.La FerlaT.MorettiF.TonelliL.FerrariB.ForlaniM.AttiA. R. (2013). Animal-assisted interventions for elderly patients affected by dementia or psychiatric disorders: A review. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 47(6), 762–773.
4.
BroekensJ.HeerinkM.RosendalH. (2009). Assistive social robots in elderly care: A review. Gerontechnology, 8(2), 94–103.
5.
BrooksH. L.RushtonK.LovellK.BeeP.WalkerL.GrantL.RogersA. (2018). The power of support from companion animals for people living with mental health problems: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1), 31–12.
6.
BurtonA. (2013). Dolphins, dogs, and robot seals for the treatment of neurological disease. The Lancet. Neurology, 12(9), 851–852.
7.
ChangW.-L.ŠabanovićS.HuberL. (2013, March). Use of seal-like robot PARO in sensory group therapy for older adults with dementia. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI ‘13), Tokyo, Japan (pp. 101–102). IEEE Press.
8.
CherniakE. P.CherniakA. R. (2014). The benefits of pets and animal assisted therapy to the health of older individuals. Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research, 2014, 623203. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/623203
9.
ChmiliarL. (2010). Multiple-case designs. In MillsA. J.DureposG.WiebeE. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research. SAGE Publications, Inc.
10.
ChoK.KwonJ.ShinD. (2009). Trends of cognitive robot-based intervention for autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Korean Association for Person with Autism, 9(2), 45–60.
11.
DalibardS.Magnenat-TalmannN.ThalmannD. (2012, May). Anthropomorphism of artificial agents: A comparative survey of expressive design and motion of virtual characters and social robots. In Workshop on autonomous social robots and virtual humans at the 25th annual conference on computer animation and social agents (CASA 2012), Singapore, Singapore.
12.
DautenhahnK. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 679–704.
13.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (1998). Strategies of qualitative enquiry. Sage Publications.
14.
FarinaN.PageT. E.DaleyS.BrownA.BowlingA.BassetT.LivingstonG.KnappM.MurrayJ.BanerjeeS. (2017). Factors associated with the quality of life of family carers of people with dementia: A systematic review.Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association, 13(5), 572–581.
15.
Feil-SeiferD.MataricM. J. (2008, August 1–3). B3IA: A control architecture for autonomous robot-assisted behavior intervention for children with autism spectrum disorders. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE international symposium of robot human interaction and communication, Munich, Germany.
16.
GlawX.InderK.KableA.HazeltonM. (2017). Visual methodologies in qualitative research: Autophotography and photo elicitation applied to mental health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691774821.
17.
GustafssonC.SvanbergC.MüllersdorfM. (2015). Using a robotic cat in dementia care: A pilot study. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 41(10), 46–56.
18.
Grimshaw, M. “The audio Uncanny Valley: Sound, fear and the horror game.” (2009). Games Computing and Creative Technologies: Conference Papers (Peer-Reviewed). Paper 9. http://digitalcommons.bolton.ac.uk/gcct_conferencepr/9
19.
HeideggerM. (1962). Being and Time. Macquarrie, J. & Robinson, E. (Transl.). Blackwell Ltd.
20.
JøransonN.PedersenI.RokstadA. M. M.IhlebækC. (2015). Effects on symptoms of agitation and depression in persons with dementia participating in robot-assisted activity: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 16(10), 867–873.
21.
JungM. M.Van der LeijL.KeldersS. M. (2017). An exploration of the benefits of an animallike robot companion with more advanced touch interaction capabilities for dementia care. Frontiers in Ict, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2017.00016
22.
KachouieR.SedighadeliS.KhoslaR.ChuM.-T. (2014). Socially assistive robots in elderly care: A mixed-method systematic literature review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(5), 369–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.873278
23.
KiddC. D.TaggartW.TurkleS. (2006). A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly. In Proceedings 2006 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, ICRA 2006 (pp. 3972–3976). IEEE.
24.
KimK. H.LeeH. S.JangS. J.KuH. J. (2010). The reaction of children labeled with autism through interactions with robot. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 26(1), 331–353.
25.
LibinA.Cohen-MansfieldJ. (2004). Therapeutic robocat for nursing home residents with dementia: Preliminary inquiry. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementiasr, 19(2), 111–116.
26.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
27.
McNicholasJ.GilbeyA.RennieA.AhmedzaiS.DonoJ. A.OrmerodE. (2005). Pet ownership and human health: A brief review of evidence and issues. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 331(7527), 1252–1254.
28.
MendesA. (2016). Animal-assisted therapy for people living with dementia. Nursing and Residential Care, 18(4), 214–216.
29.
MengoniS. E.IrvineK.ThakurD.BartonG.DautenhahnK.GuldbergK.RobinsB.WellstedD.SharmaS. (2017). Feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of using a humanoid robot to improve the social skills of children with autism spectrum disorder (Kaspar RCT): A study protocol. BMJ Open, 7(6), e017376. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017376
30.
MoriM.MacDormanK.KagekiN. (Transl.) (2012). The Uncanny Valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19(2), 98–100.
31.
MoyleW.BeattieE.DraperB.ShumD.ThalibL.JonesC. O.DwyerS.MervinC. (2015). Effect of an interactive therapeutic robotic animal on engagement, mood states, agitation and psychotropic drug use in people with dementia: A cluster-randomised controlled trial protocol. BMJ Open, 5(8), e009097. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009097
32.
MoyleW.CookeM.BeattieE.JonesC.KleinB.CookG.GrayC. (2013). Exploring the effect of companion robots on emotional expression in older adults with dementia: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 39(5), 46–53.
33.
MurrayL.NashM. (2017). The challenges of participant photography: A critical reflection on methodology and ethics in two cultural contexts. Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 923–937.
34.
NalinM.BaroniI.SannaA.PozziC. (2012). Robotic companion for diabetic children: Emotional and educational support to diabetic children, through an interactive robot. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on interaction design and children (IDC ‘12), New York, NY, USA (pp. 260–263). ACM.
35.
PeacockJ. L. (2001). The anthropological lens: Harsh light, soft focus (2nd ed).Cambridge University Press.
36.
PickingR.PikeJ. (2017). Exploring the effects of interaction with a robot cat for dementia sufferers and their carers. In Proceedings of 7th international conference on internet technologies and applications (ITA 17), Wrexham, UK (pp. 209–10). IEEE.
37.
RabbittS. M.KazdinA. E.ScassellatiB. (2015). Integrating socially assistive robotics into mental healthcare interventions: Applications and recommendations for expanded use. Clinical Psychology Review, 35, 35–46.
38.
RobinsonH.MacdonaldB.KerseN.BroadbentE. (2013). The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 14(9), 661–667.
39.
ShibataT. (2012). Therapeutic seal robot as biofeedback medical device: Qualitative and quantitative evaluations of robot therapy in dementia care. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(8), 2527–2538.
40.
SparrowR.SparrowL. (2006). In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds and Machines, 16(2), 141–161.
41.
StakeR. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Sage.
42.
StakeR. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Publications.
43.
SvendsboeE. J.TestadI.TerumT.JörgA.CorbettA.AarslandD.RongveA. (2018). Patterns of carer distress over time in mild dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 33(7), 987–993. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4882
44.
TanakaM.IshiiA.YamanoE.OgikuboH.OkazakiM.KamimuraK.KonishiY.EmotoS.WatanabeY. (2012). Effect of a human-type communication robot on cognitive function in elderly women living alone. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, 18(9), CR550–CR557.
45.
WadaK.ShibataT. (2007). Social effects of robot therapy in a care house – Change of social network of the residents for two months. In Proceedings – IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Japan, 23 (pp. 1250–1255). IEEE.
46.
WinnerS. F. (2014). Positive effect of pets on memory-impaired residents at Silverado communities. Working with Older People, 18(3), 134–114.
47.
YazanB. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134–152.
