Individuals with dementia may appear before the courts in different roles. Despite the growing interest in the rights of older persons with dementia, relatively little empirical data exist regarding their actual interactions and experiences in court.
Methods
This study used a qualitative, textual analysis methodology. A total of 281 Israeli legal court cases, which addressed issues relating to dementia, were analyzed.
Results
Four key themes were found in the legal texts: (1) The legal construction of dementia and its relationships to old age; (2) The importance of procedural justice; (3) The implications and outcomes of the legal process; and (4) The legal implications to the society as a whole.
Conclusions
The legal narratives, which surround legal cases that deal with dementia in Israel, reveal an internal tension between stigmatic and anti-stigmatic narratives. This complex reality raises the need for further research and for a clearer judicial policy.
BergerR. (2015).
Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research,
15(2), 219–234. DOI: 10.1177/1468794112468475.
2.
BoyleG. (2008).
The Mental Capacity Act 2005: Promoting the citizenship of people with dementia?Health and Social Care in the Community,
16(5), 529–537. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00775.x.
3.
BoyleG. (2010).
Social policy for people with dementia in England: Promoting human rights?Health and Social Care in the Community,
18(5), 511–519. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00928.x.
4.
BregmanN.MooreO. (2014). Clinical management of dementia: an overview. In FosterC.HerrignJ.DoronI. (Eds), The law and ethics of dementia.
Oxford:
Hart.[WorldCat]
5.
BrookmeyerR.JohnsonE.Ziegler-GrahamK.ArrighiH. M. (2007).
Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's and Dementia,
3, 186–191. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.04.381.
6.
CliffordJ. (2011).
The UN Disability Convention and its impact on European equality law. The Equal Rights Review,
6, 11–25.
7.
DonnellyM. (2014). A legal overview. In FosterC.HerringJ.DoronI. (Eds), The law and ethics of dementia (pp. 271–281).
Oxford:
Hart.
8.
DoronI. (2004).
Ageing in the shadow of law: Elder guardianship in Israel. Journal of Ageing and Social Policy,
16(4), 59–77. DOI: 10.1300/J031v16n04_04.
9.
DoronI. (2014). The socio-demographics of dementia. In FosterC.HerringJ.DoronI. (Eds), Dementia, law and ethics (pp. 15–24).
Oxford:
Hart.
10.
DoronI.ApterI. (2010).
The debate around the need for an international convention on the rights of older persons. The Gerontologist,
50(5), 586–593. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnq016.
11.
DoronI.FosterC. (2016).
There a duty to respect 'Historical' faith? Christian proselytism of an older Jewish woman with dementia. Journal of Law and Religion,
31(2), 118–129. DOI: 10.1017/jlr.2016.16.
12.
DoronI.WernerP.SpanierB.LazarO. (2017).
Court rulings involving individuals with dementia in Israel: Mapping the terrain. International Psychogeriatrics,
29(5), 755–763. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610216002453.
13.
DoyleS.FlynnE. (2013).
Ireland's ratification of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Challenges and opportunities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities,
41(3), 171–180. DOI: 10.1111/bld.12050.
14.
EstesC. L. (2001). Social policy and aging.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
15.
FellowsL. K. (1998).
Competency and consent in dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,
46(7), 922–926. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02734.x.
16.
FerriC. P.PrinceM.BrayneC.BrodatyH.FratiglioniL.GanguliM.JormA. (2006).
Global prevalence of dementia: A Delphi consensus study. The Lancet,
366(9503), 2112–2117. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67889-0.
17.
Foster, C., Herring, J., & Doron, I. (Eds.) (2014). The Law and Ethic of Dementia. Oxford: Hart.
18.
GirouxD.TétreaultS.LandryM. P. (2015). Evaluating adult’s competency: Application of the competency assessment process. International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 2015. DOI: 10.1155/2015/753873.
19.
HaberstrohJ.MüllerT. (2017). Capacity to consent to treatment in dementia patients: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie,50(4), 298–303. doi: 10.1007/s00391-017-1243-1.
20.
HarpurP.BalesR. (2010).
The positive impact of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A case study on the South Pacific and lessons from the U.S. experience. Northern Kentucky Law Review,
37(4), 363–388.
21.
JacobyR. (2010). Legal issues and dementia. In AmesD.BurnsA.O'BrienJ. T. (Eds), Dementia (4th ed., pp. 279–283).
Boca Raton, FL:
CRC Press.
22.
KaneM. N. (2001).
Legal guardianship and other alternatives in the care of elders with Alzheimer's disease. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias,
16(2), 89–96. DOI: 10.1177/153331750101600208.
23.
KanterA. S. (2009).
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its implications for the rights of elderly people under international law. Georgia State University Law Review,
25, 527–573.
24.
KappM. (2003). The law and older persons: Is geriatric jurisprudence therapeutic?.
Durham, NC:
Carolina Academic Press.
25.
KappM. B. (2008).
Legal issues in dementia. International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine,
20(1), 91–104. DOI: 10.3233/JRS-2008-0429.
26.
KellyF.InnesA. (2013).
Human rights, citizenship and dementia care nursing. International Journal of Older People Nursing,
8(1), 61–70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2011.00308.x.
27.
KingL.SeriesH. (2014). Assessing capacity. In FosterC.HerringJ.DoronI. (Eds), The law and ethics of dementia. (pp. 283–300).
Oxford:
Hart.
28.
KorczynA.VakhapovaV. (2014). Can dementia be prevented? In FosterC.HerrignJ.DoronI. (Eds), The law and ethics of dementia.
Oxford:
Hart.
29.
LeeD. Y., Lee, J. H., Ju, Y-S., Lee, K. U., Kim, K. W., Jhoo, J. H., … Woo, J. I. (2002).
The prevalence of dementia in older people in an urban population of Korea: The Seoul Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,
50, 123–129.
30.
LiptzinB.PeisahC.ShulmanK.FinkelS. (2010).
Testamentary capacity and delirium. International Psychogeriatrics,
22(6), 950–956. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610210000712.
31.
Love, J.C. (1998). The value of narrative in legal scholarship and teaching. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice, 2, 87–112.
32.
Mäki-Petäjä-Leinonen, A. (2016). Protecting a person with dementia through restrictions of freedom? Notions of autonomy in the theory and practice of elder care. In A. Griffiths, S. Mustasaari, and A. Mäki-Petäjä-Leinonen (Eds.) Subjectivity, Citizenship, and Belonging in Law (pp. 146-170). NY., NY.: Routledge.
33.
MannS. P.BradleyV. J.SahakianB. J. (2016).
Huma rights based approaches to mental health: A review of programs. Health and Human Rights Journal,
18(1), 263–276.
34.
ManthropeJ.SamsiK.RapaportJ. (2012).
More of a leg to stand on: View and usage of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 among staff of local Alzheimer's Society and carer organizations. Aging and Mental Health,
16(1), 102–109. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2011.628971.
35.
MarsonD. C.IngramK. K.CodyH. A.HarrellL. E. (1995).
Assessing the competency of patients with Alzheimer's disease under different legal standards: A prototype instrument. Archives of Neurology,
52(10), 949–954. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540340029010.
Martinez, G. A. (1998). Philosophical considerations and the use of narrative in law. Rutgers Law Journal, 30, 683–701.
38.
MonaghanC.BegleyA. (2004).
Dementia diagnosis and disclosure: A dilemma in practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing,
13(s1), 22–29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00922.x.
39.
NavotS. (2007). The Constitutional Law of Israel.
The Netherlands:
Kluwer.
40.
O'NeillN.PeisahC. (2011). Capacity and the law.
Sydney:
Sydney University Press.
41.
PengF. C. (2003).
Is dementia a disease?.Gerontology,
49, 384–391. DOI: 10.1159/000073767.
42.
PrinceM.BryceR.AlbaneseE.WimoA.RibeiroW.FerriC. P. (2013).
The global prevalence of dementia: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimer's & Dementia,
9(1), 63–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.007.
43.
PrinceM.JacksonJ. (2009). World Alzheimer report.
London:
Alzheimer's Disease International.
44.
QuinnG.DoyleS. (2012).
Taking the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities seriously – The past and future of the EU structural funds as a tool to achieve community living. The Equal Rights Review,
9, 69–94.
45.
Rutten, J. L. (2017). Prevention is better than cure: can exercise prevent dementia? Maastricht Student Journal of Psychology & Neuroscience, 6(1), 1–12.
46.
Román, G. C. (2002). Defining dementia: clinical criteria for diagnosis of vascular dementia. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 106(s178), 6–9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.106.s178.2.x.
47.
ShulmanK.PeisahC.JacobyR.HeinikJ.FinkelS. (2009).
Contemporaneous assessment of testamentary capacity. International Psychogeriatrics,
21(3), 433–439. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610209008874.
48.
SpanierB.DoronI.MilmanF. (2013).
Older persons and the European Court of Human Rights. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology,
28, 407–420. DOI: 10.1007/s10823-013-9212-7.
49.
SonnicksenJ. (2016).
Dementia and representative democracy: Exploring challenges and implications for democratic citizenship. Dementia.
15(3), 330–342. DOI: 10.1177/1471301216638998.
50.
Weisberg, R. H. (1982). How Judges Speak: Some Lessons on Adjudication in Billy Budd, Sailor with an Application to Justice Rehnquist. New York University Law Review, 57(1), 1–69.
51.
WelshS.HassiotisA.O'mahoneyG.DeahlM. (2003).
Big brother is watching you – The ethical implications of electronic surveillance measures in the elderly with dementia and in adults with learning difficulties. Aging and Mental Health,
7(5), 372–375. DOI: 10.1080/1360786031000150658.
52.
WernerP.DoronI. (2016).
Alzheimer's disease and the law: Positive and negative consequences of structural stigma and labeling in the legal system. Aging and Mental Health, 21(11), 69–100. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1211989.
53.
West, R. (1985). Jurisprudence as narrative: An aesthetic analysis of modern legal theory. New York University Law Review, 60(2), 145–211.
54.
WilliamsonT. (2015).
Dementia, rights and the social model of disability. The Journal of Dementia Care,
23(5), 12–13.
55.
WoodsB.PrattR. (2005).
Awareness in dementia: Ethical and legal issues in relation to people with dementia. Aging and Mental Health,
9(5), 423–429. DOI: 10.1080/13607860500143125.
56.
World Alzheimer Report. (2009). The global prevalence of dementia.
London:
Alzheimer's Disease International.
57.
Yuval, J. (2002). Narrative justice. Iuney Mishpat, 18, 1–42.
