Dementia continues to be under-recognized, an important issue in many countries. Policy addressing this has focused on the role of general practice-based staff, but dementia represents an area in which closer collaboration between community health and social services can reap benefits. This study examined the impact of a national policy in England, the Single Assessment Process (SAP), introduced across these agencies from April 2004, aimed at improving assessments by the use of shared procedures and assessment tools. Impact was measured in terms of the reliability by which dementia, and associated conditions, were identified and correctly detected in one area’s statutory community care assessments. Recognition of dementia, grooming, toileting and incontinence difficulties were significantly improved after the policy. Depression was an exception. Existing communication difficulties made it more likely that dementia would be identified and correctly recognized. Findings are discussed in terms of more closely involving care managers in detecting dementia.
AraiY.ZaritS. H.KumamotoK.TakedaA. (2003). Are there inequities in the assessment of dementia under Japan’s LTC insurance system?. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18, 346–352.
4.
BanerjeeS.MacdonaldA. (1996). Mental disorder in an elderly home care population: Associations with health and social service use. British Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 750–756.
5.
BarnetteJ. J. (2005). ScoreRel CI: An Excel program for computing confidence intervals for commonly used score reliability coefficients. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 980–983.
6.
BjorkgrenM. A.FriesB. E.ShugarmanL. R. (2000). Testing a RUG-III based case-mix system for home care. Canadian Journal of Aging, 19(Suppl 2), 106–125.
7.
BlackK.LoGiudiceD.AmesD.BarberB.SmithR. (2001). Diagnosing dementia: A reference paper. Melbourne: University of Melbourne; Alzheimer’s Association Australia.
8.
BrayneC.CallowayP. (1990). The case identification of dementia in the community. A comparison of methods. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 5, 309–316.
9.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
10.
CarpenterG. I.MainA.TurnerG. F. (1995). Case-mix for the elderly inpatient: Resource Utilization Groups (RUGs) validation project. Age and Ageing, 24, 5–13.
11.
ChallisD.ClarksonP.WilliamsonJ.HughesJ.VenablesD.BurnsA.WeinbergA. (2004). The value of specialist clinical assessment of older people prior to entry to care homes. Age and Ageing, 33, 25–34.
12.
ChallisD.von AbendorffR.BrownP.ChestermanJ.HughesJ. (2002). Care management, dementia care and specialist mental health services: An evaluation. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17, 315–325.
13.
ClarksonP.VenablesD.HughesJ.BurnsA.ChallisD. (2006). Integrated specialist assessment of older people and predictors of care home admission. Psychological Medicine, 36, 1011–1021.
14.
CohenJ. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
15.
CohenM. A.TellE. J.WallackS. S. (1986). Client-related risk factors of nursing home entry amongst elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 785–792.
16.
DawsonB.TrappR. (2004). Basic and clinical biostatistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
Department of Health. (1990). Community care in the next decade and beyond: Policy guidance. London: Department of Health.
18.
Department of Health. (2001). National service framework for older people. London: Stationery Office.
19.
Department of Health. (2002a). Guidance on the Single Assessment Process for older people. HSC 2002/001: LAC (2002) 1. London: Department of Health.
20.
Department of Health. (2002b). Fair access to care services. Guidance on eligibility criteria for adult social care. LAC (2002) 13. London: Department of Health.
21.
Department of Health. (2004). Single Assessment Process for older people: Implementation guidance for April 2004. London: Department of Health.
22.
Department of Health. (2008). Health and care services for older people: Overview report on research to support the National Service Framework for older people. London: Department of Health.
23.
Department of Health. (2009). Living well with dementia: A national dementia strategy. London: Department of Health.
24.
DonnerA. (1998). Sample size requirements for the comparison of two or more coefficients of inter-observer agreement. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 1157–1168.
25.
DonnerA.EliasziwM.KlarN. (1996). Testing the homogeneity of kappa statistics. Biometrics, 52, 176–183.
26.
DownsM.TurnerS.BryansM.WilcockJ.KeadyJ.LevinE.O’CarrollR.HowieK.IliffeS. (2006). Effectiveness of educational interventions in improving detection and management of dementia in primary care: Cluster randomised controlled study. British Medical Journal, 332, 692–696.
27.
DunnG. (1989). Design and analysis of reliability studies: The statistical evaluation of measurement errors. London: Edward Arnold.
28.
ElyM.BrayneC.HuppertF. A.O’ConnerD. W.PollittP. A. (1997). Cognitive impairment: A challenge for community care. A comparison of the domiciliary service receipt of cognitively impaired and equally dependent physically impaired elderly women. Age and Ageing, 26, 301–308.
29.
EvansS.MeansR. (2005). Single assessment for older people: New dawn or continued confusion?. Nursing Older People, 17, 16–18.
30.
FerriterK.GangopadhyayP.NilforooshanR.ArdernM. (2006). Quality of referrals to old age psychiatry following introduction of the single assessment process. Psychiatric Bulletin, 30, 452–453.
31.
GoldbergD.HuxleyP. (1980). Mental illness in the community: The pathway to psychiatric care. London: Tavistock.
32.
House of Commons Health Select Committee. (1998). The relationship between health and social services. First report volume 1, session 1998–99, report and proceedings of the committee. HC 74-I. London: Stationery Office.
33.
JiménezJ. S.ChaparroF. P.SmithP. (2003). Evaluating the introduction of a quasi-market in community care. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 37, 1–13.
34.
KnappM.PrinceM.AlbaneseE.BanerjeeS.DhanasiriS.FernandezJ.-L. (2007). Dementia UK: Report to the Alzheimer’s Society. London: London School of Economics and Political Science/King’s College/Alzheimer’s Society.
35.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
36.
MahoneyF. I.BarthelD. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61–65.
37.
ManthorpeJ.IlifeS. (2005). Timely responses to dementia: Exploring the social work role. Journal of Social Work, 5, 191–203.
38.
ManthorpeJ.IlifeS.EdenA. (2003). Early recognition of dementia by nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44, 183–191.
39.
MayoE. (1949). Hawthorne and the Western Electric Company, the social problems of an industrial civilisation. London: Routledge.
40.
McNallyD.CornesM.CloughR. (2003). Implementing the Single Assessment Process: Driving change or expecting the impossible?. Journal of Integrated Care, 11, 18–29.
41.
McNameeR. (2005). Regression modelling and other methods to control confounding. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62, 500–506.
42.
MillerP. A.ButinD. (2000). The role of occupational therapy in dementia – C.O.P.E. (caregiver options for practical experiences). International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 86–89.
43.
MolloyD. W.StandishT. I. M. (1997). Mental status and neuropsychological assessment: A guide to the standardized Mini-Mental State Examination. International Psychogeriatrics, 9, 87–94.
44.
MoriartyJ. (2002). Assessing the mental health needs of older people: Systematic review on the use of standardised measures to improve assessment practice. London: King’s College London.
45.
National Audit Office. (2007). Improving services and support for people with dementia. London: The Stationery Office.
46.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence/Social Care Institute for Excellence. (2006). Dementia: Supporting people with dementia and their carers. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence/Social Care Institute for Excellence.
47.
NettenA.DartonR.BebbingtonA.BrownP. (2001). Residential or nursing home care? The appropriateness of placement decisions. Ageing & Society, 21, 3–23.
48.
PattieA. H.GilleardC. J. (1979). Manual of the Clifton Assessment Procedures for the Elderly (CAPE). Sevenoaks: Hodder and Stoughton Educational.
49.
PhilpI. (2007). A recipe for care – not a single ingredient. London: Department of Health.
50.
RondeauV.AlllainH.BakchineS.BonetP.BrudonF.ChauplannazG. (2008). General practice-based intervention for suspecting and detecting dementia in France. Dementia, 7, 433–450.
51.
RuncimanP. (1989). Health assessment of the elderly at home: The case for shared learning. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 14, 111–119.
52.
SandersonM.WangJ.DavisD. R.LaneM. J.CornmanC. B.FaddenM. K. (2002). Co-morbidity associated with dementia. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 17(2), 73–78.
53.
Scottish Executive. (2001). Guidance on single shared assessment of community care needs, circular no: CCD 8/2001. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
54.
ShiekhJ.YesavageJ. (1986). Geriatric Depression Scale; recent evidence and development of a shorter version. In BrinkT. L. (Ed.), Clinical gerontology: A guide to assessment and intervention (pp. 165–173). New York: Howarth Press.
55.
SimJ.WrightC. C. (2005). The kappa statistic in reliability studies: Use, interpretation and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy, 85, 257–268.
56.
SkaaneP.EngedalK.SkjennaldaA. (1997). Interobserver variation in the interpretation of breast imaging. Comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and both combined in the interpretation of palpable noncalcified breast masses. Acta Radiologica, 38, 497–502.
57.
SolomonP. A.BrushM.CalvoV.AdamsF.DeVeauxR. D.PendleburyW. W.SullivanD. M. (2000). Identifying dementia in the primary care practice. International Psychogeriatrics, 12, 483–493.
58.
StewartK.ChallisD.CarpenterI.DickinsonE. (1999). Assessment approaches for older people receiving social care: Content and coverage. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 147–156.
59.
SutcliffeC.HughesJ.AbendsternM.ClarksonP.ChallisD. (2008). Developing multidisciplinary assessment – exploring the evidence from a social care perspective. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 23, 1297–1305.
60.
TyleeA.KatonaC. L. E. (1996). Detecting and managing depression in older people. British Journal of General Practice, 46, 207–208.
61.
VenablesD.ClarksonP.HughesJ.BurnsA.ChallisD. (2006). Specialist clinical assessment of vulnerable older people: Outcomes for carers from a randomised controlled trial. Ageing & Society, 26, 867–882.
62.
WachokterS.ArmstrongB.HartgeP. (1993). Validation studies using an alloyed gold standard. American Journal of Epidemiology, 137, 1251–1258.
63.
Welsh Assembly Government. (2002). Creating a unified and fair system for assessing and managing care. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.
64.
YesavageJ. A. (1988). Geriatric depression scale. Psychopharmacological Bulletin, 24, 709–710.
65.
YesavageJ. A.BrinkT. L.RoseT. L.LumO.HuangV.DayM. (1983). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17, 37–49.
