The aim of this article is to investigate how spouses in couples with dementia position themselves in relation to each other by analysing their use of pronouns, especially the we. The study uses joint interviews with 11 couples. Based on a quantitative analysis of pronoun use, it is argued that the pronoun we is used by all the spouses; however, it is used less frequently by the spouses with dementia in comparison with healthy spouses. A qualitative analysis of the use of the pronoun we shows that the spouses position, experience and consider themselves as a couple and that they position and experience themselves as individuals in relation to the couple. One of the challenges for couples with dementia is to be able to retain a we in face of the progression of the dementia disease. By positioning themselves in various ways, the spouses establish and negotiate quite a complex and emotionally charged web of relationships.
AblittA.JonesG. V.MuersJ. (2009) Living with dementia: a systematic review of the influence of relationship factors. Aging & Mental Health13: 497–511.
2.
AgnewC. R.Van LangeP. A. M.RusbultC. E.LangstonC. A. (1998) Cognitive interdependence: commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74: 939–954.
3.
AntakiC.WiddicombeS. (1998) Identities in talk, London, UK: Sage Publications.
4.
BadrH.AcitelliL. K.Carmack TaylorC. L. (2007) Does couple identity mediate the stress experienced by caregiving spouses?Psychology and Health22: 211–229.
5.
BraunM.ScholzU.BaileyB.PerrenS.HornungR.MartinM. (2009) Dementia caregiving in spousal relationships: a dyadic perspective. Aging & Mental Health13: 426–436.
6.
BuehlmanK. T.GottmanJ. M.KatzL. F. (1992) How a couple views their past predicts their future: predicting divorce from an oral history interview. Journal of Family Psychology5: 295–318.
7.
DaviesB.HarréR. (1990) Positioning: the discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour20: 43–63.
8.
DaviesJ. C. (2011) Preserving the “us identity” through marriage commitment while living with early-stage dementia. Dementia10: 217–234.
9.
FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. E.McHughP. R. (1975) “Mini-Mental State”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research12: 189–198.
10.
GoffmanE. (1967) Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior, New York, NY: Doubleday.
11.
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in Public. Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
12.
GoffmanE. (1974) Frame analysis. An essay on the organization of experience, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
GoffmanE. (1981) Forms of talk, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
14.
GottmanJ. M. (2011) The science of trust. Emotional attunement for couples, New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
15.
GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (1992) Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63: 221–233.
16.
HanksW. F. (1990) Referential practice. Language and lived space among the Maya, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
17.
HarréR.van LangenhoveL. (1999) Positioning theory: moral contexts of intentional action, Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
18.
HellströmI.NolanM.LundhU. (2005) ‘We do things together’: a case study of ‘couplehood’ in dementia. Dementia4: 7–22.
19.
HellströmI.NolanM.LundhU. (2007) Sustaining ‘couplehood’: spouses’ strategies for living positively with dementia. Dementia6: 383–409.
20.
HydénL. C. (2011) Narrative collaboration and scaffolding in dementia. Journal of Aging Studies25: 339–347.
21.
HydénL. C. (2013) Storytelling in dementa: embodiment as a resource. Dementia12: 359–367.
22.
Hydén, L. C., Nilsson, E., & Hellström, I. (submitted). Couples and dementia: A critical discussion of qualiative studies.
23.
JosephsK. A. (2007) Capgras syndrome and its relationship to neurodegenerative disease. Archives of Neurology64: 1762–1766.
24.
KaplanL. (2001) A couplehood typology for spouses of institutionalized persons with Alzheimer’s disease: perceptions of ‘‘we’’–‘‘I’’. Family Relations50: 87–98.
25.
KarremansJ. C.van LangeP. A. M. (2008) The role of forgiveness in shifting from “me” to “we”. Self and Identity7: 75–88.
26.
KeadyJ.Ashcroft-SimpsonS.HalliganK.WilliamsS. (2007) Admiral nursing and the family care of a parent with dementia: using autobiographical narrative as grounding for negotiated clinical practice and decision-making. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science21: 345–353.
27.
MolyneauxV. J.ButchardS.SimpsonJ.MurrayC. (2011) The co-construction of couplehood in dementia. Dementia11: 483–502.
28.
MühlhäuslerP.HarréR. (1990) Pronouns and people: the linguistic construction of social and personal identity, Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
29.
ÖrulvL. (2010) Placing the place, and placing oneself within it. (Dis)orientation and (dis)continuity in dementia. Dementia9: 21–44.
30.
PsathasG. (1995) Conversations analysis. The study of talk-in-interaction, London, UK: Sage Publications.
31.
PurvesB. (2011) Exploring positioning in Alzheimer disease through analyses of family talk. Dementia10: 35–58.
32.
RohrbaughM. J.MehlM. R.ShohamV.ReillyE. S.EwyG. A. (2008) Prognostic significance of spouse we talk in couples coping with heart failure. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology76: 781–789.
33.
SabatS. R.HarréR. (1992) The construction and deconstruction of self in Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing and Society12: 443–461.
34.
SabatS. R.HarréR. (1994) The Alzheimer’s disease sufferer as a semiotic subject. Philosophy, Psychology, Psychiatry1: 145–160.
35.
SabatS. R.LeeJ. M. (2012) Relatedness among people diagnosed with dementia: social cognition and the possibility of friendship. Dementia11: 315–327.
36.
SeiderB. H.HirschbergerG.NelsonK. L.LevensonR. W. (2009) We can work it out: age differences in relational pronouns, physiology, and behaviour in marital conflict. Psychology and Aging24: 604–613.
37.
SillarsA. L.BurggrafC. S.YostS.ZietlowP. H. (1992) Conversational themes and marital relationship definitions: quantitative and qualitative investigations. Human Communication Research19: 124–154.
38.
Sillars, A., Shellen, W., McIntosh, A., & Pomegranate, M. (1997). Relational characteristics of language: Elaboration and differentiation in marital conversations. Western Journal of Communication, 61, 403–422.
39.
SimmonsR. A.GordonP. C.ChamblessD. L. (2005) Pronouns in marital interaction. What do “you” and “I” say about marital health?American Psychological Society16: 932–936.
40.
WieselquistJ.RusbultC. E.FosterC. A.AngewC. R. (1999) Commitment, pro-relationship behaviour, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology77: 942–966.
41.
Williams-BaucomK. J.AtkinsD. C.SevierM.EldridgeK. A.ChristensenA. (2010) “You” and “I” need to talk about “us:” linguistic patterns in couple interactions. Personal Relationships17: 41–56.
42.
YsseldykR.WohlM. J. A. (2012) I forgive therefore I’m committed: a longitudinal examination of commitment after a romantic relationship transgression. Canadian Psychological Association44: 257–263.
